Previous work has shown that context influences the political participation rates of certain minority groups. However, few have tested exactly what drives this relationship. In this article, we assess one possible mechanism: the effect of co-ethnic population size on the acquisition of political knowledge. Our argument is that ethnic context helps condition information acquisition among co-ethnics, which, in turn, affects political engagement. Focusing on Latinos, we show that co-ethnic population size in a county matters and importantly, that as the Latino population increases, political information gaps between citizens and non-citizens decrease considerably. Finally, we show similar results regarding levels of political interest and discuss how both knowledge and interest may condition behavior.
AchenC. H. (2005). Let’s put garbage-can regressions and garbage-can probits where they belong. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 22, 327-339.
2.
ArvizuJ. R.GarciaF. C. (1996). Latino voting participation: Explaining and differentiating Latino voting turnout. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18, 104-128.
3.
BarberM.ImaiK. (2014). Estimating neighborhood effects on turnout from geocoded voter registration records. Princeton, NJ: Mimeo.
4.
BarretoM. A.MunozJ. A. (2003). Reexamining the “politics of in-between”: Political participation among Mexican immigrants in the United States. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25, 427-447.
5.
BarretoM. A.SeguraG. M.WoodsN. D. (2004). The mobilizing effect of majority–minority districts on Latino turnout. American Political Science Review, 98, 65-75.
6.
BennettS. E. (1988). Know-nothings revisited: The meaning of political ignorance today. Social Science Quarterly, 69, 476-490.
7.
BerryW. D.DeMerittJ. H.EsareyJ. (2010). Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: Is a product term essential?American Journal of Political Science, 54, 248-266.
8.
BoboL.GilliamF. D.Jr. (1990). Race, sociopolitical participation and black empowerment. American Political Science Review, 84, 377-393.
9.
BraderT.ValentinoN. A.SuhayE. (2008). What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 959-978.
BrantonR.JonesB. S. (2005). Reexamining racial attitudes: The conditional relationship between diversity and socioeconomic environment. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 359-372.
12.
CampbellA.ConverseP. E.MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: John Wiley.
13.
CampbellD. E. (2006). Why we vote: How schools and communities shape our civic life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
ChaffeeS. H.WilsonD. G. (1977). Media rich, media poor: Two studies of diversity in agenda holding. Journalism Quarterly, 54, 466-476.
15.
ConverseP. E. (1990). Popular representation and the distribution of information. In FerejohnJ. A.KuklinskiJ. H. (Eds.), Information and democratic processes (pp. 369-388). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
16.
de la GarzaR. O.DesipioL.GarciaC.GarciaJ.FlaconA. (1992). Latino voices: Mexican, Puerto Rican, and Cuban perspectives on American politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
17.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS.KennamerJ. D. (1994). Effects of the news media environment on citizen knowledge of state politics and government. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 443-456.
19.
FélixA.GonzálezC.RamírezR. (2008). Political protest, ethnic media, and Latino naturalization. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 618-634.
20.
FragaB. L. (2015). Candidates or districts? Reevaluating the role of race in voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/ajps.12172
21.
FragaL. R.GarciaJ. A.HeroR. E.Jones-CorreaM.Martinez-EbersV.SeguraG. M. (2006). Latino National Survey (LNS), ICPSR20862-v6 [Data file and codebook]. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20862.v6.
22.
FragaL. R.GarciaJ. A.HeroR. E.Jones-CorreaM.Martinez-EbersV.SeguraG. M. (2012). Latinos in the new millennium: An almanac of opinion, behavior and policy references. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23.
FranzeseR. J. (2005). Empirical strategies for various manifestations of multilevel data. Political Analysis, 13, 430-446.
24.
FranzeseR. J.KamC. (2009). Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
GentzkowM.ShapiroJ. M. (2010). What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78, 35-71.
28.
GimpelJ. G.DyckJ. J.ShawD. R. (2004). Registrants, voters and turnout variability across neighborhoods. Political Behavior, 26, 343-375.
29.
GorenP. (2012). On voter competence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30.
HutchingsV. L. (2001). Political context, issue salience, and selective attentiveness: Constituent knowledge of the Clarence Thomas confirmation vote. The Journal of Politics, 63, 846-868.
31.
ImaiK.KingG.LauO. (2009). R package version, 3(5).
