When the U.S. Supreme Court decides to exercise judicial review on a law passed by a democratically elected institution, it can have a profound and critical impact on public policy. Furthermore, recent research shows that the Court more frequently declares state statutes unconstitutional than federal statutes. However, only a limited number of studies have extensively explored this political phenomenon. One aspect of a state that has not been considered in connection with the Supreme Court’s use of judicial review over state legislation is the electoral environment in which the laws are produced. We argue that because electoral competition affects the legislative output from a state, it could also influence the likelihood that a state has a statute invalidated by the U.S. Supreme Court. When examining all states between 1971 and 2010, we find evidence in support of our theoretical expectation. Specifically, we find that an increase in electoral competition corresponds to an increased likelihood that a state has a statute invalidated by the Supreme Court. This finding contributes to our understanding of the Supreme Court’s use of judicial review, and it also suggests that electoral pressure can incentivize states to craft unconstitutional public policy.
AldrichJohn H.1995. Why Parties?: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AltJames E.LowryRobert C.1994. “Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States.” American Political Science Review88 (4): 811–28.
3.
AnsolabehereStephenSnyderJames M.Jr.2002. “The Incumbency Advantage in US Elections: An Analysis of State and Federal Offices, 1942–2000.” Election Law Journal1 (3): 315–338.
ArnoldR. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
6.
BagashkaTanyaClarkJennifer Hayes. 2016. “Electoral Rules and Legislative Particularism: Evidence from U.S. State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review110 (3): 441–56.
7.
BaileyMichael A.MaltzmanForrest. 2011. The Constrained Court: Law, Politics, and the Decisions Justices Make. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8.
Baker v. Carr. 1962. 369 U.S. 186.
9.
BarrilleauxCharlesBracePaul. 2007. “Notes from the Laboratories of Democracy: State Government Enactments of Market-and State-Based Health Insurance Reforms in the 1990s.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law32 (4): 655–83.
10.
BarrilleauxCharlesHolbrookThomasLangerLaura. 2002. “Electoral Competition, Legislative Balance, and American State Welfare Policy.” American Journal of Political Science46 (2): 415–27.
11.
BaumLawrence. 2013. The Supreme Court. 11th ed.Los Angeles: CQ Press.
12.
BeneshSara C.2003. “Harold J. Spaeth: The Supreme Court Computer.” In The Pioneers of Judicial Behavior, ed. MaveetyNancy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 116–47.
13.
BeneshSara C.MartinekWendy L.2002. “State Supreme Court Decision Making in Confession Cases.” Justice System Journal23 (1): 109–33.
14.
BerryFrances StokesBerryWilliam D.1999. “Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research.” In Theories of the Policy Process, ed. SabatierPaul A.Boulder: Westview Press, 263–308.
15.
BerryWilliam D.FordingRichard C.RingquistEvan J.HansonRussell L.KlarnerCarl. 2010. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States: A Re-appraisal.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly10 (2): 117–35.
16.
BesleyTimothyPerssonTorstenSturmDaniel M.2010. “Political Competition, Policy and Growth: Theory and Evidence from the US.” The Review of Economic Studies77 (4): 1329–52.
17.
BickelAlexander. 1961. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
18.
BirkheadNathaniel A.2015. “The Role of Ideology in State Legislative Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly40 (1): 55–82.
BonneauChris W.CannDamon M.2011. “Campaign Spending, Diminishing Marginal Returns, and Campaign Finance Restrictions in Judicial Elections.” The Journal of Politics73 (4): 1267–80.
21.
BonneauChris W.HallMelinda Gann. 2009. In Defense of Judicial Elections. Abingdon: Routledge.
22.
BousheyGraeme. 2010. Policy Diffusion Dynamics in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
BracePaul R.HallMelinda Gann. 1990. “Neo-institutionalism and Dissent in State Supreme Courts.” The Journal of Politics52 (1): 54–70.
24.
BracePaul R.HallMelinda Gann. 1997. “The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice.” The Journal of Politics59 (4): 1206–31.
BrennanWilliam J.Jr.1977. “State Constitutions and the Protection of Individual Rights.” Harvard Law Review90 (3): 489–504.
