The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision to strike down a key component of the 1965 Voting Rights Act (VRA) closes one of the most successful chapters in the history of civil rights enforcement. Our country has changed since 1965 and it is an opportune time to examine current political conditions for minority voters. Based on analysis of congressional elections from 1960 to 2010, I assess the central holding of Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder, and other controversial areas of VRA enforcement. My results support the Court’s finding that the Act’s historic coverage formula does not accurately reflect current political conditions. However, my results challenge prevailing views on two points. I conclude that uniform standards are problematic because redistricting guidelines that improve opportunities for African American voters are likely to diminish opportunities for Latino voters (and vice versa). In addition, requiring majority African American districts appears to diminish aggregate African American voting opportunities relative to targeting 45% to 50% African American districts.
AnsolabehereS.PersilyN.StewartC.III(2009). Race, religion, and vote choice in the 2008 election: Implications for the future of the Voting Rights Act. Harvard Law Review, 123, 1385-1436.
2.
Atlanta Election Figures Viewed as Favorable to White in Runoff. (1977). New York Times, p. 18.
BarretoM. A.SeguraG. M.WoodsN. D. (2004). The mobilizing effect of majority-minority districts on Latino turnout. The American Political Science Review, 98, 65-75. doi:10.2307/4145297
BullockC. S. (2010). Redistricting: The most political activity in America. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
CameronC.EpsteinD.O’HalloranS. (1996). Do majority-minority districts maximize substantive Black representation in congress?The American Political Science Review, 90, 794-812. doi:10.2307/2945843
8.
CanonD. T. (2008). Renewing the Voting Rights Act: Retrogression, influence, and the “Georgia v. Ashcroft Fix.”Election Law Journal, 7(1), 3-24.
9.
CasellasJ. P. (2009). The institutional and demographic determinants of Latino representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34, 399-426. doi:10.2307/20680248
10.
ChoW. K. T.BaerN. (2011). Environmental determinants of racial attitudes redux: The critical decisions related to operationalizing context. American Politics Research, 39, 414-436.
11.
CoxG. W.KatzJ. N. (2002). Elbridge Gerry’s salamander: The electoral consequences of the reapportionment revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
DahlR. A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
EngstromR. (2012). Influence district and the courts: A concept in need of clarity. In McCoolD. (Ed.), The most fundamental right: Contrasting perspectives on the Voting Rights Act (pp. 67-122). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
14.
EpsteinD.O’HalloranS. (1999). A social science approach to race, redistricting, and representation. The American Political Science Review, 93, 187-191. doi:10.2307/2585770
15.
Fuentes-RohwerL.DurfeeL. (2009). Leaving the thicket at last?Michigan State Law Review, 2009, 417-453.
16.
GayC. (2006). Seeing difference: The effect of economic disparity on Black attitudes toward Latinos. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 982-997. doi:10.2307/4122928
17.
GelmanA.KingG. (1994). Enhancing democracy through legislative redistricting. The American Political Science Review, 88, 541-559. doi:10.2307/2944794
18.
GimpelJ. G.ChoW. K. T. (2004). The persistence of White ethnicity in New England politics. Political Geography, 23, 987-1008.
19.
GrofmanB. (1993). Voting rights in multi-ethnic world. Chicano-Latino Law Review, 13, 15-37.
20.
GrofmanB.HandleyL.LublinD. (2000). Drawing effective minority districts: A conceptual framework and some empirical evidence. North Carolina Law Review, 79, 1383-1430.
21.
GrofmanB.KingG. (2007). The future of partisan symmetry as a judicial test for partisan gerrymandering after LULAC v. Perry. Election Law Journal, 6(1), 2-35.
22.
GroseC. R. (2011). Congress in Black and White: Race and representation in Washington and at home. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
GuinierLani. (1991). The Triumph of Tokenism: The Voting Rights Act and the Theory of Black Electoral Success.Michigan Law Review, 89(5), 1077-1154.
