This article examines the extent to which advertising outside of an explicit campaign environment has the potential to benefit the electoral fortunes of incumbent politicians. We make use of a novel case of non-campaign advertising, that of North Carolina Secretary of Labor Cherie Berry (R-NC), who has initiated the practice of having her picture and name displayed prominently on official inspection placards inside all North Carolina elevators. We extend Mayhew’s theory of advertising to a non-campaign environment and then theorize that Berry serves as a novel case of non-campaign-specific advertising via a priming mechanism. We then test our theory using spatial regression methods and find that Berry outperformed other statewide Republican candidates in the 2012 North Carolina elections. Our findings suggest that candidates can use this form of advertising to indirectly improve their electoral fortunes.
BraderT. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 388-405.
5.
CampbellA.ConverseP.MillerW.StokesD. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: John Wiley.
ConverseP. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In ApterD. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York, NY: The Free Press.
10.
ConverseP. (1966). The concept of a normal vote. In CampbellA.ConverseP.MillerW.StokesD. (Eds.), Elections and the political order (pp. 9-39). New York, NY: John Wiley.
11.
DruckmanJ. (2004). Priming the vote: Campaign effects in a U.S. senate election. Political Psychology, 25, 577-594.
12.
DruckmanJ.JacobsL.OstermeierE. (2004). Candidate strategies to prime issue and image. Journal of Politics, 66, 1180-1202.
13.
ElhorstJ. (2010). Applied spatial econometrics: Raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5, 9-28.
FreedmanP.FranzM.GoldsteinK. (2004). Campaign advertising and democratic citizenship. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 723-741.
16.
GainesB. (1995). Incumbency advantage and the personal vote in the Anglo-Atlantic democracies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, CA.
17.
GelmanA.KingG. (1990). Estimating incumbency advantage without bias. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 1142-1164.
LauR.SiegelmanL.RovnerI. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytic reassessment. Journal of Politics, 69, 1176-1209.
23.
LeSageJ.PaceK. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
24.
Lewis-BeckM.JacobyW.NorpothH.WeisbergH. (2008). The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
25.
LodgeM.McGrawK.StrohP. (1989). An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 83, 399-419.
26.
LodgeM.SteenbergenM.BrauS. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89, 309-326.
27.
LodgeM.TaberC. (2000). Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In LupiaA.McCubbinsD.PopkinS. (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 183-213). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28.
LupiaA.McCubbinsM. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29.
MayhewD. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
McDermottM. (2005). Candidate occupations and voter information shortcuts. Journal of Politics, 67, 201-219.
31.
McGrawK.LingC. (2003). Media priming of presidential and group evaluations. Political Communication, 20, 23-40.
32.
MendelsohnM. (1996). The media and interpersonal communications: The priming of issues, leaders, and party identification. Political Behavior, 58, 112-125.
PlumbE. (1986). Validation of voter recall, time of electoral decision making. Political Behavior, 8, 302-312.
43.
PopkinS. (1994). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
RohdeD. (1979). Risk-bearing and progressive ambition: The case of members of the United States House of Representatives. American Journal of Political Science, 23, 1-26.
45.
SchaffnerB.StrebM. (2002). The partisan heuristic and low-information elections. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 559-581.
46.
SellersP. (1998). Strategy and background in congressional campaigns. American Political Science Review, 92, 159-171.
ShawD. (1999). The effect of TV ads and candidate appearances on statewide presidential votes, 1988-96. American Political Science Review, 93, 345-361.
49.
SimonH. (1979). Models of thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
