Most of the studies of voter behavior have dealt with voter turnout, but few have looked at other aspects of voting behavior that could be linked to balloting method. A reasonable amount of information has now accumulated about the impact of the shift from polling place elections to voting by mail on turnout, rolloff, drop-off, differences in voting for partisan offices and referenda, and differences in straight-ticket voting. This article analyzes recent time series of voting data in Oregon to assess the impact of the shift in voting method on these issues. The analysis includes data at the state, county, precinct, and individual levels, including individual ballots. The results suggest new criteria for evaluating shifts from one voting method to another that may be applied to other electoral reforms, such as those that will result from the Help America Vote Act.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achen, C. H. (2000). The Thomsen estimator for ecological inference. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.
2.
Alvarez, R. M. (2002, February). Ballot design options. Paper prepared for the Workshop on Human Factors Research on Voting Machines and Ballot Designs: An Exploratory Study, University of Maryland, College Park.
3.
Aspin, L., Hall, W. K., & Bax, J. (2000). Thirty years of judicial retention elections: An update. The Social Science Journal, 37, 1-17.
4.
Beck, P. A., Baum, L., Clausen, A. R., & Smith, C. E., Jr. (1992). Patterns and sources of ticket splitting in subpresidential voting. American Political Science Review, 86, 916-928.
5.
Berinsky, A. J., Burns, N., & Traugott, M. W. (2001). Who votes by mail? A dynamic model of the individual-level consequences of voting-by-mail systems. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 178-197.
6.
Bullock, C. S., III, & Dunn, R. E. (1996). Election roll-off: A test of three explanations. Urban Affairs Review, 32, 71-86.
7.
California Institute of Technology/Massachusetts Institute of Technology Voting Technology Project. (2001). Voting: What is, what could be. Pasadena, CA/Cambridge, MA: Authors.
8.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
9.
Goodman, L. (1953). Ecological regression and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 18, 663-664.
10.
Goodman, L. (1959). Some alternatives to ecological correlation. American Journal of Sociology, 64, 610-625.
11.
Hall, W. K., & Aspin, L. T. (1987). The roll-off effect in judicial retention elections. The Social Science Journal, 24, 415-428.
12.
Karp, J. A., & Banducci, S. A. (2000). Going postal: How all-mail elections influence turnout. Political Behavior, 22, 223-239.
13.
King, G. (1997). A solution to the ecological inference problem: Reconstructing individual behavior from aggregate data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Kelley, S., Jr., Ayres, R. E., & Bowen, W. G. (1967). Registration and voting: Putting first things first. American Political Science Review, 61, 359-379.
15.
Magleby, D. B. (1987). Participation in mail ballot elections. Western Political Quarterly, 40, 79-91.
16.
Mather, G. B. (1964). Effects of the use of voting machines on total votes cast: Iowa: 1920-1960. Ames, IA: Institute of Public Affairs.
17.
Mueller, J. E. (1969). Voting on the propositions: Ballot patterns and historical trends in California. American Political Science Review, 63, 1197-1212.
18.
Nichols, S. M., & Strizek, G. A. (1995). Electronic voting machines and ballot roll-off. American Politics Quarterly, 23, 300-318.
19.
Oliver, J. E. (1996). Effects of eligibility restrictions and party activity on absentee voting and overall turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 498-513.
20.
Park, W.-H. (2001). Ecological inference in a heterogeneous society: Voter transitions in Korean presidential elections 1992-1997. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
21.
Richardson, L. E., & Neely, G. W. (1996). Implementation of early voting. Spectrum, 69, 16-23.
22.
Rusk, J. G. (1970). The effects of the Australian ballot reform on split ticket voting: 1876-1908. American Political Science Review, 64, 1220-1238.
23.
Southwell, P. L., & Burchett, J. I. (2000a). Does changing the rules change the players? The effect of all-mail elections on the composition of the electorate. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 837-845.
24.
Southwell, P. L., & Burchett, J. I. (2000b). The effect of all-mail elections on voter turnout. American Politics Quarterly, 28, 72-79.
25.
Stein, R. M. (1998). Early voting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 57-69.
26.
Stein, R. M., & Garcia-Monet, P. A. (1997). Voting early, but not often. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 657-671.
27.
Thomsen, S. R. (1987). Danish elections 1920-79: A logit approach to ecological analysis and inference. Aarhus, Denmark: Politica.
28.
Thomsen, S. R. (2000). Issue voting and ecological inference. Unpublished manuscript, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
29.
Thomsen, S. R., Berglund, S., & Worlund, I. (1991). Assessing the validity of the logit method for ecological inference. European Journal of Political Research, 19, 441-477.
30.
Traugott, M. W. (2002, February). Testing alternative hardware and ballot forms. Paper prepared for the Workshop on Human Factors Research on Voting Machines and Ballot Designs: An Exploratory Study, University of Maryland, College Park.
31.
Traugott, M. W. (in press). Why electoral reform has failed: If you build it, will they come? In A. Crigler, E. McCafferty, & M. Just (Eds.), Rethinking the vote: The politics and prospects of American election reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Walker, J. L. (1966). Ballot forms and voter fatigue: An analysis of the office block and party column ballots. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 10, 448-463.
33.
White, J. P. (1960). Voting machines and the 1958 defeat of constitutional revision in Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute of Public Administration.
