A New Look at Turnover in the U.S. House of Representatives,1789-1998

Abstract

Despite concern with turnover in the U.S. House of Representatives, few scholars have attempted to view turnover in historical perspective or in all its forms. Confusion over the basic facts has impeded attempts to explain and evaluate levels of turnover. We present a broad descriptive overview of turnover over the entire history of the U.S. House in terms of the levels of overall turnover, forms thereof, and patterns, particularly within party periods. The findings include that turnover has declined over the years but not in a continuous fashion and not evenly among the different forms, that general election defeat is not the primary form of turnover, that common methods of reporting turnover magnify the apparent importance of electorally based turnover, and that turnover varies systematically by party period. A research agenda is proposed for explanatory work on turnover including strategic retirement and the impact of partisan realignments on levels and forms of turnover.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramowitz, A. (1991). Incumbency, campaign spending, and the decline of competition in U.S. House elections. Journal of Politics, 53(1), 34-56.

Asher, H. , & Weisberg, H. (1978). Voting change in Congress: Some dynamic perspectives on an evolutionary process. American Journal of Political Science, 22(2), 391-425.

Capell, E. (1996). The rich get richer: Term limits and interest groups in California. Paper presented at the 1996 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.

Carmines, E. , & Stimson, J. (1989). Issue evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Chambers, W. , & Burnham, W. (Eds.). (1967). The American party systems: Stages of political development. New York: Oxford University Press.

Erikson, R. (1976). Is there such a thing as a safe seat? Polity, 8(4), 623-632.

Fenno, R. (1978). Home style. Boston: Little, Brown.

Fiorina, M. (1977). The case of the vanishing marginals: The bureaucracy did it. American Political Science Review, 71(1), 177-181.

Fiorina, M. (1996). Divided government (2nd ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.

10.

Fiorina, M. , Rohde, D. , & Wissel, P. (1975). Historical change in House turnover. In N. Ornstein (Ed.), Congress in change (pp. 24-59). New York: Praeger.

11.

Gilmour, J. , & Rothstein, P. (1996). A dynamic model of loss, retirement, and tenure in the U.S. House of Representatives. Journal of Politics, 58(1), 54-68.

12.

Hibbing, J. (1991). Congressional careers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

13.

Jacobson, G. (1987). The marginals never vanished: Incumbency and competition in elections to the U.S. House, 1952-1982. American Journal of Political Science, 31(1), 126-140.

14.

Jacobson, G. (1997). The politics of Congressional elections (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.

15.

Jacobson, G. , & Kernell, S. (1983). Strategy and choice in Congressional elections (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

16.

Kahneman, D. , Slovic, P. , & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Katz, J. , & Sala, B. (1996). Careerism, committee assignments, and the electoral connection. American Political Science Review, 90(1), 21-33.

18.

Kernell, S. (1977). Toward understanding 19th century Congressional careers: Ambition, competition, and rotation. American Journal of Political Science, 21(4), 669-693.

19.

Kiewiet, R. , & Zeng, L. (1993). An analysis of Congressional career decisions, 1947-1986. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 928-941.

20.

Mayhew, D. (1974). Congressional elections: The case of vanishing marginals. Polity, 6(3), 295-317.

21.

Moore, M. , & Hibbing, J. (1998). Situational dissatisfaction in Congress: Explaining voluntary departures. Journal of Politics, 60(4), 1088-1107.

22.

Ornstein, N. , Mann, T. , & Malbin, M. (1996). Vital statistics on Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

23.

Polsby, N. (1968). The institutionalization of the U.S. House. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 144-168.

24.

Price, H. D. (1975). Congress and the evolution of legislative professionalism. In N. Ornstein (Ed.), Congress in change (pp. 2-23). New York: Praeger.

25.

Silbey, J. (1994). The rise and fall of American parties, 1790-1993. In L. S. Maisel (Ed.), The parties respond (2nd ed., pp. 3-18). Boulder, CO: Westview.

26.

Swain, J. , Borrelli, S. , & Reed, B. (1999). Strategic retirement in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1898-1996: “You can't fire me, I quit.” Southeastern Political Review, 27(1), 3-31.

27.

Young, J. S. (1966). The Washington community, 1800-1828. New York: Columbia University Press.