This article examines how the institutional characteristics of state legislatures and governors affect state policy priorities. We argue that differences in the nature of their respective constituencies lead legislators to press for particularized benefits while governors favor collective goods. Empirical analysis of state-level data from 1982 through 2011 confirms that this is the case. The organizational arrangements of the two branches of government have an impact that is usually greater than that of state public opinion but generally less than that of state interest groups. The results from this analysis are important because they show that institutional structure has systematic effects that are independent of ideology, partisanship, and the other factors that are known to shape state policy making.
AidtToke S.ShvetsJulia. 2012. “Distributive Politics and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Seven US State Legislatures.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy4 (3): 1–29.
2.
AldrichJohn H.2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
AltJames E.LowryRobert C.2000. “A Dynamic Model of State Budget Outcomes under Divided Partisan Government.” Journal of Politics62 (4): 1035–69.
4.
BallaSteven J.LawrenceEric D.MaltzmanForrestSigelmanLee. 2002. “Partisanship, Blame Avoidance, and the Distribution of Legislative Pork.” American Journal of Political Science46 (3): 515–25.
5.
BaronDavid P.FerejohnJohn. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review83 (4): 1181–206.
6.
BarrilleauxCharlesBerkmanMichael. 2003. “Do Governors Matter? Budgeting Rules and the Politics of State Policymaking.” Political Research Quarterly56 (4): 409–17.
7.
BattistaJames Coleman.2014. “Leadership in the States.” Unpublished manuscript, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
8.
BermanDavid R.2007. “Legislative Climate.” In Institutional Change in American Politics: The Case of Term Limits, eds. KurtzKarl T.CainBruceNiemiRichard G.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 107–230.
9.
BerryWilliam D.BerkmanMichael B.SchneidermanStuart. 2000. “Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection: The Development of Institutional Boundaries.” American Political Science Review94 (4): 859–74.
10.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvanFordingRichardHansonRussell L.1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science42:327–48.
11.
BesleyTimothyCaseAnne. 1995. “Does Electoral Accountability Affect Economic Policy Choices? Evidence from Gubernatorial Term Limits.” Quarterly Journal of Economics110 (3): 769–98.
12.
BesleyTimothyCaseAnne. 2003. “Political Institutions and Policy Choices: Evidence from the United States.” Journal of Economic Literature41 (1): 7–73.
13.
BeyleThad L.1968. “The Governor’s Formal Powers: A View from the Governor’s Chair.” Public Administration Review28 (6):540–5.
BeyleThad L.FergusonMargaret. 2008. “Governors and the Executive Branch.” In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. 9th ed., eds. GrayVirginiaHansonRussell L.KousserThad, pp. 192–228. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
BudgeIanHofferbertRichard I.1990. “Mandates and Policy Outputs: U.S. Party Platforms and Federal Expenditures.” American Political Science Review84 (1): 111–31.
18.
CainBruce E.KousserThad, and Public Policy Institute of California. 2004. Adapting to Term Limits: Recent Experiences and New Directions. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
19.
CareyJohn M.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W.MoncriefGary F.2006. “The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures: A New Survey of the 50 States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly31 (1): 105–34.
20.
ChenJoweiMalhotraNeil. 2007. “The Law of k/n: The Effect of Chamber Size on Government Spending in Bicameral Legislatures.” American Political Science Review101 (4): 657–76.
21.
ClucasRichard A.2001. “Principal-Agent Theory and the Power of State House Speakers.” Legislative Studies Quarterly26 (2): 319–38.
22.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMathew D.1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
CoxGary W.McCubbinsMathew D.2005. Setting the Legislative Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
CrainW. Mark. 2003. Volatile States: Institutions, Policy, and the Performance of American State Economies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
25.
CrainW. MarkMiller IIIJames C. 1990. “Budget Process and Spending Growth.” William & Mary Law Review31 (4): 1021–46.
26.
DometriusNelson C.WrightDeil S.2010. “Governors, Legislatures, and State Budgets across Time.” Political Research Quarterly63 (4): 783–95.
27.
ElazarDaniel Judah. 1984. American Federalism: A View from the States. 3rd ed.New York: Harper & Row.
