Studies of the 1970s and 1980s viewed the political party insiders as having little influence on the selection of the presidential nominees. Recent studies, however, find a significant effect for party elite endorsements in presidential nomination campaigns. This study presents a theory of elite influence in the postreform presidential nomination system and analyzes patterns of elite party endorsements to address questions of when and why elites converge on a preferred candidate. Both party- and candidate-centric factors appear to affect elite endorsements of presidential candidates. Elite elected officials are mainly motivated to have a nominee with electoral appeal. Fewer elite Democratic elected officials endorse presidential candidates, they endorse later, and they tend to divide their endorsements among the presidential candidates to a greater degree than do elite Republican elected officials.
Adkins, R.E., & Dowdle, A.J. (2001). Is the exhibition season becoming more important to forecasting presidential nominations? American Politics Research, 29, 283-288.
2.
Adkins, R.E., & Dowdle, A.J. (2002). The money primary: What influences the outcome of presidential nomination fundraising? Presidential Studies Quarterly, 32, 256-275.
3.
Adkins, R.E., & Dowdle, A.J. (2004). Bumps in the road to the White House: How influential were campaign resources to nominating George W. Bush?Journal of Political Marketing, 3, 1-27.
4.
Adkins, R.E., Dowdle, A.J., & Steger, W.P. (2006, August). Progressive ambition, opportunism, and the presidency, 1972-2008. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
5.
Apple, R.W. (1992, April 10). Like voters, superdelegates have doubts about Clinton. New York Times.
6.
Bartels, L.M. (1988). Presidential primaries and the dynamics of public choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Berke, R.L. (1996, March 14). Variety of motives in making of endorsements . New York Times.
8.
Bimber, B., & Davis, R. (2003). Campaigning online: The Internet in US elections . New York: Oxford University Press .
9.
Boynton, G.R., & Lodge, M.L. (1994). Voters' images of candidates. In A. H. Miller & B. E. Gronbeck (Eds.), Presidential campaigns and American self images (pp. 176-189). Boulder, CO: Westview .
10.
Broder, D.S. (1972). The party's over: The failure of politics in America . New York: Harper & Row.
11.
Broder, D.S. (1999, March 8). Showy bandwagon is no free ride to a Bush nomination. Washington Post.
12.
Butler, R.L. (2004). Claiming the mantle: How presidential nominations are won and lost before the votes are cast. Boulder, CO : Westview.
13.
Cillizza, C. (2006, February 3). The Friday line: Winning the 2008 money primary. Washington Post.
14.
Cohen, M., Karol, D.Noel, H., & Zaller, J.R. (2003). Polls or pols: The real driving force behind presidential nominations. Brooking Review, 3, 36-39.
15.
Cohen, M., Karol, D., Noel, H., & Zaller, J.R. (2005, September). Mass politics vs. party autonomy: The dynamics of the invisible primary in presidential nominations, 1980-2004. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
16.
Crotty, W., & Jackson, J.S. (1985). Presidential primaries and nominations. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
17.
David, P.T., Goldman, R.M., & Bain, R.C. (1960). The politics of the party conventions. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
18.
Dionne, E.J., Jr. (1987, June 29). The candidate who isn't there: Nonrunners cast shadow on '88. New York Times.
19.
Dowdle, A.J., Adkins, R.E., & Steger, W.P. (2007, September). The viability primary: Modeling candidate support before the primaries. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
20.
Dunteman, G.H. (1989). Principal components analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Embrey, G. (1995, March 17). Davidson, Aronoff back Dole; Endorsements boost senator's presidential bid in Ohio. Columbus Dispatch .
22.
Garramone, G. (1985). Effects of negative political advertising: the roles of sponsor and rebuttal. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 29, 147-159.
23.
Gimpel, J.G. (1998). Packing heat at the polls: Gun ownership, interest group endorsements, and voting behavior in gubernatorial elections. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 634-648.
24.
Gopoian, J.D. (1982). Issue preferences and candidate choice in presidential primaries. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 523-546.
25.
Held, D. (1987). Models of democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
Herrera, R. (1995). The crosswinds of change: Sources of change in Democratic and Republican parties. Political Research Quarterly , 48, 291-312.
27.
Hull, C.C. (2005). How presidential candidates win state nomination contests: Explaining and predicting the Iowa caucus. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
28.
Ifill, G. (1992, April 30). Clinton goes to the capitol seeking democrats' favor. New York Times.
