Recent studies of legislative gridlock espouse the importance of institutional design in separation-of-powers games. However, few scholars have focused on the effects of the adoption of the U.S. Constitution on legislative gridlock. This article attempts to fill that gap by determining whether the Constitution improved the marginal effect of the gridlock interval on the ability to change policy. Results suggest that policy is more responsive to the range of pivotal players (in both the negative and the positive direction) under the Constitution than under the Articles of Confederation, providing empirical evidence that it may be the superior design.
AldrichJ. H. (1995). Why parties?:The origin and transformation of political parties in America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
2.
AldrichJ. H.GrantR. W. (1993). The Antifederalists, the first Congress, and the first parties. The Journal of Politics, 55, 295-326.
3.
AldrichJ. H.JilsonC. C.WilsonR. K. (2002). Why Congress? What the failure of the Confederation Congress and the survival of the Federal Congress tell us about the new institutionalism. In BradyD.McCubbinsM. (Eds.), Party, process, and political change in Congress (pp. 315-342). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
BakerP. (2009, September17). Expand the House?New York Times.
5.
BethR. S. (2005). Entrenchment of Senate procedure and the “Nuclear Option” for change: Possible proceedings and their implications. Congressional Research Service, RL32843.
6.
BradyD. W.VoldenC. (2006). Revolving gridlock: Politics and policy from Jimmy Carter to George W. Bush. Boulder, CO: Westview.
BrownR. H. (1993). Redeeming the republic: Federalists, taxation, and the origins of the Constitution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
9.
ChiouF.RothenbergL. S. (2003). When pivotal politics meets partisan politics. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 503-522.
10.
ChiouF.RothenbergL. S. (2008). Comparing legislators and legislatures: The dynamics of legislative gridlock reconsidered. Political Analysis, 16, 197-212.
11.
CoulsonD. P.JoyceL. (2003). United States state-level population estimates: Colonization to 1999. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.
12.
FergusonJ. E. (1961). The power of the purse: A history of American public finance, 1776-1790. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
13.
FiskC.ChemerinskyE. (1997). The filibuster. Stanford Law Review, 49, 184-254.
14.
FriedrichR. J. (1982). In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 797-833.
15.
GarfinkelM. R.SkaperdasS. (2007). Economics of conflict: An overview. In HartleyK.SandlerT. (Eds.), Handbook of defense economics (Vol. 2, pp. 649-709). New York, NY: Elsevier.
16.
GartnerS. S. (2006). Military personnel on active duty, by branch of service and sex: 1789-1995. In CarterS. B.GartnerS. S.HainesM. R.OlmsteadA. L.SutchR.WrightG. (Eds.), Historical statistics of the United States: Millennial edition (Table Ed 26-47). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HolcombeR. G. (1991). Constitutions as constraints: A case study of three American constitutions. Constitutional Political Economy, 2, 303-328.
18.
JacobsJ. R. (1947). The beginning of the U.S. Army, 1783-1812. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
JillsonC. C.WilsonR. K. (1994). Congressional dynamics: Structure, coordination, and choice in the first American Congress, 1774-1789. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
JensenM. (1965). The new nation: A history of the United States during the confederation 1781-1789. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
21.
KrehbielK. (1998). Pivotal politics: A theory of U.S. lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
LongJ. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
LongJ. S.FreeseJ. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
24.
LordC. (1984). Roll calls of the Continental Congresses and the Congresses of the Confederation, 1777-1789 [Data file]. ICPSR # 7537.
25.
McCartyN. (2009). Presidential vetoes in the early republic: Changing constitutional norms or electoral reform?Journal of Politics, 71, 369-384.
26.
McCormickR. P. (1966). The second American party system: Party formation in the Jacksonian Era. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
27.
McCuskerJ. J. (2006). Gross domestic product: 1650-1800. In CarterS. B.GartnerS. S.HainesM. R.OlmsteadA. L.SutchR.WrightG. (Eds.), Historical statistics of the United States: Millennial edition (Table Eg. 217-222). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
28.
McGowanC. (1986). The president’s veto power: An important instrument of conflict in our constitutional system. San Diego Law Review, 23, 791-822.
29.
MondaleW. F. (2011, January1). Resolved: Fix the filibuster. New York Times.
30.
PitkinT. (1980). A statistical view of the commerce of the United States of America. New York, NY: Goldsmiths Kress Library of Economic Literature No. 21731. (Original work published 1817)
31.
PooleK. T. (2005). Spatial models of parliamentary voting. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
SmithP. H.GephartR. M. (Eds.). (2000). Letters of delegates to Congress, 1774-1789 (Vol. 26). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
33.
SobelR. S. (1999). In defense of the Articles of Confederation and the contribution mechanism as a means of government finance: A general comment on the literature. Public Choice, 99, 347-356.
34.
SpitzerR. J. (1988). The presidential veto: Touchstone of the American presidency. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
35.
StewartR. W. (2005). American military history. Washington, DC: Center of Military History, U.S. Army.
36.
SutchR. (2006). Gross domestic product: 1790-2002. In CarterS. B.GartnerS. S.HainesM. R.OlmsteadA. L.SutchR.WrightG. (Eds.), Historical statistics of the United States: Millennial edition (Table Ca 9-19). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37.
SwiftE. K.BrookshireR. G.CanonD. T.FinkE. C.HibbingJ. R.HumesB. D.. . . MartisK. C. (2000). Database of Congressional historical statistics, 1789-1988 [Data File]. Ann Arbor, MI: ICPSR.
38.
U.S. Printing Office. (1845). The public statutes at large of the United States of America (Vols. 1-4). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
39.
U. S. Printing Office. (1937). Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789 (ed. FordW. C., 34 Vols.). Washington, DC: Author.
40.
U.S. Treasury Department. (1832). American state papers, Military affairs. Washington, DC: Gales and Seaton.
41.
WallisJ. (2006). Federal government finances—revenue, expenditure, and debt: 1789-1939. In CarterS. B.GartnerS. S.HainesM. R.OlmsteadA. L.SutchR.WrightG. (Eds.) Historical statistics of the United States: Millennial edition (Table Ea 584-587). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42.
ZernikeK. (2010, December19). Proposed amendment would enable states to repeal federal law. New York Times.
