This article advances a bounded rationality approach to account for a fundamental challenge in the study of voting behavior; finding a model that allows voters to be driven by both affective partisan attachments and rational issue considerations. Voters choose candidates they feel will perform best on the issues, but on the issues about which they care most, and on the issues as they see them. Party identification acts as the crucial bound on individual rationality, canalizing attention to issues either owned by or successfully leased by their own party and biasing expectations of issue handling. My empirical analysis of the 2008 presidential election shows the recession was a powerful predictor of defection, but rather than valence—was the economy better or worse—what mattered was the level of importance an individual placed on the economy.
AbromowitzA. I. (2006). Explaining Bush’s victory in 2004 (It’s terrorism, stupid!). In KerbelM. R. (Ed.), Get this party started: How progressives can fight back and win (pp. 7-22). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
2.
AldrichJ. H. (1993). Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 246-278.
3.
AnsolabehereS. (2006). Cooperative congressional election study, 2006: Common content (Release 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT. Retrieved from http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/cces/data.
4.
AnsolabehereS. (2008). Cooperative congressional election study, 2008: Common content (Release 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT. Retrieved from http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/cces/data.
5.
AnsolabehereS.RoddenJ.SnyderJ. M.Jr. (2008). The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review, 102, 215-232.
6.
BartelsL. M. (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952-1996. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 35-50.
7.
BeckP. A. (2002). Encouraging political defection: The role of personal discussion networks in partisan desertions to the opposition party and Perot votes in 1992. Political Behavior, 24, 309-337.
8.
BerelsonB.LazarsfeldP. F.McPheeW. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
CampbellA.ConverseP. E.MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
CampbellJ. E. (2000). The American campaign: U.S. presidential elections and the national vote. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
11.
CampbellJ. E. (2008). An exceptional election: Performance, values, and crisis in the 2008 Presidential Election. Forum, 6, 1-20.
12.
ConverseP. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In ApterD. E. (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
13.
CowartA. T. (1973). Electoral choice in the American states: Incumbency effects, partisan forces, and divergent partisan majorities. American Political Science Review, 67, 835-873.
14.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
DobsonD.St. AngeloD. (1975). Party identification and the floating vote: Some dynamics. American Political Science Review, 69, 481-490.
16.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
17.
EnelowJ.HinichM. J. (1984). The spatial theory of voting: An introduction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
18.
EricksonR. S. (2009). The American voter and the economy, 2008. PS: Political Science & Politics, 43, 467-470.
19.
FeldmanS. (2003). Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes. In SearsD. O.HuddyL.JervisR. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477-508). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
FeldmanS.JohnstonC. (2009, September). Understanding political ideology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Toronto, ON, Canada.
21.
FiorinaM. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
FiorinaM. P.AbramsS. J.PopeJ. (2005). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
23.
Gallup poll archive, The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut. Storrs, CT: Author.
24.
GorenP. (2005). Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 882-897.
25.
GroseC. R.OppenheimerB. I. (2007). The Iraq war, partisanship, and candidate attributes: Variation in partisan swing in the 2006 U.S. House elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32, 531-557.
26.
HayesD. (2005). Candidate qualities through a partisan lens: A theory of trait ownership. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 908-923.
27.
HayesD. (2009). Has television personalized voting behavior?Political Behavior, 31, 231-260.
28.
HolbrookT. M. (2009). Economic considerations and the 2008 presidential election. PS: Political Science & Politics, 43, 473-478.
29.
HutchingsV. L. (2003). Public opinion and democratic accountability: How citizens learn about politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
IyengarS.KinderD. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
JesseeS. A. (2009). Spatial voting in the 2004 presidential election. American Political Science Review, 103, 59-81.
32.
JesseeS. A. (2010). Partisan bias, political information and spatial voting in the 2008 presidential election. Journal of Politics, 72, 327-340.
33.
JonesB. D. (2003). Bounded rationality and political science: Lessons from public administration and public policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 359-412.
34.
JonesB. D.BaumgartnerF. R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
JonesB. D.Larsen-PriceH.WilkersonJ. (2009). Representation and American governing institutions. Journal of Politics, 71, 1-14.
36.
KeithB. E.MagelbyD. B.NelsonC. J.OrrE.WestyleM. C.WolfingerR. E. (1986). The partisan affinities of independent “leaners.”British Journal of Political Science, 16, 155-185.
37.
KernellS. (1977). Presidential popularity and negative voting: An alternative explanation of the midterm congressional decline of the president’s party. American Political Science Review, 71, 44-66.
38.
KeyV. O.Jr. (1966). The responsible electorate: Rationality in presidential voting, 1936-1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
KinderD. R. (2003). Communication and politics in the age of information. In SearsD. O.HuddyL.JervisR. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 357-393). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
KrinerD. L.ShenF. X. (2007). Iraq casualties and the 2006 Senate elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32, 507-530.
41.
KrosnickJ. A.KinderD. R. (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming. American Political Science Review, 84, 497-512.
42.
LeeT. (2002). Mobilizing public opinion: Black insurgency and racial attitudes in the civil rights era. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
43.
Lewis-BeckM. S.JacobyW. G.NorpothH.WeisbergH. F. (2008). The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
44.
Lewis-BeckM. S.NadeauR. (2009). Obama and the economy in 2008. PS: Political Science & Politics, 43, 479-483.
45.
LinnS.MoodyJ.AsperS. (2009). Explaining the horse race of 2008. PS: Political Science & Politics, 43, 459-465.
46.
LupiaA.McCubbinsM. D.PopkinS. (2000). Bounded rationality: Reason and the study of politics.” In LupiaA.McCubbinsM. D.PopkinS. (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 1-20). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
47.
LuskinR. C. (1987). Measuring political sophistication. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 856-899.
48.
MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57, 45-57.
49.
PageB. I.ShapiroR. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in America’s policy preferences. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
50.
PasekJ.TahkA.LelkesY.KrosnickJ. A.PayneB. K.AkhtarO.TompsonT. (2009). Determinants of turnout and candidate choice in the 2008 presidential election: Illuminating the impact of racial prejudice and other considerations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 943-994.
51.
PopkinS. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52.
PetrocikJ. R. (1974). An analysis of intransitivites in the index of party identification. Political Methodology, 1, 31-47.
53.
PetrocikJ. R. (1989). An expected party vote: New data for an old concept. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 44-66.
54.
PetrocikJ. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825-850.
55.
PhilpotT. S.ShawD. R.McGowenE. B. (2009). Winning the race: Black voter turnout in the 2008 presidential election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 995-1022.
56.
RedlawskD. P.LauR. R. (2006). I like him, but . . . : Vote choice when candidate likeability and closeness on issues clash. In RedlawskD. P. (Ed.), Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
57.
RiversD.BaileyD. (2009). Inference from matched samples in the 2008 U.S. national elections. Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, 1, 627-39.
58.
SimonH. A. (1995). Rationality in political behavior. Political Psychology, 16, 45-61.
59.
SouthwellP. L. (2009). The effect of nomination divisiveness on the 2008 presidential election. PS: Political Science & Politics, 43, 255-261.
60.
SwedlowB.WyckoffM. L. (2009). Value preferences and ideological structuring of attitudes in American public opinion. American Politics Research, 37, 1048-1087.
61.
TreierS.HillygusD. S. (2009). The nature of political ideology in the contemporary electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 679-703.
62.
VavreckL.RiversD. (2008). The 2006 cooperative congressional elections study. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18, 355-366.
63.
ZallerJ. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
