Liberal absentee laws are designed to make voting easier, which should stimulate turnout. Using data from the National Election Studies, we test the hypothesis that persons who choose to vote early are already highly motivated to participate in the political process. We find support for this hypothesis, which raises questions about the extent to which liberal absentee laws can expand the electorate. Furthermore, contrary to past research, we see the Republican advantage in absentee voting as a result of self-selection rather than party mobilization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brians, C. L.
& Grofman, B. (1999). When registration barriers fall, who votes? An empirical test of the rational choice model. Public Choice, 99, 161-176.
2.
California Secretary of State
. (1996). Election statistics [Online]. Available: http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/elections_u.htm
3.
Calvert, J.
, & Gilchrist, J. (1993). Suppose they held an election and almost everybody came! PS: Political Science & Politics, 24, 695-700.
Converse, P. E.
(1962). Information flow and the stability of partisan attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 578-599.
6.
Cook, G.
(1991). Mail-order voters tip the balance in close elections. California Journal, 22, 101-103.
7.
Downs, A.
(1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
8.
Dubin, J. A.
, & Kalsow, G. A. (1996). Comparing absentee and precinct voters: A view over time. Political Behavior, 18, 369-411.
9.
Finkel, S. E.
(1993). Reexamining the “minimal effects” model in recent presidential campaigns. Journal of Politics, 55, 1-21.
10.
Green, W. H.
(1997). Econometric analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
11.
Jeffe, D.
, & Jeffe, S. B. (1990, November/December). Absence counts: Voting by mail. The American Enterprise, pp. 19-21.
12.
Karp, J. A.
, & Banducci, S. A. (2000). Going postal: How all mail elections influence turnout. Political Behavior, 22(3), 223-239.
13.
Miller, W. E., Kinder, D. R., Rosenstone, S. J., & the National Election Studies. (1992). American National Election Study, 1990: Post-election survey [Computer file]. Conducted by the University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies. 2nd ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].
14.
Miller, W. E., Kinder, D. R., Rosenstone, S. J., & the National Election Studies. (1993). American National Election Study, 1992: Pre-and post-election survey (enhanced with 1990 and 1991 data) [Computer file]. Conducted by the University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies, and Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [producers], 1993. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
15.
Mitchell, G. E.
, & Wlezien, C. (1995). The impact of legal constraints on voter registration, turnout, and the composition of the American electorate. Political Behavior, 17, 179-202.
16.
Oliver, J. E.
(1996). The effects of eligibility restrictions and party activity on absentee voting and overall turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 498-513.
17.
Oregon Secretary of State
. (1996). Official election participation statistics November 5, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.sos.state.or.us/elections/nov596/other.info/totbycty.htm
18.
Patterson, S. C.
, & Caldeira, G. A. (1985). Mailing in the vote: Correlates and consequences of absentee voting. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 766-787.
19.
Piven, F. F.
, & Cloward, R. A. (1988). Why Americans don't vote. New York: Pantheon Books.
20.
Richardson, L. E.
, & Neeley, G. W. (1996). The impact of early voting on turnout: The 1994 elections in Tennessee. State and Local Government Review, 28, 173-179.
21.
Riker, W. H.
, & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62, 25-42.
22.
Rosenstone, S. J.
, & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
23.
Rosenstone, S. J.
, Kinder, D. R., Miller, W. E, & the National Election Studies. (1998). American National Election Study, 1996: Pre- and post election survey [Computer file]. 3rd release. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 1998. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
24.
Rosenstone, S. J., Miller, W. E., Kinder, D. R., & the National Election Studies. (1995). American National Election Study, 1994: Post-election survey (enhanced with 1992 and 1993 data) [Computer file]. Conducted by the University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies. 2nd ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies, and Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [producers], 1995. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
25.
Sapiro, V., Rosenstone, S. J., & the National Election Studies. (1999). National Election Studies, 1998: Post-election study [data set]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer and distributor].
26.
Stein, R. M.
(1998). Early voting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 57-69.
27.
Stein, R. M.
, & Garcia-Monet, P. A. (1997). Voting early but not often. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 657-671.
28.
Teixeira, R. A.
(1992). The disappearing American voter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
29.
Washington Secretary of State
. (1996). Election statistics [Online]. Available: http://www.wa.gov/sec/elections.htm
30.
Wolfinger, R. E.
, & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
