Does direct democracy strengthen popular control of public policy in the United States? A major challenge in evaluating policy representation is the measurement of state-level public opinion and public policy. Although recent studies of policy responsiveness and congruence have provided improved measures of public opinion using multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) techniques, these analyses are limited by their static nature and cross-sectional design. Issue attitudes, unlike more general political orientations, often vary considerably over time. Unless the dynamics of issue-specific public opinion are appropriately incorporated into the analyses, tests of policy responsiveness and congruence may be misleading. Thus, we assess the degree of policy representation in direct democracy states regarding same-sex relationship recognition policies using dynamic models of policy adoption and congruence that employ dynamic MRP estimates of attitudes toward same-sex marriage. We find that direct democracy institutions increase both policy responsiveness and congruence with issue-specific public opinion.
AchenChristopher H.1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science22 (3): 475–510.
2.
ArceneauxKevin. 2002. “Direct Democracy and the Link between Public Opinion and State Abortion Policy.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly2 (4): 372–87.
3.
BerryFrances StokesBerryWilliam D.1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review84 (2): 395–415.
4.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93.” American Journal of Political Science42 (1): 327–48.
5.
BishinBenjamin G.HayesThomas J.IncantalupoMatthew B.SmithCharles Anthony. 2015. “Opinion Backlash and Public Attitudes: Are Political Advances in Gay Rights Counterproductive?” American Journal of Political Science60 (3): 625–48.
6.
BowlerShaunDonovanTodd. 2004. “Measuring the Effects of Direct Democracy on State Policy: Not All Initiatives are Created Equal.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly4 (3): 345–63.
7.
Box-SteffensmeierJanet M.JonesBradford S.2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BrewerPaul R.WilcoxClyde. 2005. “Trends: Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions.” The Public Opinion Quarterly69 (4): 599–616.
9.
BurdenBarry C.2005. “Institutions and Policy Representation in the States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly5 (4): 373–93.
10.
ButticeMatthew K.HightonBenjamin. 2013. “How Does Multilevel Regression and Poststratification Perform with Conventional National Surveys?” Political Analysis21 (4): 449–67.
11.
CamobrecoJohn F.1998. “Preferences, Fiscal Policies, and the Initiative Process.” The Journal of Politics60 (3): 819–29.
12.
DownsAnthony. 1972. “Up and Down with Ecology—The ‘Issue-Attention Cycle.’” Public Interest28:38–50.
13.
EdelmanMurray J.1971. Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence. Chicago: Markham Publishing.
14.
EnnsPeter K.KochJulianna. 2013. “Public Opinion in the U.S. States: 1956 to 2010.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly13 (3): 349–72.
15.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.2006. “Public Opinion in the States: A Quarter Century of Change and Stability.” In Public Opinion in the States, edited by CohenJeffrey E., 229-253. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
17.
FejesFred. 2008. Gay Rights and Moral Panic: The Origins of America’s Debate on Homosexuality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
FloresAndrew R.2014. National Trends in Public Opinion on LGBT Rights in the United States. Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute.
GerberElisabeth R.1996. “Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science40 (1): 99–128.
21.
GerberElisabeth R.1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
22.
GolderMattStramskiJacek. 2010. “Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science54 (1): 90–106.
23.
GrayVirginiaLoweryDavidFellowesMatthewMcAteeAndrea. 2004. “Public Opinion, Public Policy, and Organized Interests in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly57 (3): 411–20.
24.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.2001. “Policy Diffusion as a Geographic Expansion of the Scope of Political Conflict: Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the 1990s.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly1 (1): 2–26.
25.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.QuerzeAlanaLindamanKara. 2007. “Lose, Win, or Draw? A Reexamination of Direct Democracy and Minority Rights.” Political Research Quarterly60 (2): 304–14.
26.
HaskellJohn. 2001. Direct Democracy or Representative Government? Dispelling the Populist Myth. Boulder: Westview Press.
27.
HillKim QuaileHinton-AndersonAngela. 1995. “Pathways of Representation: A Causal Analysis of Public Opinion-Policy Linkages.” American Journal of Political Science39 (4): 924–35.
28.
JacobyWilliam G.SchneiderSaundra K.2009. “A New Measure of Policy Spending Priorities in the American States.” Political Analysis17 (1): 1–24.
29.
KastellecJonathanLaxJeffrey R.PhillipsJustin H.2010. “Estimating State Public Opinion with Multi-level Regression and Poststratification using R.” Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University.
30.
KeyV. O.1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
KreitzerRebecca J.HamiltonAllison J.TolbertCaroline J.2014. “Does Policy Adoption Change Opinions on Minority Rights? The Effects of Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage.” Political Research Quarterly67 (4): 795–808.
33.
LascherEdward L. J. R.HagenMichael G.RochlinSteven A.1996. “Gun behind the Door? Ballot Initiatives, State Policies and Public Opinion.” The Journal of Politics58 (3): 760–75.
34.
LaxJeffrey R.PhillipsJustin H.2009a. “Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review103 (3): 367–86.
35.
LaxJeffrey R.PhillipsJustin H.2009b. “How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in the States?” American Journal of Political Science53 (1): 107–21.
36.