28.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
EscalerasMonica P.CalcagnoPeter T.2009. “Does the Gubernatorial Term Limit Type Affect State Government Expenditures?” Public Finance Review37 (5): 572–95.
30.
FergusonMargaret Robertson. 2003. “Chief Executive Success in the Legislative Arena.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly3 (2): 158–82.
31.
GammGeraldKousserThad. 2010. “Broad Bills or Particularistic Policy? Historical Patterns in American State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review104 (1): 151–70.
32.
GarandJames C.1985. “Partisan Change and Shifting Expenditure Priorities in the American States, 1945–1978.” American Politics Quarterly14 (4): 355–91.
33.
GarandJames C.HendrickRebecca M.1991. “Expenditure Tradeoffs in the American States: A Longitudinal Test, 1948–1984.” Western Political Quarterly44 (4): 915–40.
34.
GoodmanDoug. 2007. “Determinants of Perceived Gubernatorial Budgetary Influence among State Executive Budget Analysts and Legislative Fiscal Analysts.” Political Research Quarterly60 (1): 43–54.
35.
GrayVirginiaLoweryDavid. 1996. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36.
GrayVirginiaLoweryDavid. 2001. “The Institutionalization of State Communities of Organized Interests.” Political Research Quarterly54:265–84.
37.
GrayVirginiaLoweryDavidFellowesMatthewMcAteeAndrea. 2004. “Public Opinion, Public Policy, and Organized Interests in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly57 (3): 411–20.
38.
HammKeith E.MoncriefGary F.2012. “Legislative Politics in the States: A Comparative Analysis.” In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. 9th ed., eds. GrayVirginiaHansonRussell L.KousserThad, pp. 163–207. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
HoganRobert E.2008. “Policy Responsiveness and Incumbent Reelection in State Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 858–73.
41.
HuberEvelyneStephensJohn D.2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
JacobyWilliam G.SchneiderSaundra K.2001. “Variability in State Policy Priorities: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Politics63 (2): 544–68.
43.
JacobyWilliam G.SchneiderSaundra K.2009. “A New Measure of Policy Spending Priorities in the American States.” Political Analysis17 (1): 1–24.
44.
JacobyWilliam G.SchneiderSaundra K.2014. “Replication Data for: A New Measure of Policy Spending Priorities in the American States.” http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/27744 (accessed April 28, 2015).
45.
JewellMalcolm E.1982. “The Neglected World of State Politics.” Journal of Politics44 (3): 638–57.
46.
JohnsonJoseph M.Mark CrainW.2004. “Effects of Term Limits on Fiscal Performance: Evidence from Democratic Nations.” Public Choice119 (1–2): 73–90.
47.
JoycePhilip G.MullinsDaniel R.1991. “The Changing Fiscal Structure of the State and Local Public Sector: The Impact of Tax and Expenditure Limitations.” Public Administration Review51 (3): 240–53.
48.
KlingmanDavidLammersWilliam W.1984. “The ‘General Policy Liberalism’ Factor in American State Politics.” American Journal of Political Science28 (3): 598–610.
49.
KousserThad. 2005. Term Limits and the Dismantling of State Legislative Professionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
KousserThadPhillipsJustin H.2009. “Who Blinks First? Legislative Patience and Bargaining with Governors.” Legislative Studies Quarterly34 (1): 55–86.
51.
KousserThadPhillipsJustin H.2012. The Power of American Governors: Winning on Budgets and Losing on Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
KrupnikovYannaShipanCharles. 2012. “Measuring Gubernatorial Budgetary Power: A New Approach.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly12 (4): 438–55.
53.
LazarusJeffrey. 2009. “Party, Electoral Vulnerability, and Earmarks in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics71 (3): 1050–61.
54.
LoweryDavidGrayVirginiaCluveriusJohnHardenJeffrey. 2013. “Explaining the Anomalous Growth of Public Sector Lobbying in the American States, 1997–2007.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism43 (4): 580–99.
55.
MaestasCherie. 2000. “Professional Legislatures and Ambitious Politicians: Policy Responsiveness of State Institutions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly25 (4): 663–90.
56.