24.
HeroR. E. (1998). Faces of inequality: Social diversity in American politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
IssacharoffS. (2004). Is section 5 of the Voting Rights Act a victim of its own success?Columbia Law Review, 104, 1710-1731.
27.
JackmanS. (1994). Measuring electoral bias: Australia, 1949-93. British Journal of Political Science, 24, 319-357. doi:10.2307/194252
28.
JamesMichael R. (2011). The Priority of Racial Constituency over Descriptive Representation. The Journal of Politics, 73(3), 899-914. doi: 10.2307/23019462
29.
KaufmannK. M. (2003). Cracks in the rainbow: Group commonality as a basis for Latino and African-American political coalitions. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 199-210. doi:10.2307/3219898
30.
KingG.BrowningR. X. (1987). Democratic representation and partisan bias in congressional elections. The American Political Science Review, 81, 1251-1273. doi:10.2307/1962588
31.
KingW. (1977, March16). Head of city of council leads Atlanta race: Faces John Lewis, a Black leader, in runoff for young’s seat. New York Times, p. 12.
32.
KousserJ. M. (1999). Colorblind injustice: Minority voting rights and the undoing of the second reconstruction. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
33.
KousserJ. M. (2007). The strange, ironic career of section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, 1965-2007. Texas Law Review, 86, 667-774.
LublinD. (1997). The paradox of representation: Racial gerrymandering and minority interests in congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
LublinD. (1999). Racial redistricting and African-American representation: A critique of “do majority-minority districts maximize substantive Black representation in congress?”The American Political Science Review, 93, 183-186. doi:10.2307/2585769
37.
LublinD.BrunellT. L.GrofmanB.HandleyL. (2009). Has the Voting Rights Act outlived its usefulness? In a word, “no.”Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34, 525-553. doi:10.2307/20680256
38.
ManzanoS.SanchezG. R. (2010). Take one for the team? Limits of shared ethnicity and candidate preferences. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 568-580. doi:10.2307/25747959
39.
MichelsonM. R. (2010). Majority-Latino districts and Latino political power. Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 5, 159-175.
40.
MintaM. D.Sinclair-ChapmanV. (2013). Diversity in political institutions and congressional responsiveness to minority interests. Political Research Quarterly, 66, 127-140.
National Conference of State Legislatures. (2009b). Redistricting law 2010. Washington, DC: Author.
43.
ParentiM. (1967). Ethnic politics and the persistence of ethnic identification. The American Political Science Review, 61, 717-726. doi:10.2307/1976090
44.
PeraltaJ. S.LarkinG. R. (2011). Counting those who count: The impact of Latino population growth on redistricting in Southern States. Political Science & Politics, 44, 552-561.
45.
PersilyN. (2007). The promise and pitfalls of the new Voting Rights Act. The Yale Law Journal, 117, 174-254.
46.
SantoroW. A.SeguraG. M. (2011). Generational status and Mexican American political participation: The benefits and limitations of assimilation. Political Research Quarterly, 64, 172-184. doi:10.2307/41058331
47.
SchildkrautD. J. (2012). Which birds of a feather flock together? Assessing attitudes about descriptive representation among Latinos and Asian Americans. American Politics Research, 41, 699-729.
48.
SearsD. O.HettsJ.SidaniusJ.BoboL. (2000). Race in American politics: Framing the debates. In SearsS.SidaniusJ.BoboL. (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 1-43). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
49.
ShahP. (2010). Racing toward representation a hurdle model of Latino incorporation. American Politics Research, 38, 84-109.
50.
SwainC. M. (1993). Black faces, Black interests: The representation of African Americans in congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
TateKatherine. (2001). The Political Representation of Blacks in Congress: Does Race Matter?Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26(4), 623-638. doi: 10.2307/440272
52.
ThernstromA. (1987). Whose votes count?: Affirmative action and minority voting rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