27.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. 1954. 347 U.S. 483.
28.
CannDamon M.WilhelmTeena. 2011. “Case Visibility and the Electoral Connection in State Supreme Courts.” American Politics Research39 (3): 557–81.
29.
CasperJonathan D.1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policy Making.” American Political Science Review70:50–63.
30.
ClucasRichard A.2001. “Principal-Agent Theory and The Power of State House Speakers.” Legislative Studies Quarterly26 (2): 319–338.
31.
Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Nyquist. 1973. 413 U.S. 756.
32.
Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. 2012. “The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation, Centennial Edition.” S. Doc. 112-9. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CONAN-2012.
33.
ConlanTimothy. 2010. From New Federalism to Devolution: Twenty-Five Years of Intergovernmental Reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
34.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMathew D.2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
DahlRobert A.1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law6:279–95.
36.
DahlRobert A.1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
37.
DoanAlesha. 2009. Opposition and Intimidation: The Abortion Wars and Strategies of Political Harassment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
38.
DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
39.
EpsteinLeeKnightJack. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
40.
EpsteinLeeMartinAndrew D.SegalJeffrey A.WesterlandChad. 2007. “The Judicial Common Space.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization23 (2): 303–25.
41.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.1997. “Voters, Candidates and Issues in Congressional Elections.” In Congress Reconsidered, 6th ed., eds. LawrenceC.OppenheimerBruce I.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 132–61.
42.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
FarrellWilliam E.1972. “Legislators Firm on Parochial Aid.” New York Times, 48.
44.
FennoRichard F.1978. Home Style: House Members in Their District. Boston: Little, Brown.
45.
GammGeraldKousserThad. 2010. “Broad Bills or Particularistic Policy? Historical Patterns in American State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review104 (1): 151–70.
46.
GatesJohn. 1987. “Partisan Realignment, Unconstitutional State Policies, and the U.S. Supreme Court, 1837–1964.” American Journal of Political Science31 (2): 259–80.
47.
GelmanAndrew. 2009. Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.1998. “The Politics of Social Regulatory Policy: State and Federal Hate Crime Policy and Implementation Effort.” Political Research Quarterly51 (1): 69–88.
50.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.MeierKenneth J.1996. “The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict.” The Journal of Politics58 (2): 352–69.
51.
HallMatthew E.BlackRyan C.2013. “Keeping the Outliers in Line? Judicial Review of State Laws by the U.S. Supreme Court.” Social Science Quarterly94 (2): 395–409.
52.
HallMelinda Gann. 1987. “Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study.” The Journal of Politics49 (4): 1117–24.
53.
HansfordThomas G.SpriggsJames F.2006. The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
54.
HicksWilliam D.2015. “Partisan Competition and the Efficiency of Lawmaking in American State Legislatures, 1991–2009.” American Politics Research43:743–70.
55.
HinchliffeKelsey L.LeeFrances E.2016. “Party Competition and Conflict in State Legislatures.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly16 (2): 172–97.
56.
HoganRobert E.2008. “Policy Responsiveness and Incumbent Reelection in State Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science52:858–73.
57.
HolbrookThomas M.Van DunkEmily. 1993. “Electoral Competition in the American States.” American Political Science Review87 (4): 955–62.
58.
JenningsEdwards. 1979. “Competition, Constituencies, and Welfare Policies in American States.” American Political Science Review73:414–29.
59.
JonesPhilip E.2013. “The Effect of Political Competition on Democratic Accountability.” Political Behavior35:481–515.
KastellecJonathan P.2011. “Hierarchical and Collegial Politics on the US Courts of Appeals.” The Journal of Politics73 (2): 345–361.
62.
KeyValdimer O.1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
63.
KingJames D.2000. “Changes in Professionalism in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly25:327–43.
64.
KlarnerCarl. 2003. “The Measurement of the Partisan Balance of State Government.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly3 (3): 309–19.
65.
KousserThad. 2005. Term Limits and the Dismantling of State Legislative Professionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
LaxJeffrey R.PhillipsJustin H.2012. “The Democratic Deficit in the States.” American Journal of Political Science56 (1): 148–66.
67.