MaestasCherie. 2003. “The Incentive to Listen: Progressive Ambition, Resources, and Opinion Monitoring among State Legislators.” Journal of Politics65 (2): 439–56.
57.
MartoranoNancy. 2004. “Distributing Power: Exploring the Relative Powers of Presiding Officers and Committees in the State Legislative Process.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meetings of American Political Science Association, September 2–5, Chicago, IL.
58.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
59.
MoncriefGary F.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W.2004. “Time, Term Limits, and Turnover: Trends in Membership Stability in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly29 (3): 357–81.
60.
MooneyChristopher Z.2001. “State Politics and Policy Quarterly and the Study of State Politics: The Editors Introduction.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly1 (1): 1–4.
61.
MooneyChristopher Z.2013. “Explaining Legislative Leadership Influence: Simple Collective Action or Conditional Explanations?” Political Research Quarterly66 (3): 559–71.
62.
NewMichael J.2010. “US State Tax and Expenditure Limitations: A Comparative Political Analysis.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly10 (1): 25–50.
63.
PetersonPaul E.1995. The Price of Federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
64.
RanneyAustin. 1976. “Parties in State Politics.” In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, eds. JacobHerbertVinesKenneth N., pp. 58–65. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
65.
RingquistEvan J.GarandJames C.1999. “Policy Change in the American States.” In American State and Local Politics: Directions for the Twenty-first Century, eds. WeberRonald E.BracePaul, pp. 268–99. New York: Chatham House Publishers.
Sarbaugh-ThompsonMarjorie. 2010. “Measuring ‘Term Limitedness’ in U.S. Multi-state Research.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly10 (2): 199–217.
68.
SchlesingerJoseph A.1965. “The Politics of the Executive.” In Politics in the American States, eds. JacobHerbertVinesKenneth N., pp. 207–37. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
69.
SchneiderSaundra K.JacobyWilliam G.2006. “Citizen Influences on State Policy Priorities: The Interplay of Public Opinion and Interest Groups.” In Public Opinion in State Politics, ed. CohenJeffrey E.Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 183–208.
70.
ShadbegianRonald J.1996. “Do Tax and Expenditure Limitations Affect the Size and Growth of State Government?” Contemporary Economic Policy14 (1): 22–35.
71.
ShepsleKenneth A.WeingastBarry R.1981. “Political Preferences for the Pork Barrel: A Generalization.” American Journal of Political Science25 (1): 96–111.
72.
SigelmanLeeDometriusNelson C.1988. “Governors as Chief Executives: The Linkage between Formal Powers and Informal Influence.” American Politics Research16 (2): 157–70.
73.
SquirePeverill. 1992. “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17 (1): 69–79.
74.
SquirePeverill. 1993. “Professionalization and Public Opinion of State Legislatures.” Journal of Politics55 (2): 479–91.
75.
SquirePeverill. 2007. “Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly7 (2): 211–27.
76.
SquirePeverill. 2012. The Evolution of American Legislatures: Colonies, Territories, and States, 1619–2009. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
77.
SquirePeverillHammKeith E.2005. 101 Chambers: Congress, State Legislatures, and the Future of Legislative Studies. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
78.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1983–2006. State Government Finances. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
79.
VoldenCraigWisemanAlan E.2007. “Bargaining in Legislatures over Particularistic and Collective Goods.” American Political Science Review101 (1): 79–92.
80.
WalkerJack L.1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations among the U.S. States.” American Political Science Review63 (3): 880–99.
81.
WeberRonald E.1999. “The Quality of State Legislative Representation: A Critical Assessment.” Journal of Politics61 (3): 609–27.
82.
WeingastBarry R.1979. “A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms.” American Journal of Political Science23 (2): 245–62.
83.
WeingastBarry R.ShepsleKenneth A.JohnsonChristopher. 1981. “The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics.” Journal of Political Economy96:132–63.
84.
WooldridgeJeffrey M.2006. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 3rd ed.Mason, OH: Thomson Southwestern.
85.
WrightGerald C.Jr.EriksonRobert S.McIverJohn P.1987. “Public Opinion and Policy Liberalism in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science31 (4): 980–1001.
