The past decade has spurred interest in the potential connection between U.S. government monitoring and political activity. Interestingly, these recent studies demonstrate that rather than chilling political activity, government monitoring in the United States positively associates with political engagement. This article seeks to determine why, for ordinary Americans, government monitoring positively relates to political participation. We argue that the balance of discrete negative emotional reactions to government monitoring provides an answer. We propose that U.S. government monitoring generates more anger than anxiety. Furthermore, we suggest that anger about government monitoring will positively associate with political activity whereas anxiety about monitoring will negatively associate with political engagement. We find support for these hypotheses using data drawn from a unique probability sample survey of U.S. residents. The dominant and discrete reaction of anger about monitoring trumps the less common reaction of anxiety, which leads to a net positive association with political activity.
Bartels, L.M. ( 1991). Instrumental and "quasi-instrumental" variables. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 777-800.
4.
Berkowitz, L., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Toward an understanding of the determinants of anger. Emotion, 4, 107-130.
5.
Best, S.J., Krueger, B.S., & Ladewig, J. ( 2006). Privacy in the information age. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 375-401.
6.
Best, S.J., & Krueger, B.S. ( 2008). Political conflict and public perceptions of government surveillance on the internet: An experiment of online search terms. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 5, 191-212.
7.
Brader, T. ( 2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 388-405.
8.
Brader, T. ( 2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How political ads use emotion to sway the electorate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Brader, T., Valentino, N.A., & Suhay, E. ( 2008). What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 959-978.
10.
Cho, W.K.T., Gimpel, J.G., & Wu, T. ( 2006). Clarifying the role of SES in political participation: Policy threat and Arab American mobilization. Journal of Politics , 68, 977-991.
11.
Churchill, W., & Vander Wall, J. (1990). The COINTELPRO papers. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
12.
Conover, P.J., Crewe, I.M., & Searing, D.D. ( 1991). The nature of citizenship in the United States and Great Britain: Empirical comments on theoretical themes. The Journal of Politics, 53, 800-832.
13.
Conover, P.J., & Feldman, S. ( 1986). Emotional responses to the economy. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 50-78.
14.
Damasio, A.R. ( 1994). Descartes error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain . New York: Putnam.
15.
Cunningham, D. ( 2004). There’s something happening here: The New Left, the Klan, and FBI counterintelligence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Davis, D.W., & Silver, B.D. ( 2004). Civil liberties vs. security: Public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 28-46.
17.
Donner, F.J. ( 1980). The age of surveillance. New York : Knopf.
18.
Ellsworth, P.C., & Smith, C.A. ( 1988). From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 271-302.
19.
Finifter, A.W. ( 1974). The friendship group as a protective environment for political deviants. The American Political Science Review , 68, 607-625.
20.
Foucault, M. ( 1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
21.
Frijda, N.H. ( 1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Gibson, J.L. ( 1992). The political consequences of intolerance: Cultural conformity and political freedom. American Political Science Review, 86, 338-356.
23.
Gibson, J.L. ( 2006). Enigmas of intolerance: Fifty years after Stouffer’s communism, conformity, and civil liberties. Perspectives on Politics, 4, 21-34.
24.
Gibson, J.L. ( 2008). Intolerance and political repression in the United States: A half century after McCarthyism. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 96-108.
25.
Gross, K., & D’Ambrosio, L. (2004). Framing emotional response . Political Psychology, 25, 1-29.
26.
Gurr, T.R. ( 1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Allen, J.J.B. ( 1998). Anger and frontal brain activity: EEG asymmetry consistent with approach motivation despite negative affect valence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1310-1316.
28.
Hayes, A.F., Scheufele, D.A., & Huge, M. ( 2006). Nonparticipation as self-censorship: Publicly-observable political activity in a polarized opinion climate. Political Behavior, 28, 259-283.
29.
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. ( 1988). Choice, social structure, and political information: The informational coercion of minorities. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 467-482.
30.
Huddy, L., Feldman, S., & Cassese, E. ( 2007). On the distinct political effects of anxiety and anger . In W. R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, A. Crigler , & M. MacKuen.The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 202-230). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Taber, C., & Lahav, G. ( 2005). Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies . American Journal of Political Science, 49, 593-608.
32.
Iyer, A., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. ( 2007). Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame, and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 572-587.
33.
