In order to understand what factors drive child welfare policymaking, this research analyzes data on spending and legislation from the U.S. states over a three-year period. The key independent variables are scandal, litigation, federal oversight, and local discretion. While states that experience a scandal or a lawsuit do not increase their spending levels over previous years, they do enact more child welfare legislation. This raises the possibility that states engage in symbolic rather than substantive responses to child welfare crises. The administrative structure of the child welfare system also affects state policymaking.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchenChristopher H.2000. “Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Dependent Variables.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Los Angeles, CA.
2.
ArceneauxKevinHuberGregory A.. 2007. “What to Do (and Not Do) with Multicollinearity in State Politics Research.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly70: 81–101.
3.
BailieKathleen A.1998. “The Other Neglected Parties in Child Protective Proceedings: Parents in Poverty and the Role of the Lawyers Who Represent Them.” Fordham Law Review66: 2298–301.
4.
BerryWilliam D.1990. “The Confusing Case of Budgetary Incrementalism: Too Many Meanings for a Single Concept.” The Journal of Politics52: 167–96.
5.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science42: 327–48.
6.
BessRoseanaLeos-UrbelJacobGeenRob. 2001. The Cost of Protecting Vulnerable Children II: What has changed since 1996? The Urban Institute. www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=310071 (March 17, 2009).
7.
BessRoseanaAndrews ScarcellaCynthia. 2004. Child Welfare Spending During a Time of Fiscal Stress. The Urban Institute. www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=411124 (March 17, 2009).
8.
BirklandThomas A.1997. After Disaster: Agenda-Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
9.
BrooksSusan L.2001. “The Case for Adoption Alternatives.” Family Court Review39: 43–57.
10.
ButlerIanDrakefordMark. 2003. Social Policy, Social Welfare and Scandal: How British Public Policy is Made. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.
Child Welfare League of America.2005. Child Welfare Consent Decrees: Analysis of Thirty-Five Court Actions from 1995 to 2005. www.cwla.org/advocacy/consentdecrees.pdf (March 17, 2009).
12.
Council of State Governments.2002-04. The Book of the States, Vols. 34-36. Lexington, KY: The Council of State Governments.
13.
ElazarDaniel J.1984. American Federalism: A View from the States, 3rd ed.New York, NY: Harper and Row.
14.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.McIverJohn P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15.
GeenRobTumlinKaren C.. 1999. State Efforts to Remake Child Welfare: Responses to New Challenges and Increased Scrutiny. Occasional Paper Number 29. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
16.
GilensMartin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Anti-poverty Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
HeroRodney E.1998. Faces of Inequality: Social Diversity in American Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
KingGaryTomzMichaelWittenbergJason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science44: 347–61.
19.
KingdonJohn W.2002. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policy, 2nd ed.New York, NY: Longman.
20.
MezeySusan Gluck. 2000. Pitiful Plaintiffs: Child Welfare Legislation and the Federal Courts. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
OrrSusan. 1999. Child Protection at the Crossroads: Child Abuse, Child Protection, and Recommendations for Reform. Reason Public Policy Institute. Policy Study No. 262. October. www.reason.org/ps262.html (January 30, 2009).
24.
RobertsDorothy E.1999a. “Poverty, Race, and New Directions on Child Welfare Policy.” Washington University Journal of Law and Policy63: 63–77.
25.
RobertsDorothy E.1999b. Welfare's Ban on Poor Motherhood. In Whose Welfare?, ed. MinksGwendolyn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
RobertsDorothy E.2002. Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare. New York, NY: Basic Civitas Books.
27.
RosenbergGerald N.1991. Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
ScarcellaCynthia AndrewsBessRoseanaHecht ZielewskiEricaGeenRob. 2006. The Cost of Protecting Vulnerable Children V: Understanding State Variation in Child Welfare Financing. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
29.
SchneiderAnne LarasonIngramHelen. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
30.
StoneDeborah. 2001. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision-Making, Revised Edition. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
31.
TomzMichaelWittenbergJasonKingGary. 2001. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.0. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu (June 1, 2001).
32.
Wilkinson-HagenAmy. 2004. “The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997: A Collision of Parens Patriae and Parents' Constitutional Rights.” Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy11: 137–68.