LewisDaniel C.SchneiderSaundra K.JacobyWilliam G.2015. “Institutional Characteristics and State Policy Priorities: The Impact of Legislatures and Governors.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly15 (4): 447–75.
68.
LindquistStefanie A.CorleyPamela C.2011. “The Multi-staged Process of Judicial Review: Facial and As-applied Constitutional Challenges to Legislation before the Supreme Court.” Journal of Legal Studies40 (2): 467–502.
69.
LindquistStefanie A.CorleyPamela C.2013. “National Policy Preferences and Judicial Review of State Statutes.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism43 (2): 151–78.
70.
LindquistStefanie A.SolbergRorie Spill. 2007. “Judicial Review by the Burger and Rehnquist Courts: Explaining Justices’ Responses to Constitutional Challenges.” Political Research Quarterly60 (1): 71–90.
71.
MaestasCherie. 2000. “Professional Legislatures and Ambitious Politicians: Policy Responsiveness of State Institutions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly25 (4): 663–90.
72.
MaestasCherie. 2003. “The Incentive to Listen: Progressive Ambition, Resources, and Opinion Monitoring among State Legislators.” The Journal of Politics65 (2): 439–56.
73.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
74.
MenendezAlbert J.1996. Evangelicals at the Ballot Box. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
75.
MillerSusan M.2013. “Administering Representation: The Role of Elected Administrators in Translating Citizens’ Preferences into Public Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory23:865–97.
76.
MillerSusan M.RingsmuthEve M.LittleJoshua M.2015. “Pushing Constitutional Limits in the U.S. States Legislative Professionalism and Judicial Review of State Laws by the U.S. Supreme Court.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly15 (4): 476–91.
77.
MooneyChristopher Z.LeeMei-Hsien. 1995. “Legislative Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform.” American Journal of Political Science39:599–627.
78.
New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann. 1932, 285 U.S. 262.
PollockStewart G.1984. “Adequate and Independent State Grounds as a Means of Balancing the Relationship between State and Federal Courts.” Texas Law Review63:977.
85.
PooleKeith T.1998. “Estimating a Basic Space from a Set of Issue Scales.” American Journal of Political Science42:954–93.
86.
RanneyAustin. 1976. “Parties in State Politics.” In Politics in the American States, eds. Herbert Jacob and Kenneth Vines. Boston: Little, Brown, 61–99.
87.
RichmanJesse. 2010. “The Logic of Legislative Leadership: Preferences, Challenges, and the Speaker’s Powers.” Legislative Studies Quarterly35 (2): 211–33.
88.
Roe v. Wade. 1973. 410 U.S. 113.
89.
RogersSteven. 2015. “Strategic Challenger Entry in a Federal System: The Role of Economic and Political Conditions in State Legislative Competition.” Legislative Studies Quarterly40(4): 539–570.
90.
RostowEugene V.1952. “The Democratic Character of Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review66:193–224.
91.
SaenzThomas A.2011. “New Nullification: Arizona’s SB 1070 Triggers a National Constitutional Crisis.” Berkeley La Raza Law Journal21:5–16.
92.
SchattschneiderElmer E.1960. The Semi-sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
93.
SegalJeffrey A.SpaethHarold J.2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
94.
ShufeldtGregoryFlavinPatrick. 2012. “Two Distinct Concepts: Party Competition in Government and Electoral Competition in the American States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly12:330–42.
95.
SoraufFrank Joseph. 2015. The Wall of Separation: The Constitutional Politics of Church and State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
96.
SquirePeverill. 2007. “Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly7 (2): 211–27.
97.
SquirePeverillWolfingerRaymond E.GlassDavid P.1987. “Residential Mobility and Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review81 (1): 45–65.
98.
StuckyThomas D.HeimerKarenLangJoseph B.2005. “Partisan Politics, Electoral Competition and Imprisonment: An Analysis of States over Time.” Criminology43 (1): 211–48.
99.
TamanahaBrian Z.2009. Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
100.
Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists. 1986. 476 U.S. 747.
101.
WeinerDanielVandewalkerIan. 2015. Stronger Parties, Stronger Democracy: Rethinking Reform. New York: Brennan Center for Justice, New York University School of Law.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