32.
IyengarS.CurranJ.LundA. B.SalovaaraI.HyunK. S.CoenS. (2010). Crossnational versus individual-level differences in political information: A media systems perspective. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 20, 291-309.
33.
JeritJ.BarabasJ.BolsenT. (2006). Citizens, knowledge, and the information environment. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 266-282.
34.
Jones-CorreaM. (2007). Fuzzy distinctions and blurred boundaries: Transnational, ethnic and immigrant politics. In EspinoR.LealD.MeierK. (Eds.), Latino politics: Identity, mobilization and representation (pp. 44-60). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
35.
Jones-CorreaM.LealD. S. (2001). Political participation: Does religion matter?Political Research Quarterly, 54, 751-770.
KimY.-C.JungJ.-Y.Ball-RokeachS. J. (2006). Geo-ethnicity and neighborhood engagement: A communication infrastructure perspective. Political Communication, 23, 421-441.
38.
LealD. L. (2002). Political participation by Latino non-citizens in the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 353-370.
39.
LeighleyJ. E. (2001). Strength in numbers? The political mobilization of racial and ethnic minorities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
LuskinR. C. (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior, 12, 331-361.
41.
MacdonaldS. E.RabinowitzG.ListhaugO. (1995). Political sophistication and models of issue voting. British Journal of Political Science, 25, 453-483.
42.
MarschallM.StolleD. (2004). Race and the city: Neighborhood context and the development of generalized trust. Political Behavior, 26, 125-153.
43.
McClurgS. D. (2006). Political disagreement in context: The conditional effect of neighborhood context, disagreement and political talk on electoral participation. Political Behavior, 28, 349-366.
44.
McPhersonJ. M.Smith-LovinL. (1986). Sex segregation in voluntary associations. American Sociological Review, 51, 61-79.
45.
MichelsonM. R. (2003). Getting out the Latino vote: How door-to-door canvassing influences voter turnout in rural central California. Political Behavior, 25, 247-263.
46.
MutzD. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
47.
NeumanW. R. (1986). The paradox of mass politics: Knowledge and opinion in the American electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
NicholsonS. P.PantojaA.SeguraG. M. (2006). Political knowledge and issue voting among the Latino electorate. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 259-271.
49.
PantojaA. D.SeguraG. M. (2003). Fear and loathing in California: Contextual threat and political sophistication among Latino voters. Political Behavior, 25, 265-286.
50.
ParsonsT.ShilsE. A. (1951). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
PopielarzP. A.McPhersonJ. M. (1995). On the edge of in between: Niche position, niche overlap, and the duration of voluntary association memberships. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 698-720.
53.
RamakrishnanS. K.BloemraadI. (2008). Making organizations count: Immigrant civic engagement in California cities. In RamakrishnanS. K.BloemraadI. (Eds.), Civic hopes and political realities: Immigrants, community organizations, and political engagement (pp. 45-76). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
54.
RamírezR. (2013). Mobilizing opportunities: The evolving Latino electorate and the future of American politics. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
55.
RosenstoneS. J.HansenJ. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. London, England: Longman.
56.
SanchezG. R. (2006). The role of group consciousness in Latino public opinion. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 435-446.
StolleD.SorokaS.JohnstonR. (2008). When does diversity erode trust? Neighborhood diversity, interpersonal trust and the mediating effect of social interactions. Policy Studies, 56, 57-75.
Tam ChoW. K.BaerN. (2011). Environmental determinants of racial attitudes redux: The critical decisions related to operationalizing context. American Politics Research, 39, 414-436.
61.
Tam ChoW. K.GimpelJ. G.DyckJ. (2006). Residential concentration, political socialization and voter turnout. The Journal of Politics, 68, 156-167.
62.
UslanerE. M.ConleyR. S. (2003). Civic engagement and particularized trust: The ties that bind people to their ethnic communities. American Politics Research, 31, 331-360.
63.
ValdezZ. (2011). Political participation among Latinos in the United States: The effect of group identity and consciousness. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 466-482.
64.
VerbaS.NieN. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
WongC.BowersJ.WilliamsT.SimmonsK. D. (2012). Bringing the person back in: Boundaries, perceptions, and the measurement of racial context. The Journal of Politics, 74, 1153-1170.
67.
ZallerJ. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
