We examine the first 3 years of San Francisco's instant-runoff voting (IRV) elections to determine whether some voters adapt more easily than others to the more complex ballot and decision task. We draw on studies of uncounted votes to develop hypotheses about tendencies to undervote, overvote, and rank candidates in IRV elections. Individual ballot records and precinct-level census data are used to estimate the relative influences of demographic and election-specific factors. A natural experiment tests whether or not prior experience with IRV makes a difference. The change to IRV appears to have increased the rate of overvotes and decreased tendencies to undervote. Both behaviors are explained by demographics and aspects of the electoral environment. Meanwhile, tendencies to rank candidates were shaped less by demographics and more by contextual factors and prior exposure to IRV. The findings extend the literature on uncounted votes, inform issues of equality in elections, and provide practical insights on this type of electoral reform.
Ansolabehere, S., & Stewart, C. (2005). Residual votes attributable to technology. Journal of Politics, 67, 365-389.
2.
Arbour, B.K., & Hayes, D. (2005). Voter turnout in the California recall: Where did the increase come from? American Politics Research, 33, 187-215.
3.
Berinsky, A.J. (2005). The perverse consequences of electoral reform in the United States. American Politics Research, 33, 471-491.
4.
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2006, July). Election reform in the US and problems of measuring institutional change. Paper presented at the Montreal Conference on Electoral Reform, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Retrieved July 27, 2007, from http://www.crcee.umontreal.ca/pdf/Bowler.pdf
5.
Bullock, C.S., & Dunn, R.E. (1996). Election roll-off; A test of three explanations . Urban Affairs, 32, 71-86.
6.
Bullock, C.S., & Hood, M.V. (2002). One person-no vote; one vote; two votes: Voting methods, ballot types, and undervote frequency in the 2000 presidential election . Social Science Quarterly, 83, 981-993.
7.
City and County of San Francisco. (2008). City and County of San Francisco 1996 Charter. Retrieved July, 28, 2007, from http://www.municode.com/Resources/gateway.asp?pid=14130&sid=5
8.
Cole, R.L., Taebel, D.A., & Engstrom R.L. (1990). Cumulative voting in a municipal election: A note on voter reactions and electoral consequences. Western Political Quarterly, 43, 191-199.
9.
Darcy, R., & Schneider, A. (1989). Confusing ballots, roll-off, and the Black vote . Western Political Quarterly, 42, 347-364.
10.
DeLeon, R., & Latterman, D. (2004). Updating the new Progressive Voting Index (PVI), with tables, map, and precinct scores. Retrieved June 18, 2007 , from http://www.sfusualsuspects.com/DeLeon%20Files/DeLeon%20Latterman%20New%20PVI%20Report%20April%202004.pdf
11.
Delli Carpini, M.X., & Keeter, S. (2000). Gender and political knowledge. In S. Tolleson-Rinehart & J. J. Josephson (Eds.), Gender and American politics (pp. 21-52). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
12.
Engstrom, R.L., & Barrilleaux, C.J. (1991). Native Americans and cumulative voting: The Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux. Social Science Quarterly , 72, 388-393.
13.
Engstrom, R.L., Kirksey, J.F., & Still, E. (1997). One person, seven votes: The cumulative voting experience in Chilton County, Alabama. In A. Peacock (Ed.), Affirmative action and representation: Shaw v. Reno and the future of voting rights (pp. 285-316). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
14.
FairVote. Sample ballot from 2004 San Francisco Board of Supervisors District 5 election. Retrieved January 17, 2008, from http://www.fairvote.org/media/irv/2004rcvballot.pdf
15.
Feddersen, T., & Pesendorfer, W. (1996). The swing voter's curse . American Economic Review, 86, 408-424.
16.
Ghirardato, P., & Katz, J. (2002). Indecision theory: Quality of information and voting behavior (California Institute of Technology social science working paper). Retrieved December 27, 2007, from http://web.econ.unito.it/gma/paolo/voting-iv.pdf
17.
Hecock, D.S., & Bain, H.M., Jr. (1956). The arrangement of names on the ballot and its effect on the voter's choice. Detroit, MI : Wayne University Press.
18.
Herron, M.C., & Sekhon, J.S. (2005). Black candidates and Black voters: Assessing the impact of candidate race on uncounted vote rates. Journal of Politics, 67, 154-177.
19.
Jansen, H.J. (2004). The political consequences of the alternative vote: Lessons from western Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 37, 647-669.
20.
Kimball, D.C., & Kropf, M. (2005). Ballot design and unrecorded votes on paper ballots . Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 508-529.
21.
Kimball, D.C., Owens, C.T., & Keeney, K.M. (2004). Unrecorded votes and political representation . In R. P. Watson (Ed.), Counting votes: Lessons from the 2000 presidential election in Florida (pp. 135-152). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
22.
Knack, S., & Kropf, M. (2003). Voided ballots in the 1996 presidential election: A county-level analysis. Journal of Politics, 65, 881-897.
23.
Krosnick, J.A., Miller, J.M., & Tichy, M.P. (2004). An unrecognized need for ballot reform: Effects of candidate name order. In A. N. Crigler , M. R. Just, & E. J. McCaffery (Eds.), Rethinking the vote: The politics and prospects of American election reform (pp. 51-74). New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Long, J.S., & Freese, J. (2001). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Reilly, B., & Maley, M. (2000). The single transferable vote and the alternative vote compared. In S. Bowler & B. Grofman (Eds.), Elections in Australia, Ireland, Malta under the single transferable vote (pp. 37-58). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
26.
Sinclair, D.E., & Alvarez, R.M. (2004). Who overvotes, who undervotes, using punchcards? Evidence from Los Angeles County. Political Research Quarterly , 57, 15-25.
27.
Stiefbold, R.P. (1965). The significance of void ballots in West German elections. American Political Science Review, 59, 391-407.
28.
Tomz, M., & Van Houweling, R.P. (2003). How does voting equipment affect the racial gap in voided ballots? American Journal of Political Science, 47, 46-60.
29.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2000). Decennial census of population and housing, Summary Files 1, 2, and 3. Retrieved January 10, 2008, from http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en
30.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2006). 2006 American Community Survey. Retrieved January 10, 2008, from http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en
31.
Vanderleeuw, J.M., & Liu, B. (2002). Political empowerment, mobilization, and Black voter roll-off. Urban Affairs Review, 37, 380-396.
32.
Vanderleeuw, J.M., & Sowers, T.T. (2007). Race, roll-off, and racial transition: The influence of political change on racial group voter roll-off in urban elections. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 937-952.
33.
Vanderleeuw, J.M., & Utter, G. (1993). Voter roll-off and the electoral context: A test of two theses. Social Science Quarterly, 74, 664-673.
34.
Walker, J. (1966). Ballot forms and voter fatigue: An analysis of the office block and party column ballots. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 10, 448-464.
35.
Wattenberg, M.P., McAllister, I., & Salvanto, A. (2000). How voting is like taking an SAT test: An analysis of American voter rolloff. American Politics Research, 28, 234-250.
36.
Wolfinger, R., & Rosenstone, S. (1980). Who votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
