Adkins, R. E.
(2000, April). Progressive ambition and the presidency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
2.
Adkins, R. E.
, & Dowdle, A. J. (2000). Break out the mint juleps? Is New Hampshire the “primary” culprit limiting presidential nomination forecasting?American Politics Quarterly, 28, 251-269.
3.
Adkins, R. E.
, & Dowdle, A. J. (in press). How important are Iowa and New Hampshire to winning post-reform presidential nominations?Political Research Quarterly.
4.
Barilleaux, R. J.
, & Adkins, R. E. (1993). The nomination: Process and patterns. In M. Nelson (Ed.), The elections of 1992 (pp. 21-56). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
5.
Mayer, W.
(1996). Forecasting presidential nominations. In W. Mayer (Ed.), In pursuit of the White House: How we choose our presidential nominees (pp. 44-71). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
6.
Steger, W.P.
(2000). Do primary voters draw from a stacked deck? Presidential nominations in an era of candidate-centered campaigns. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 30, 727-753.
