We construct measures of U.S. state partisan identification, self-reported ideology, and policy mood using data from the 2000 and 2004 National Annenberg Election Surveys (NAES) and the 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES). These measures improve on existing methods for estimating state-level preferences because the surveys provide larger state samples without pooling across years. After detailing our methods for constructing the measures, we assess their validity through comparisons with measures already in use by scholars of state politics. We find that our measures correlate strongly with those created by Erikson, Wright, and McIver (1993) and Berry et al. (1998) and with measures from state-level polls. We conclude that our measures can be useful to research in state politics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aggregated CBS News/New York Times national polls [electronic file] collected by Gerald C. Wright, John P. McIver, and Robert S. Erikson. http://php.indiana.edu/∼wright1/cbs7603_pct.zip (January 4, 2010).
2.
BerrensRobert P.BoharaAlok K.Jenkins-SmithHankSilvaCarolWeimarDavid L.. 2003. “The Advent of Internet Surveys for Political Research.” Political Analysis11: 1–23.
3.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science42: 327–48.
4.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 2007. “The Measurement and Stability of State Citizen Ideology.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly7: 111–32.
5.
BracePaulSims-ButlerKellieArceneauxKevinJohnsonMartin. 2002. “Public Opinion in the American States: New Perspectives Using National Survey Data.” American Journal of Political Science46: 173–89.
6.
BracePaulArceneauxKevinJohnsonMartinUlbigStacy G.. 2004. “Does State Political Ideology Change Over Time?” Political Research Quarterly57: 529–40.
7.
BracePaulArceneauxKevinJohnsonMartinUlbigStacy G.. 2007. “Reply to ‘The Measurement and Stability of State Citizen Ideology.'’” State Politics and Policy Quarterly7: 133–40.
8.
Carl Vinson Institute of Government, University of Georgia.2007. Peach State Poll, Number 10. hdl:1902.29/D-33558 Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina [Distributor].
9.
Center for Public Interest Polling/Eagleton Poll. Poll #127, September 2000. www.scc.rutgers.edu/eagleton (January 4, 2010).
10.
Center for Public Interest Polling/Eagleton Poll. Poll #146, March 2004. www.scc.rutgers.edu/eagleton (January 4, 2010).
11.
Center for Public Interest Polling/Eagleton Poll. Poll #158, March 2006. www.scc.rutgers.edu/eagleton (January 4, 2010).
12.
Center for Survey Research, The Ohio State University.2006. Buckeye State Poll, August 2000. hdl:1902.29/D-33520 Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina [Distributor].
13.
ConversePhilip. 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In Ideology and Discontent, ed., ApterDavid. New York, NY: Free Press.
14.
EriksonRobert S.1976. “The Relationship Between Public Opinion and State Policy: A New Look Based on Some Forgotten Data.” American Journal of Political Science20: 25–36.
15.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.. 2006. Public Opinion in the States: A Quarter-Century of Change and Stability. In Public Opinion in State Politics, ed., CohenJeffrey E.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.. 2007. “Measuring the Public's Ideological Preferences in the 50 States: Responses Versus Roll Call Data.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly7: 141–51.
18.
Field (California) Poll, Late February-Early March 2000 [machine-readable data file]. San Francisco, CA: The Field Institute, 2000, Field (California) Poll 00-02.
19.
Field (California) PollMay 2004 [machine-readable data file]. San Francisco, CA: Field Research Corporation, 2004, Field (California) Poll 04-03.
20.
Field (California) Poll Mid-Late February 2006 [machine-readable data file]. San Francisco, CA: Field Research Corporation, 2006, Field (California) Poll 06-01.
21.
Florida Annual Policy Survey2000. Tallahassee, FL: Survey Research Laboratory, Florida State University. www.fsu.edu/∼survey/FAPS/index.htm#Reports (January 4, 2010).
22.
Florida Annual Policy Survey2003-2004. Tallahassee, FL: Survey Research Laboratory, Florida State University. www.fsu.edu/∼survey/FAPS/index.htm#Reports (January 4, 2010).
