Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this study, we assess whether Blacks and/or Latinos are more likely to identify with political parties that nominate a U.S. House candidate who shares their race/ethnicity using the 2010 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES). Our results indicate that Blacks are more likely to identify with both the Democratic and Republican Party when they nominate successful Black candidates for the House of Representatives. To assess the temporal order of the relationship, we examine the differences in Black Democratic partisanship before and after Obama’s election to the White House and changes in Republican partisanship among Blacks in districts before and after the nomination of a successful Black Republican candidate. In combination, we find that both political parties can make gains in the Black community through the nomination of co-racial candidates. While descriptive candidates consistently influence Black partisanship, we find that Latino partisanship is not significantly affected by the presence of co-ethnic candidates.

Keywords

Black politics Latino politics partisanship descriptive representation Congress

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allsop

Weisberg

H. F.

(1988). Measuring change in party identification in an election campaign. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 996-1017.

Barreto

M. A.

(2010). Ethnic cues: The role of shared ethnicity in Latino political participation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Barreto

M. A.

Nuño

S. A.

(2011). The effectiveness of coethnic contact on Latino political recruitment. Political Research Quarterly, 64, 448-459.

Bobo

Gilliam

F. D.

Jr. (1990). Race, sociopolitical participation, and black empowerment. The American Political Science Review, 84, 377-393.

Bositis

(2010). The political orientations of young African Americans. In Marable

Clarke

(Eds.), Barack Obama and African American empowerment: The rise of Black America’s new leadership (pp. 81-90). New York, NY: Palgrave-MacMillan.

Bowler

Nicholson

S. P.

Segura

G. M.

(2006). Earthquakes and aftershocks: Race, direct democracy, and partisan change. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 146-159.

Brody

R. A.

Rothenberg

L. S.

(1988). The instability of partisanship: An analysis of the 1980 presidential election. British Journal of Political Science, 18, 445-465.

Cain

B. E.

Kiewiet

D. R.

Uhlaner

C. J.

(1991). The acquisition of partisanship by Latinos and Asian Americans. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 390-422.

Campbell

Converse

P. E.

Miller

W. E.

Stokes

D. E.

(1960). The American voter. New York, NY: Wiley Press.

10.

Canon

D. T.

(1999). Race, redistricting and representation: The unintended consequences of black majority districts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

11.

Carsey

T. M.

Layman

G. C.

(2006). Changing sides or changing minds? Party identification and policy preferences in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 464-477.

12.

Coffin

(2003). The Latino vote: Shaping America’s electoral future. The Political Quarterly, 74, 214-222.

13.

Dawson

M. C.

(1994). Behind the mule: Race, class and African American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

14.

DeSipio

(1996). Counting on the Latino vote: Latinos as the new electorate. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

15.

Evans

Franco

Polinard

J. L.

Wenzel

J. P.

Wrinkle

R. D.

(2012). Ethnic concerns and Latino party identification. The Social Science Journal, 49, 150-154.

16.

Fiorina

M. P.

(1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

17.

Franklin

C. H.

(1992). Measurement and the dynamics of party identification. Political Behavior, 14, 297-309.

18.

Franklin

C. H.

Jackson

J. E.

(1983). The dynamics of party identification. American Political Science Review, 77, 957-973.

19.

Frymer

(1999). Uneasy alliances: Race and party competition in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

20.

Green

D. P.

Palmquist

Schickler

(2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

21.

Green

D. P.

Schickler

(1993). Multiple-measure assessment of party identification. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 505-535.

22.

Griffin

J. D.

Keane

(2006). Descriptive representation and the composition of African American turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 998-1012.

23.

Grofman

Handley

(1989). Minority population proportion and Black and Hispanic congressional success in the 1970s and 1980s. American Politics Research, 17, 436-445.

24.

Grose

C. R.

(2011). Congress in Black and White. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Gurin

Hatchett

Jackson

(1989). Hope and independence: Blacks’ response to electoral and party politics. New York: Russell Sage.

26.

Hajnal

Z. L.

Lee

(2011). Why Americans don’t join the party: Race, immigration, and the failure (of political parties) to engage in the electorate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

27.

King

(2006). A black/non-black theory of African-American partisanship: Hostility, racial consciousness and the Republican Party (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from University of North Texas Library. (70699470)

28.

Lublin

(1999). The paradox of representation: Racial gerrymandering and minority interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

29.

Lyons

(2011). Where you live and who you know: Political environments, social pressures, and partisan stability. American Politics Research, 39, 963-992.

30.

Mansbridge

(1999). Should Blacks represent Blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes.” The Journal of Politics, 61, 628-657.

31.

Mendelberg

(2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

32.

Michelson

(2000). Political efficacy and electoral participation of Chicago Latinos. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 136-150.

33.

Minta

M. D.

(2011). Oversight: Representing the interests of Blacks and Latinos in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

34.

Nuño

S. A.

(2007). Latino mobilization and vote choice in the 2000 presidential election. American Politics Research, 35, 273-293.

35.

Page

B. I.

Jones

C. C.

(1979). Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote. The American Political Science Review, 73, 1071-1089.

36.

Philpot

(2007). Race, Republicans, and the return of the party of Lincoln. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

37.

Rapoport

R. B.

(1997). Partisanship change in a candidate-centered Era. The Journal of Politics, 59, 185-199.

38.

Sanchez

G. R.

Morin

J. L.

(2011). The effect of descriptive representation on Latinos’ views of government and of themselves. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 483-508.

39.

Schildkraut

D. J.

(2013). Which birds of a feather flock together? Assessing attitudes about descriptive representation among Latinos and Asian Americans. American Politics Research, 41, 699-729.

40.

Tate

(1991). Black political participation in the 1984 and 1988 presidential elections. The American Political Science Review, 85, 1159-1176.

41.

Tate

(2003). Black faces in the mirror. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

42.

White

I. K.

Philpot

T. S.

Wylie

McGowen

(2007). Feeling the pain of my people: Hurricane Katrina, racial inequality, and the psyche of Black America. Journal of Black Studies, 37, 523-538.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.25 MB