LaxJeffrey R.PhillipsJustin H.2012. “The Democratic Deficit in the States.” American Journal of Political Science56 (1): 148–66.
37.
LeemannLucasWasserfallenFabio. 2016. “The Democratic Effect of Direct Democracy.” American Political Science Review110 (4): 750–62.
38.
LewisDaniel C.2011a. “Bypassing the Representational Filter? Minority Rights Policies under Direct Democracy Institutions in the U.S. States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly11 (2): 198–222.
39.
LewisDaniel C.2011b. “Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the U.S. States.” Social Science Quarterly92 (2): 364–83.
40.
LewisDaniel C.2013. Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: A Critical Assessment of the Tyranny of the Majority in the American States. New York: Routledge.
41.
LewisDaniel C.SchneiderSaundra K.JacobyWilliam G.2015. “The Impact of Direct Democracy on State Spending Priorities.” Electoral Studies40:531–38.
42.
LewisDaniel C.WoodFrederick S.JacobsmeierMatthew L.2014. “Public Opinion and Judicial Behavior in Direct Democracy Systems: Gay Rights in the American States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly14 (4): 367–88.
43.
LupiaArthurKrupnikovYannaLevineAdam SethPistonSpencerVon Hagen-JamarAlexander. 2010. “Why State Constitutions Differ in Their Treatment of Same-Sex Marriage.” The Journal of Politics72 (4): 1222–35.
44.
MaestasCherie. 2000. “Professional Legislatures and Ambitious Politicians: Policy Responsiveness of State Institutions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly25 (4): 663–90.
45.
ManwellerMathew. 2004. The People vs. the Courts: Initiative Elites, Judicial Review and Direct Democracy in the American Legal System. Bethesda: Academic Press.
46.
MatsusakaJohn G.1995. “Fiscal Effects of the Voter Initiative: Evidence from the Last 30 Years.” Journal of Political Economy103 (3): 587–623.
47.
MatsusakaJohn G.2001. “Problems with a Methodology Used to Test the Responsiveness of Policy to Public Opinion in Initiative States.” The Journal of Politics63 (4): 1250–63.
48.
MatsusakaJohn G.2010. “Popular Control of Public Policy: A Quantitative Approach.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science5 (2): 133–67.
49.
MatsusakaJohn G.McCartyNolan M.2001. “Political Resource Allocation: Benefits and Costs of Voter Initiatives.” Journal of Law Economics & Organization17 (2): 413–48.
50.
McCloskyHerbertBrillAlida. 1983. Dimensions of Tolerance: What Americans Believe about Civil Liberties. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
51.
MonoganJamesGrayVirginiaLoweryDavid. 2009. “Public Opinion, Organized Interests, and Policy Congruence in Initiative and Noninitiative U.S. States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly9 (3): 304–24.
52.
PachecoJulianna. 2011. “Using National Surveys to Measure Dynamic State Public Opinion: A Guideline for Scholars and an Application.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly11 (4): 415–39.
53.
PachecoJulianna. 2013. “The Thermostatic Model of Responsiveness in the American States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly13 (3): 306–32.
54.
PachecoJulianna. 2014. “Measuring and Evaluating Changes in State Opinion across Eight Issues.” American Politics Research42 (6): 986–1009.
55.
ParkDavid K.GelmanAndrewBafumiJoseph. 2004. “Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls.” Political Analysis12 (4): 375–85.
56.
PiersonPaul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics45 (4): 595–628.
57.
PinelloDaniel R.2006. America’s Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
PippenJohnBowlerShaunDonovanTodd. 2002. “Election Reform and Direct Democracy: Campaign Finance Regulations in the American States.” American Politics Research30 (6): 559–82.
59.
RanneyAustin. 1976. “Parties in State Politics.” In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, edited by JacobHerbertVinesKenneth N., 51-92. Boston: Little, Brown.
60.
RugglesStevenGenadekKatieGoekenRonaldGroverJosiahSobekMatthew. 2015. “Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 6.0” [dataset]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. doi:10.18128/D010.V6.0.
61.
SchneiderSaundra K.JacobyWilliam G.2006. “Citizen Influences on State Policy Priorities: The Interplay of Public Opinion and Interest Groups.” In Public Opinion in State Politics, edited by CohenJeffrey E., 183-208. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
62.
SquirePeverill. 1992. “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17 (1): 69–79.
63.
SquirePeverill. 2007. “Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly7 (2): 211–27.
64.
StoutenboroughJames W.Haider-MarkelDonald P.2008. “Public Confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court: A New Look at the Impact of Court Decisions.” The Social Science Journal45 (1): 28–47.
65.
StoutenboroughJames W.Haider-MarkelDonald P.MahalleyD. Allen. 2006. “Reassessing the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Public Opinion: Gay Civil Rights Cases.” Political Research Quarterly59 (3): 419–33.
66.
SullivanJ. W.1893. Direct Legislation by the Citizenship through the Initiative and Referendum. New York: True Nationalist Publishing.
67.
TaylorJami K.LewisDaniel C.JacobsmeierMatthew L.DiSarroBrian. 2012. “Content and Complexity in Policy Reinvention and Diffusion: Gay and Transgender-Inclusive Laws against Discrimination.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly12 (1): 92–115.
