Abstract
Despite a large volume of work on the defense-growth relationship in the United States, previous studies have failed to reach a consensus. Part of the explanation of the mixed results may be that various data sets and model designs have been employed. Thus, using an updated (1948-1996) and longer data set, I test several of the more prominent defense-growth models. This research design will eliminate sampling bias and increase reliability of findings. The results of this research design show that defense spending does not have a significant, direct impact on economic growth in the United States. Instead, nonmilitary government expenditures have significant, negative effects on economic growth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
