We present a new unified dataset of common-space ideal points, committee assignments, and financial interests for all state legislators in 1999. We describe the compilation of the dataset and offer a few possible applications.
AnsolabehereStephenSnyderJamesStewartCharles. 2001. “The Effects of Party and Preferences on Congressional Roll Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly26:533-572.
2.
BattistaJames Coleman. 2008. “Interest Over-Representation in State Legislative Committees.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the MPSA, Chicago. April 4.
3.
BattistaJames Coleman. 2009. “Why Information? Choosing Committee Informativeness in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly34:379–97.
4.
CareyJohn M.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W. 2000. State Legislative Survey and Contextual Data, 1995: [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Columbus, OH: Kathleen Carr, Ohio State University, Polimetrics Lab [producer], 1995. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
5.
CareyJohn M.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W.MoncriefGary. 2008. 2002 State Legislative Survey [Computer file]. ICPSR20960-v1. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
6.
CarseyThomas M.BerryWilliam D.NiemiRichard G.PowellLynda W.SnyderJames M.2008. State Legislative Election Returns, 1967-2003. ICPSR21480- v1. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina [producer], 2007. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
ClarkJennifer HayesOsbornTracyWinburnJonathanWrightGerald C.2009. “Representation in U.S. Legislatures: The Acquisition and Analysis of U.S. State Legislative Roll-Call Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly9(3): 356–70.
10.
ClintonJoshuaJackmanSimonRiversDouglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll-Call Data.” American Political Science Review98:355–70.
11.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
GilliganThomas W.KrehbielKeith. 1990. “Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules with a Heterogeneous Committee.” American Journal of Political Science33:459–90.
13.
JacksonJohn E.KingdonJohn W.1992. “Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes.” American Journal of Political Science36:805–23.
14.
MaddoxH. W. Jerome. 2004. “Workinsg Outside of the State House (and Senate): Outside Careers as an Indicator of Professionalism in American State Legislatures.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly4:211–26.
15.
PeressMichaelSpirlingArthur. 2010. “Scaling the Critics: Uncovering Latent Dimensions of Movie Criticism with an Item Response Approach.” Journal of the American Statistical Association105:71–83.
16.
PooleKeith T.1998. “Recovering a Basic Space from a Set of Issue Scales.” American Journal of Political Science42:954–93.
17.
PooleKeith T.2001. “The Geometry of Multidimensional Quadratic Utility in Models of Parliamentary Roll Call Voting.” Political Analysis9:211–26.
18.
PooleKeith T.2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
PooleKeith T.HowardRosenthal. 1991. “Patterns of Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science35:228–78.
20.
PooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
ShorBorisMcCartyNolanBerryChristopher. 2010. “A Bridge to Somewhere: Mapping State and Congressional Ideology on a Cross-Institutional Common Space.” Legislative Studies Quarterly35:417–48.
27.
SnyderJames M.1992. “Committee Power, Structure-Induced Equilibria, and Roll Call Votes.” American Journal of Political Science36:1–30.
28.
SnyderJames M.Jr.GrosecloseTim. 2000. “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science44(2): 193–211.
29.
SossJoeSchramSanfordVartanianThomasO’BrienErin. 2001. “Setting the Terms of Relief: Explaining State Policy Choices in the Devolution Revolution.” American Journal of Political Science45:378–95.
30.
TreierShawn. 2006. “Ideal Point Estimation Using Overlapping Constraints in the Senate.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the SPSA, Atlanta. January 5–7.
31.
TreierShawn. 2009. “Problems in Comparing Preferences Across Institutions.” Paper presented at the New Ideas in Ideal Points Conference, Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, Chicago. April 17, 2009.
32.
VoetenErik. 2005. “Legislator Preferences, Ideal Points and the Spatial Model in the European Parliament.” Presented at the Conference on Legislative behavior in the U.S., Europe and Beyond. Berkeley, CA. February 25.
33.
WeingastBarry R.MarshallWilliam J.1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; Or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets.” Journal of Political Economy96:132–63.
34.
WrightGerald C.2004. Representation in America’s Legislatures. Indiana University, National Science Foundation Grant.
35.
WrightGerald C.WinburnJon. 2002. “Patterns of Constituency-Legislator Policy Congruence in the States.” Paper presented at the Second Annual Conference on State Politics and Policy, Milwaukee. May 24–25.
36.
WrightGerald C.OsbornTracy. 2002. “Party and Roll Call Voting in the American Legislature.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the MPSA, Chicago. April 25–28.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
