The article examines the role of public opinion during the California governor’s recall in 2003 compared to partisanship and ideology. In the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) Statewide Surveys, most Californians reported that their state was headed in the wrong direction, whereas relatively few said that they trusted state government, and most said that they disapproved of the way the governor was handling his job. Californians reported that they liked the recall process in concept, and about one half said that they were pleased with its current use and satisfied with the replacement candidates. The author finds that public support for the recall was consistent over time and related to negative political attitudes and positive recall attitudes when controlling for other factors. The implications for the future use and success of recalls and on what political science has to say about the role of populism and partisanship in the direct democracy movement are discussed.
Baldassare, M. (2000). California in the new millennium: The changing social and political landscape. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
Baldassare, M. (2002). A California state of mind: The conflicted voter in a changing world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Baldassare, M., Cain, B., Apollonio, D., & Cohen, J. (2004). The season of our discontent: Voters’ views on California elections. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
4.
Baldassare, M., Cain, B., & Cohen, J. (2003, November). California voters take charge: the 2003 recall. California Journal, 34(11), 14-18.
5.
Banducci, S. (1998). Searching for ideological consistency in direct legislation voting. In S. Bowler, T. Donovan, & C. Tolbert (Eds.), Citizens as legislators: direct democracy in the United States (pp. 132-148). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
6.
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2000). Demanding choices: Opinion, voting, and direct democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7.
Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Tolbert, C. (1998). Citizens as legislators: direct democracy in the United States. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
8.
Broder, D. (2000). Democracy derailed. New York: Harcourt Brace.
9.
Cain, B., & Noll, R. (1995). Constitutional reform in California. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.
10.
California Secretary of State. (2002, November). Statement of the vote. Sacramento: State of California.
11.
California Secretary of State. (2003a). Elections calendar: Statewide special election, October 7, 2003. Sacramento: State of California.
12.
California Secretary of State. (2003b). Frequently asked questions about recalls. Sacramento: State of California.
13.
California Secretary of State. (2003c, October). Statement of the vote. Sacramento: State of California.
14.
Cronin, T. (1999). Direct democracy: The politics of initiative, referendum, and recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Donovan, T., & Bowler, S. (1998). An overview of direct democracy in the American states. In S. Bowler, T. Donovan, & C. Tolbert (Eds.), Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States (pp. 1-26). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
16.
Gerber, E. (1998). Interest group influence in the California initiative process. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
17.
Los Angeles Times Poll. (2002). November election exit poll. Available at www.latimes.com
18.
Los Angeles Times Poll. (2003). October special election exit poll. Available at www.latimes.com
19.
Magleby, D. (1984). Direct legislation: voting on ballot propositions in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.
PPIC Statewide Survey. (2001, January). Californians and their government series. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
21.
PPIC Statewide Survey. (2002a, August). Californians and their government series. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
22.
PPIC Statewide Survey. (2002b, October). Californians and their government series. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
23.
PPIC Statewide Survey. (2003a, August). Californians and their government series. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
24.
PPIC Statewide Survey. (2003b, September). Californians and their government series. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
25.
PPIC Statewide Survey. (2003c February). Californians and their government series. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
26.
PPIC Statewide Survey. (2003d, June). Special survey on the California state budget. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
27.
PPIC Statewide Survey. (2003e, July). Special survey on the environment. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
28.
PPIC Statewide Survey. (2003f, October). Special survey on political campaigns. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
29.
Schmidt, D. (1989). Citizen lawmakers: the ballot initiative revolution. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
30.
Schrag, P. (1998). Paradise lost: California’s experience, America’s future. New York: New Press.
31.
Silva, F. (2000). The California initiative process: Background material. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
32.
Wolfinger, R., & Rosenstone, S. (1980). Who votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
