The article provides evidence for a strong relationship between higher democratization and lower objective corruption levels in American state political systems. It also demonstrates that specific components of democratization thought to enhance transparency in government and probity among public officials are good predictors of lower corruption levels, whereas explicit state laws intended to reduce corruption are not.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bibby, J. F., & Holbrook, T. M. (1999). Parties and elections. In V. Gray, R. L. Hanson, & H. Jacob (Eds.), Politics in the American states (7th ed., pp. 66-112). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
2.
Bollen, K. A. (1980). Issues in the comparative measurement of political democracy. American Sociological Review, 45(2), 370-390.
3.
Bollen, K. A. (1991). Political democracy: Conceptual and measurement traps. In A. Inkeles (Ed.), On measuring democracy (pp. 3-20). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
4.
Coppedge, M. (2002). Democracy and dimensions: Comments on Munck and Verkuilen. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 35-39.
5.
Coppedge, M., & Reinicke, W. H. (1991). Measuring polyarchy. In A. Inkeles (Ed.), On measuring democracy (pp. 47-68). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
6.
Council of State Governments. (1984). Campaign finance, ethics, and lobby law blue book, 1984-85. Lexington, KY: Author.
7.
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
de Leon, P. (1993). Thinking about political corruption. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
9.
della Porta, D., & Vannucci, A. (1999). Corrupt exchanges. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
10.
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
11.
Dobel, J. P. (1999). Public integrity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
12.
Elazar, D. (1984). American federalism (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
13.
Elazar, D. (1994). The American mosaic. Boulder, CO: Westview.
14.
Elkins, Z. (2000). Gradations of democracy? Empirical tests of alternative conceptualizations. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 287-294.
15.
Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. C. (1993). Statehouse democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Gill, J. (2001). Whose variance is it anyway?: Interpreting empirical models with state-level data. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 1(3), 318-338.
17.
Gleditsch, K. S., & Ward, M. D. (1997). Double take: A reexamination of democracy and autocracy in modern polities. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(2), 361-383.
18.
Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (1998). Corruption and government size: A disaggregated analysis. Public Choice, 97(3), 107-120.
19.
Goldsmith, A. A. (1999). Slapping the grasping hand: Correlates of political corruption in emerging markets. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(4), 865-883.
20.
Heidenheimer, A. J., & Moroff, H. (2002). Controlling business payoffs to foreign officials: The 1998 OECD anti-bribery convention. In A. J. Heidenheimer & M. Johnston (Eds.), Political corruption (pp. 943-960). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
21.
Hill, K. Q. (1994). Democracy in the fifty states. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
22.
Holbrook, T. M., & Van Dunk, E. (1993). Electoral competition in the American states. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 955-962.
23.
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
25.
Johnston, M. (1983). Corruption and political culture in America: An empirical perspective. Publius, 13(1), 19-39.
26.
Johnston, M. (2002a). Measuring the new corruption rankings: Implications for analysis and reform. In A. J. Heidenheimer & M. Johnston (Eds.), Political corruption (3rd ed., pp. 865-884). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
27.
Johnston, M. (2002b). Party systems, competition, and political checks against corruption. In A. J. Heidenheimer & M. Johnston (Eds.), Political corruption (3rd ed., pp. 777-796). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
28.
Key, V. O. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation. New York: Knopf.
29.
King, J. D. (1989). Interparty competition in the American states: An examination of index components. Western Political Quarterly, 42(1), 83-92.
30.
Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
Klitgaard, R. (1991). Adjusting to reality. San Francisco: ICS Press.
32.
Lambsdorf, J. G. (2000). The precision and regional comparison of perceived levels of corruption—Interpreting the results. Retrieved April 7, 2002, from http://www.gwdg.de/~uwvw/
33.
Mair, P. (1996). Party systems and structures of competition. In L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi, & P. Norris (Eds.), Comparing Democracies (pp. 83-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Marshall, M. G., Gurr, T. R., Davenport, C., & Jaggers, K. (2002). POLITY IV, 1800-1999: Comments on Munck and Verkuilen. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 40-45.
35.
Mayhew, D. (1986). Placing parties in American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
Meier, K. J., & Holbrook, T. M. (1992). “I seen my opportunities and I took 'em”: Political corruption in the American states. Journal of Politics, 54(1), 135-155.
37.
Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Generating better data: A response to discussants. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 52-57.
38.
Nice, D. C. (1983). Political corruption in the American states. American Politics Quarterly, 11(4), 507-517.
39.
O'Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. In G. O'Donnell, P. C. Schmitter, & L. Whitehead (Eds.), Transitions from authoritarian rule (pp. 3-73). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1999). Public sector corruption. Paris: Author.
41.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2000). Trust in government. Paris: Author.
42.
Paldam, M. (2002). The cross-country pattern of corruption: Economics, culture, and the seesaw dynamics. European Journal of Political Economy, 18(2), 215-240.
43.
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Ranney, A. (1976). Parties in state politics. In H. Jacob & K. N. Vines (Eds.), Politics in the American states, (pp. 51-92). Boston: Little, Brown.
45.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978). Corruption. New York: Academic Press.
46.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Sandholtz, W. & Koetzle, W. (2000). Accounting for corruption: Economic structure, democracy, and trade. International Studies Quarterly, 44(1), 31-50.
48.
Schlesinger, T. J., & Meier, K. J. (2002). Variations in corruption among the American states. In A. J. Heidenheimer & M. Johnston (Eds.), Political corruption (3rd ed., pp. 627-644). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
49.
Sharkansky, I. (1969). The utility of Elazar's political culture. Polity, 2(1), 66-83.
50.
Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(2), 399-457.
51.
Tucker, H. (1982). Inter-party competition in the American states: One more time. American Politics Quarterly, 10(1), 93-116.
52.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1981). Statistical abstract of the U.S., 1981. Washington, DC: Author.
53.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1983). Statistical abstract of the U.S., 1984. Washington, DC: Author.
54.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1986). Statistical abstract of the U.S., 1987. Washington, DC: Author.
55.
Vanhanen, T. (2000). A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810-1998. Journal of Peace Research, 37(1), 251-265.
