As viewer numbers of national news have declined, local news has grown in importance as a source of political information. Yet prominent research into its effects concludes that its impact on political attitudes and behavior is minor. We theorize and demonstrate that the influence of local news may be indirect and subtle but nevertheless important. Using multiple methods, we show a clear relationship between perceptions of campaign rhetoric and watching local news, even when controlling for individual-level characteristics; this response, in turn, has an indirect effect on turnout. We explain this finding as a combination of the “mean social world” presented by local news, the nature of political coverage, and the perception of local news stations as simply another player in the campaign. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of our results for the role of local news in politics and what might be done to make its contribution more positive.
Alger, D.
,
Allen, B.
,
Stevens, D.
, &
Sullivan, J.
(2005, January).
Principles, partisanship, and perceptions of political advertising
. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Politics Group of the Political Studies Association, Canterbury, UK.
2.
Allen, B.
,
O'Loughlin, P.
,
Jasperson, A.
, &
Sullivan, J.
(1994).
The media and the Gulf War: Framing, priming, and the spiral of silence
. Polity, 27,
255-284
.
3.
American National Election Survey.
(2004). The 2004 National Election Study [Data file].
Ann Arbor : University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies
. Available from http://www.electionstudies.org
4.
Ansolabehere, S.
, &
Iyengar, S.
(1995). Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate.
New York: Free Press
.
5.
Bartels, L.
(1998). Campaign reform: Insights and evidence: A report of the task force on campaign reform.
Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs
.
6.
Cappella, J.
, &
Jamieson, K.H.
(1994).
Broadcast adwatch effects: A field experiment
. Communication Research, 21,
342-365
.
7.
Chang, L.
, &
Krosnick, J.
(2003).
Measuring the frequency of regular behaviors: Comparing the “typical week” to the “past week
.” Sociological Methodology, 33,
55-80
.
8.
Dearing, J.
, &
Rogers, E.
(1996). Agenda setting.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
9.
Delli Carpini, M.
, &
Keeter, S.
(1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
.
10.
Franklin, C.
,
Fowler, E.F.
,
Goldstein, K.
, &
Stevens, D.
(2003, August).
Political information flows and their effects in the 2002 elections
. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
11.
Freedman, P.
, &
Lawton, L.D.
(2000, April).
Campaign advertising, perceived fairness, and voter turnout
. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
12.
Geer, J.
(2006). In defense of negativity: Attack ads in presidential campaigns.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press
.
13.
Gerbner, G.
,
Gross, L.
,
Morgan, M.
, &
Signorelli, N.
(1980).
The mainstreaming of America: Violence profile No. 11
. Journal of Communication, 30,
10-29
.
14.
Gilliam, F.
, &
Iyengar, S.
(2000).
Prime suspects: The influence of local television on the viewing public
. American Journal of Political Science, 44,
560-573
.
15.
Graber, D.
(2001). Mass media and American politics (6th ed.).
Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press
.
16.
Hawkins, R.
, &
Pingree, S.
(1981).
Uniform messages and habitual viewing: Unnecessary assumptions in social reality effects
. Human Communication Research, 7,
291-301
.
17.
Hetherington, M.
(1996).
The media's role in forming voters' national economic evaluations in 1992
. American Journal of Political Science, 40,
372-395
.
18.
Iyengar, S.
(1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issuesChicago: University of Chicago Press
.
19.
Iyengar, S.
(1998, September). “
Media effects”: Paradigms for the analysis of local television news
. Paper prepared for the Annie E. Casey Foundation planning meeting, Center for Communications and Community.
20.
Iyengar, S.
, &
Kinder, D.
(1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press
.
21.
Jamieson, K.H.
(1992). Dirty politics: Deception, distraction, and democracy.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
22.
Jamieson, K.H.
(2000). Everything you think you know about politics. . . and why you're wrong.
New York: Basic Books
.
23.
Kahn, K.F.
, &
Kenney, P.
(1999).
Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation
. American Political Science Review, 93,
877-890
.
24.
Kahn, K.F.
, &
Kenney, P.
(2004). No holds barred: Negativity in U.S. Senate campaigns.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
.
25.
Kaplan, M.
,
Goldstein, K.
, &
Hale, M.
(2005a). Spanish language TV coverage of the 2004 campaigns (Report of the Lear Center Local News Archive).
Los Angeles
/
Madison: University of Southern California Annenberg School, University of Wisconsin
.
26.
Kaplan, M.
,
Goldstein, K.
, &
Hale, M.
(2005b). Local news coverage of the 2004 campaigns: An analysis of nightly broadcasts in 11 markets (Report of the Lear Center Local News Archive).
Los Angeles
/
Madison : University of Southern California Annenberg School
,
University of Wisconsin
.
27.
Lau, R.
, &
Pomper, G.
(2000, August).
Accentuate the negative? Effectiveness of negative campaigning in U.S. Senate elections
. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
28.
McGill, L.
,
Szanto, A.
, &
Johnston, M.
(1997).
The voters speak: Findings from the Media Studies Center's voters and media research project
. In J. Mashek, L. McGill, & A. Clayton Powell III (Eds.), Lethargy '96: How the media covered a listless campaign (pp. 98-111). Arlington, VI: The Freedom Forum.
29.
Miller, W.
, &
Shanks, J.M.
(1996). The new American voter.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
30.
Patterson, T.
(1993). Out of order.
New York: Knopf
.
31.
Patterson, T.
, &
McClure, R.
(1976). The unseeing eye: The myth of television power in national politics.
New York: Putnam
.
32.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.
(2004, January). Cable and Internet loom large in fragmented political universe [Press release].
Washington, DC: Author
.
33.
Popkin, S.
(2006).
Changing media, changing politics
. Perspectives on Politics, 4,
327-341
.
34.
Robinson, M.
(1976).
Public affairs television and the growth of political malaise: The case of “The selling of the Pentagon
.” American Political Science Review, 70,
409-432
.
35.
Stevens, D.
,
Alger, D.
,
Allen, B.
, &
Sullivan, J.
(2006).
Local news coverage in a social capital capital: Election 2000 on Minnesota's local news stations
. Political Communication, 23,
61-84
.
