This study, which uses a national survey conducted by Hibbing and Theiss-Morse, finds that evaluations of the membership of Congress and of one’s own representative in the U.S. House are both tied closely to issues of procedural justice and, in particular, to the perceived fairness of Congress and to the perceived responsiveness of the legislative branch to the citizenry. The extent to which a citizen desires parochial legislative behavior is of little consequence for evaluating the legislative branch, or even one’s own representative.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnold, R. D. (1990). The logic of congressional action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
Asher, H., & Barr, M. (1994). Popular support for Congress and its members. In T. E. Mann & N. J. Ornstein (Eds.), Congress, the press and the public (pp. 15-43). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and Brookings Institution.
3.
Born, R. (1990). The shared fortunes of Congress and congressmen: Members may run from Congress but they cannot hide. Journal of Politics, 52(4), 1223-1241.
4.
Cook, T. E. (1989). Making law and making news. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
5.
Craig, S. C. (1993). The malevolent leaders. Boulder, CO: Westview.
6.
Craig, S. C. (1996). The angry voter: Politics and popular discontent in the 1990s. In S. C. Craig(Ed.), Broken contract? Changing relationships between Americans and their government. Boulder, CO: Westview.
7.
Durr, R. H., Gilmour, J. B.Wolbrecht, C. (1997). Explaining congressional approval. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 175-207.
8.
Easton, D., & Dennis, J. (1969). Children in the political system: Origins of political legitimacy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Farnsworth, S. J. (2001). Patterns of political support: Examining Congress and the presidency. Congress & the Presidency, 28(1), 45-61.
10.
Fenno, R. F., Jr. (1975). If, as Ralph Nader says, Congress is “the broken branch,” how come we love our congressmen so much? In N. J. Ornstein (Ed.), Congress and change: Evolution and reform (pp. 277-287). New York: Praeger.
11.
Fenno, R. F., Jr. (1992). When incumbency fails: The Senate career of Mark Andrews. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
12.
Fiorina, M. P. (1992). Divided government. New York: Macmillan.
13.
Glad, B. (1995). How George Bush lost the presidential election of 1992. In S. A. Renshon (Ed.), The Clinton presidency: Campaigning, governing and the psychology of leadership (pp. 11-35). Boulder, CO: Westview.
14.
Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (1995). Congress as public enemy: Public attitudes toward American political institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (1998). The media’s role in public negativity towards Congress: Distinguishing emotional reactions from cognitive evaluations. American Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 475-498.
16.
Jacobson, G. C. (1997). The politics of congressional elections (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
17.
Jones, C. O. (1994). The presidency in a separated system. Washington, DC: Brookings.
18.
Kimball, D. C., & Patterson, S. C. (1997). Living up to expectations: Public attitudes towards Congress. Journal of Politics, 59(3), 701-728.
19.
Lichter, S. R., & Amundson, D. R. (1994). Less news is worse news: Television news coverage of Congress: 1972-92. In T. E. Mann & N. J. Ornstein (Eds.), Congress, the press and the public(pp. 131-140). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and Brookings Institution.
20.
Lind, E. A., Tyler, T. R.Huo, Y. J. (1997). Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 767-780.
21.
Mayhew, D. (1991). Divided we govern: Party control, lawmaking and investigations 1946-1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Neustadt, R. E. (1990). Presidential power and the modern presidents. New York: Free Press.
24.
Parker, G. R., & Davidson, R. (1979). Why do Americans love their congressmen so much more than their Congress? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4, 52-61.
25.
Robinson, M. J. (1981). The three faces of congressional media. In T. E. Mann & N. J. Ornstein(Eds.), The new Congress (pp. 55-96). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
26.
Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
27.
Skocpol, T. (1997). Boomerang: Health care reform and the turn against government. New York: Norton.
28.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
29.
Tolchin, S. J. (1999). The angry American: How voter rage is changing the nation (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.
30.
Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice? Law & Society Review, 22(1), 103-135.
31.
Tyler, T. R., & Rasinski, K. (1991). Procedural justice, institutional legitimacy and the acceptance of unpopular U.S. Supreme Court decisions: A reply to Gibson. Law & Society Review, 25(3), 621-630.
32.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L.Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
