The relationship between political events and aggregate opinion change is complicated, and the influence of actual events, as opposed to domestic political elites' responses to those events, has seldom been analyzed. This article attempts to untangle these relationships with data examining events and statements of the political leaders (belligerence) of both the United States and the Soviet Union during the cold war. Considering the salience of the Soviet Union for domestic politics, there is reason to suspect that the public should have responded directly to Soviet actions and statements, while also reacting to U.S. belligerence. The analysis indicates that the public reacted only to changes in U.S., not Soviet, belligerence. The implications of this finding for public preferences on foreign and defense policy, and for opinion more generally, are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, J. L., & Newmark, A. J. (2002). A dynamic model of U.S. senator approval, 1981-2000. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 3(2), 298-316.
2.
Austin, A. (1979, December 31). USSR says it has sent “limited military contingent” to Afghanistan to help repel aggression from abroad. New York Times, p. A1.
3.
Bartels, L. M. (1994). The American public's defense spending preferences in the post-cold war era. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 479-508.
4.
Blanton, T. (2002). When did the cold war end? Cold War International History Project Bulletin, Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars, Washington, DC.
5.
Brody, R. A. (1991). Assessing the president: The media, elite opinion and public support. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
Carmines, E., & Stimson, J. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: Free Press.
8.
Durr, R. H., Gilmour, J. B., & Wolbrecht, C. (1997). Explaining congressional approval. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 175-207.
9.
Freeman, J. R. (1983). Granger causality and the time series analysis of political relationships. American Journal of Political Science, 27, 325-355.
10.
Goldstein, J. S., & Freeman, J. R. (1990). Three way street. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regression in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111-120.
12.
Greene, W. (2000). Econometric analysis. New York: Praeger.
13.
Hartley, T., & Russett, B. (1992). Public opinion and the common defense: Who governs military spending in the United States? American Political Science Review, 86(4), 905-915.
14.
Hirshberg, M. (1993). Perpetuating patriotic perceptions: The cognitive function of the cold war. Westport, CT: Praeger.
15.
Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1989). How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. American Political Science Review, 81, 1099-1120.
16.
Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1990). Public images of the Soviet Union: The impact of foreign policy attitudes. Journal of Politics, 52, 3-28.
17.
Mackuen, M. B., Erikson, R. S., & Stimson, J. A. (2001). The macro polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Mackuen, M. B., Erikson, R. S., & Stimson, J. A. (1992). Peasants or bankers: The American electorate and the U.S. economy. American Political Science Review, 89, 597-611.
19.
Mueller, J. E. (1979). Public expectations of war during the cold war. American Journal of Political Science, 23, 301-328.
20.
Ostrom, C. W., Jr., & Smith, R. (1992). Error correction, attitude persistence and rewards and punishments. Political Analysis, 4, 127-181.
21.
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77, 175-190.
22.
Page, B. I. & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans' policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Peffley, M., & Hurwitz, J. (1992). International events and foreign policy beliefs: Public response to changing Soviet-U.S. relations. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 431-461.
24.
Smith, T. (1979, December 30). President Carter, in toughest diplomatic exchange of his presidency, warns Soviet Union to withdraw its forces or face serious consequences in its relations with U.S. New York Times, p. A1.
25.
Stimson, J. A. (1999). Public opinion in America: Moods, cycles and swings. Boulder, CO: Westview.
26.
U.S. Department of Defense. (2000). National defense budget estimates for fiscal year 2000 (Green Book). Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
27.
Vincent, J. E. (1979). Project theory: Interpretations and policy relevance. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
28.
Vincent, J. E. (1983). WEIS vs. COPDAB: Correspondence problems. International Studies Quarterly, 27, 161-168.
29.
Wlezien, C. (1996). Dynamics of representation: The case of U.S. spending on defence. British Journal of Political Science, 26, 81-103.
30.
Wlezien, C. (1995). The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 981-1000.
31.
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
