In this article, I explore the role that “reception” of Supreme Court cases plays in attitude change. By reception, I mean that individuals must be exposed to and understand Court cases to be influenced by them. I conducted a quasi-experiment during June 2005 to test whether receiving McCreary v. ACLU and Van Orden v. Perry increases the probability of attitude change on public displays of the Ten Commandments. I also examine the relationships among receiving cases, preexisting beliefs, source credibility, and attitude change. I find that receiving McCreary is associated with less support for the unconstitutional Kentucky display. Also, the effect of receiving Van Orden is related to one's preexisting beliefs.
Brickman, D., & Peterson, D.A.M. (2006). Public reaction to repeated events: Citizen response to multiple Supreme Court abortion decisions. Political Behavior, 28, 87-112.
6.
Caldeira, G. (1991). Courts and public opinion. In J. Gates & C. Johnson (Eds.), The American courts (pp. 303-334). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
7.
Caldeira, G., & Gibson, J.L. (1992). The etiology of public support for the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 560-577.
Casey, G. (1974). The Supreme Court and myth: An empirical investigation . Law & Society Review, 8, 385-420.
10.
Clawson, R.A., & Waltenburg, E.N. (2003). Support for a Supreme Court decision: A story in black and white. American Politics Research , 31, 251-279.
11.
Dahl, R. (1957). Decision-making in a democracy: The Supreme Court as a national policy maker. Journal of Public Law, 6, 279-295.
12.
Epstein, L., & Segal, J.A. (2000). Measuring issue salience. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 66-83.
13.
Erikson, R.S., MacKuen, M.B., & Stimson, J.A. (2002). The macro polity. New York : Cambridge University Press.
14.
Fiske, S., & Taylor, S.B. (1991). Social cognition. New York : McGraw-Hill.
15.
Flemming, R.B., Bohte, J., & Wood, B.D. (1997). One voice among many: The Supreme Court's influence on attentiveness to issues in the United States, 1947-1992. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 1224-1225.
16.
Franklin, C.H., & Kosaki, L.C. (1989). Republican schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, public opinion, and abortion. American Political Science Review , 83, 751-771.
17.
Gibson, J.L., Caldeira, G.A., & Spence, L.K. (2003). The Supreme Court and the US presidential election of 2000: Wounds, self-inflicted or otherwise?British Journal of Political Science, 33, 535-556.
Grosskopf, A., & Mondak, J.J. (1998). Do attitudes toward specific Supreme Court decisions matter? The impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on public confidence in the Supreme Court. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 633-654.
20.
Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 358-268.
21.
Hoekstra, V.J. (1995). The Supreme Court and opinion change-An experimental-study of the Court's ability to change opinion. American Politics Quarterly, 23, 109-129.
22.
Hoekstra, V.J. (2000). The Supreme Court and local public opinion. American Political Science Review, 94, 89-100.
23.
Hoekstra, V.J. (2003). Public reactions to Supreme Court decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Hoekstra, V.J., & Segal, J.A. (1996). The shepherding of local public opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb's Chapel. Journal of Politics, 58, 1079-1102.
25.
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D.R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American public opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Johnson, J., & Joslyn, R. (1995). Political science research methods. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
27.
Johnson, T.R., & Martin, A.D. (1998). The public's conditional response to Supreme Court decisions. American Political Science Review, 92, 299-309.
28.
King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 347-361.
29.
Larson, S.G. (1985). How the New York Times covered discrimination cases. Journalism Quarterly, 62, 894-896.
30.
Larson, S.G. (1995). The content of Supreme Court coverage: Making sense of the relationship between the media and public confidence. Southeastern Political Review.
31.
Lawrence and Garner v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
32.
Lodge, M., McGraw, K.M., & Stroh, P. (1989). An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation . American Political Science Review, 83, 399-420.
33.
Marshall, T.R. (1988). Policymaking and the modern Court: When do Supreme Court rulings prevail? Western Politics Quarterly, 16, 296-316.
34.
Marshall, T.R. (1989). Public opinion and the Supreme Court. New York: Longman.
35.
McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky, 545 U.S. 844 (2005).
36.
McGuire, K.T., & Stimson, J.A. (2004). The least dangerous branch revisited: New evidence on Supreme Court responsiveness to public preferences. Journal of Politics, 66, 1018-1035.
37.
Mishler, W., & Sheehan, R.S. (1993). The Supreme Court as a countermajoritarian institution? The impact of public opinion on Supreme Court decisions. American Political Science Review, 87, 87-101.
38.
Mishler, W., & Sheehan, R.S. (1996). Public opinion, the attitudinal model, and Supreme Court decision-making: A micro-analytic perspective. Journal of Politics, 58, 169-200.
39.
Mondak, J.J. (1990). Perceived legitimacy of Supreme Court decisions: Three functions of source credibility. Political Behavior , 12, 363-383.
40.
Mondak, J.J. (1994). Policy legitimacy and the Supreme Court: The sources and contexts of legitimation. Politics Research Quarterly , 47, 675-692.
41.
Mondak, J.J., & Smithey, S.I. (1997). The dynamics of public support for the Supreme Court. Journal of Politics, 59, 1114-1142.
42.
Murphy, W.F., & Tannenhaus, J. (1968). Public opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court: Mapping of some prerequisites for Court legitimation of regime changes. Law and Society Review, 2, 357-382.
43.
Norpoth, H., Segal, J.A., Mishler, W., & Sheehan, R.S. (1994). Popular influence on Supreme Court decisions. American Political Science Review, 88, 711-724.
44.
Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
45.
Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades' evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243-281.
46.
Price, V., & Romantan, R. (2004). Confidence in institutions before during and after "Indecision 2000." Journal of Politics, 66, 939-956.
47.
Price, V., & Zaller, J. (1993). Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their impacts for research. Public Opinion Quarterly , 57, 133-164.
48.
Prior, M. (2005, September). Warning: Use of media exposure measure may cause serious side effects, or: The pitfalls of self-reported news exposure . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
49.
Rosenberg, G. (1991). The hollow hope: Can the courts bring about social change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
Segal, J.A., & Spaeth, H.J. (2002). The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited . New York: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Segal, J.A., Spaeth, H.J., & Benesh, S. (2005). The Supreme Court in the American legal system . New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Slotnick, E.E., & Segal, J.A. (1998). Television news and the Supreme Court: All the news that's fit to air?New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Stimson, J.A., MacKuen, M.B., & Erikson, R.S. (1995). Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review, 89, 543-565.
54.
Stoutenborough, J.W., Haider-Markel, D.P., & Allen, M.D. (2006). Reassessing the impact of Supreme Court decisions on public opinion: Gay and civil rights cases. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 419-433.
55.
Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2003, January). CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results (Version 2.1). Retrieved June 10, 2005, from http://gking.harvard.edu/
56.
Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005).
57.
Wlezien, C.B., & Goggin, M.L. (1993). The courts, interest groups, and public opinion about abortion. Political Behavior, 15, 381-408.
58.
Wyer, R.S., & Srull, T.K. (1986). Human cognition in its social context. Psychological Review, 93, 322-59.
59.
Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