29.
Jamieson, K.H., Johnston, R. & Hagen, M.G. (2000). The 2000 nominating campaign: Endorsements, attacks, and debates (Research report). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg Public Policy Center.
Keeter, S., & Zukin, C. (1983). Uninformed choice: The failure of the new presidential nomination system. New York: Praeger .
32.
Kenney, P.J. (1993). An examination of how voters form impressions of candidates' issue positions during the nomination campaign. Political Behavior, 315, 265-288.
33.
Kirkpatrick, J.J. (1976). The new presidential elite. New York: Russell Sage.
34.
Mayer, W.G. (1996a). The divided democrats: Ideological unity, party reform, and presidential elections. Boulder, CO: Westview.
35.
Mayer, W.G. (1996b). Forecasting presidential elections. In W. G. Mayer (Ed.), In pursuit of the White House (pp. 44-71). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
36.
Mayer, W.G., & Busch, A.E. (2004). The front-loading problem in presidential nominations . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution .
37.
Merrion, P. (1995, May 1). Local money machine gets cranking for Bob Dole. Crain's Chicago Business.
38.
Newport, F. (1999, November). Republican frontrunner one year before presidential election almost always has won nomination. Gallup Monthly, pp. 10-11.
39.
Norrander, B. (2006). The attrition game: Initial resources, initial contests and the exit of candidates during the US presidential primary season . British Journal of Political Science, 36, 487-507.
40.
Novak, R. (2006, December 14). Is GOP '08 choice already written in inc.?Chicago Sun Times.
41.
Patterson, T.E. (1980). The mass media election. New York: Praeger.
42.
Peffley, M. (1984). The voter as juror: Attributing responsibility for economic conditions. Political Behavior, 6, 275-294.
43.
Petrocik, J.R. (1995). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825-850.
44.
Polsby, N.W. (1983). Consequences of party reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
Popkin, S.L. (1991). The reasoning voter. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
46.
Reiter, H.L. (1985). Selecting the president: The nominating process in transition. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
47.
Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: Allen and Unwin.
48.
Shaw, D.R., & Sparrow, B.H. (1999). From the inner ring out: News congruence, cue-taking and campaign coverage. Political Research Quarterly, 52, 323-351.
49.
Steger, W.P. (2000). Do primary voters draw from a stacked deck? Presidential nominations in an era of candidate-centered campaigns. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 30, 725-751.
50.
Steger, W.P. (2007a, September). Ideological information in candidate endorsements for presidential Nominations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association , Chicago.
51.
Steger, W.P. (2007b). Who wins nominations and why? An updated forecast of the presidential primary vote. Political Research Quarterly , 60, 91-99.
52.
Steger, W.P., Adkins, R.E., & Dowdle, A. (2004). Partisan differences in the exhibition season and New Hampshire primary. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 375-390.
53.
Steger, W.P., & Davis, A. (2000, November). Candidate endorsements in presidential nominating campaigns. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.
54.
Steger, W.P., Dowdle, A.J., & Adkins, R.E. (2005, October). State of the primaries. Paper presented at the State of the Parties Conference, Bliss Center for the Study of Policy and Politics, Akron, OH.
55.
Steger, W.P., Hickman, J., & Yohn, K. (2002). Candidate competition and attrition in presidential primaries, 1912-2000. American Politics Research, 30, 528-554.
56.
Stone, W.J., Rapoport, R., & Atkeson, L.R. (1995). A simulation model of presidential nomination choice. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 135-61.
57.
Stonecash, J.M., Mariani, M.D., & Brewer, M.D. (2002). Diverging parties: Social change, realignment and party polarization. Boulder, CO: Westview.
58.
Taylor, P. (1987, March 13). Politicians refuse rides on Hart's bandwagon . Washington Post.
59.
Wattier, M.J. (1983). Ideological voting in 1980 republican presidential primaries. Journal of Politics, 45, 1016-1026.
60.
Wilcox, C. (1991). Financing the 1988 prenomination campaign. In E. H. Buell, Jr., & L. Sigelman (Eds.), Nominating the president (pp. 91-118). Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
61.
Williams, C.B., Foxman, E.R., & Gulati, J. (in press). What's in an endorsement? An analysis of endorsement use on the websites of presidential candidates and organizations in 2004. Journal of Political Marketing.
62.
Winneker, C. (1991, December 12). Some members already endorsing for president, but most temporize. Roll Call.
63.
Zaller, J.R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