Izard, C.E. ( 1991). The psychology of emotions. New York : Plenum.
34.
Keeter, S., Miller, C., Kohut, A., Groves, R.M., & Presser, S. ( 2000). Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 125-148.
35.
King, M.L., Jr. ( 1960). Pilgrimage to nonviolence. Christian Century, 77, 439-441.
36.
Krueger, B.S. ( 2005). Government surveillance and political participation on the internet. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 439-452.
37.
Krueger, B.S. ( 2008). Resisting government internet surveillance by participating in politics online and offline. In T. Loendorf & G. D. Garson, Patriotic information systems (pp. 129-152). Hershey, PA: IGI.
38.
Kuklinski, J.H., Riggle, E., Ottati, V., Schwarz, N., & Wyer, R.S., Jr. (1991). The cognitive and affective bases of political tolerance judgments. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 1-27.
39.
Lazarus, R.S. ( 1993). From psychological stress to the emotion: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 1-21.
40.
Leighley, J.E. ( 1995). Attitudes, opportunities, and incentives: A field essay on political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 48, 181-209.
41.
Lerner, J.S., & Keltner, D. ( 2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146-159.
42.
Lichtblau, E. ( 2005, December 20). FBI watched activist groups, new files show . New York Times, pp. 1-2.
43.
Locke, J. ( 2003). Two treatises of government and a letter concerning toleration . Binghamton, NY: Vail-Ballou.
44.
Marcus, G.E. ( 2002). The sentimental citizen emotion in democratic politics . University Park: Penn State Press .
45.
Marcus, G.E., & MacKuen, M. ( 1993). Anxiety, enthusiasm and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. American Political Science Review, 87, 688-701.
46.
Marcus, G.E., MacKuen, M., Wolak, J., & Keele, L. ( 2006). The measure and mismeasure of emotion. In D. Redlawsk (Ed.), Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing (pp. 31-45). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
47.
Marcus, G.E., Neuman, W.R., & MacKuen, M. ( 2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Miller, J.M., & Krosnick, J.A. (2004). Threat as a motivator of political activism: A field experiment. Political Psychology , 25, 507-523.
49.
Morinaga, K., Akiyoshi, J., Matsushita, H., Ichioka, S., Tanaka, Y., Tsuru, J., et al. (2007). Anticipatory anxiety-induced changes in human lateral prefrontal cortex activity. Biological Psychology , 74, 34-38.
50.
Paine, T. ( 1944). The complete writings of Thomas Paine. New York: Citadel.
51.
Redlawsk, D.P., Civettini, A., & Lau, R.R. ( 2007). Affective intelligence and voting: Information processing and learning in a campaign. In W. R. Neuman , G. E. Marcus, A. Crigler, & M. B. MacKuen (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in thinking and behavior (pp. 152-179). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
Rosenstone, S.J., & Hansen, J.M. ( 1993). Mobilization, participation and democracy in America . New York: Macmillan.
53.
Singer, E., Mathiowetz, N.A., & Couper, M.P. ( 1993). The impact of privacy and confidentiality concerns on survey participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 465-482.
54.
Stock, J.H., & Yogo, M. ( 2005). Testing for weak instruments in linear iv regression . In D. W. K. Andrews, & J. H. Stock (Eds.), Identification and inference for econometric models: Essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg (pp. 80-108). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Valentino, N.A., Gregorowicz, K., & Groenendyk, E. (2009). Efficacy, emotions and the habit of participation. Political Behavior, 31, 307-330.
56.
Valentino, N.A., Hutchings, V.L., Gregorowicz, K., Groenendyk, E., & Brader, T. ( 2006). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of anger versus anxiety in political participation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association , Philadelphia.
57.
Valentino, N.A., Hutchings, V.L., Banks, A.J., & Davis, A.K. ( 2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology, 29, 247-273.
58.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., & Brady, H. ( 1995). Voice and equality. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
59.
Westin, A.F. ( 1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Antheneum.
60.
Wolak, J., MacKuen, M., Keele, L., Marcus, G.E., & Russell Neuman, W. (2003). How the emotions of public policy affect citizen engagement and public deliberation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association , Chicago.
61.
Wolak, J., & Marcus, G.E. ( 2007). Personality and emotional response: Strategic and tactical responses to changing political circumstances. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 614, 172-195.