23.
GrayVirginiaLoweryDavidFellowesMatthewMcAteeAndrea. 2004. “Public Opinion, Public Policy, and Organized Interests in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly57: 411–20.
24.
HillSethLoJamesVavreckLynnZallerJohn. 2007. The Opt-in Internet Panel: Survey Mode, Sampling Methodology and the Implications for Political Research. University of California at Los Angeles. CCES Manuscript. http://web.mit.edu/polisci/portl/cces/material/HillLoVavreckZaller2007.pdf (May 21, 2008).
25.
John Hazen White Sr. Public Opinion Laboratory, Brown University.2000. The Rhode Island Survey, August 2000. hdl:1902.29/D-31567 Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina [Distributor].
26.
KaltonGrahamFlores-CervantesIsmael. 2003. “Weighting Methods.” Journal of Official Statistics19: 81–97.
27.
LaxJeffrey R.PhillipsJustin H.. 2009. “How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in the States?” American Journal of Political Science53: 107–21.
28.
LevenduskyMatthew S.PopeJeremy C.. 2008. The Distribution of Economic Public Opinion in the American States. Presented at the Eighth Annual Conference on State Politics and Policy, Philadelphia, PA, May 2008.
29.
MalhotraNeilKrosnickJon A.. 2007. “The Effect of Survey Mode and Sampling on Inferences about Political Attitudes and Behavior: Comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to Internet Surveys with Non-Probability Samples.” Political Analysis15: 286–323.
30.
NorranderBarbara. 2001. “Measuring State Public Opinion with the Senate National Election Study.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly1: 111–25.
31.
ParkDavid K.GelmanAndrewBafumiJoseph. 2004. “Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls.” Political Analysis12: 375–85.
32.
ParkDavid K.GelmanAndrewBafumiJoseph. 2006. State-Level Opinion from National Surveys: Poststratification Using Multilevel Logistic Regression. In Public Opinion in State Politics, ed., CohenJeffrey E.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
ParryJanine A.KisidaBrianLangleyRonald E.. 2008. “The State of State Polls: Old Challenges, New Opportunities.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly8: 198–216.
34.
R Development Core Team.2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.r-project.org (January 4, 2010).
RomerDanielKenskiKateWinnegKennethAdasiewiczChristopherHall JamiesonKathleen. 2006. Capturing Campaign Dynamics 2000 & 2004: The National Annenberg Election Survey. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
37.
School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.2000. Carolina Poll Spring 2000. hdl:1902.29/D-31485 Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [Distributor].
38.
School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.2006-03. Carolina Poll, Fall 2004. hdl:1902.29/D-33439 Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill [Distributor].
39.
SidesJohnCitrinJack. 2007. How Large the Huddled Masses? The Causes and Consequences of Public Misperceptions about Immigrant Populations. Presented at the 2007 Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.
40.
Social Research Laboratory, Northern Arizona University.2001. Grand Canyon State Poll, Fall 2000. hdl:1902.29/D-31604 Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina [Distributor].
41.
SorensJasonMuediniFaitRugerWilliam P.. 2008. “U.S. State and Local Public Policies in 2006: A New Database.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly8: 309–26.
42.
StataCorp.2007. Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
43.
StimsonJames A.1991. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder, CO: Westview.
44.
Survey Research Center, University of Arkansas.2004-11. Arkansas Poll, 2000. hdl:1902.29/D-31654 Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina [Distributor].
45.
Survey Research Center, University of Arkansas.2008-10. Arkansas Poll, 2004. hdl: 1902.29/10331 UNF:3:KnUIxk+iGOsf44U3OCbRlQ Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina [Distributor].
46.
Survey Research Center, University of Arkansas.2008-10. Arkansas Poll, 2006. hdl:1902.29/10344 UNF:3:aiR5QTfKsrXmxeiSDoiN9A Odum Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina [Distributor].
47.
WrightGerald C.EriksonRobert S.McIverJohn P.. 1985. “Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology with Survey Data.” The Journal of Politics47: 469–89.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
