This article examines the influence of several canons within state codes of judicial ethics aimed at constraining the campaigning of candidates running for U.S. state judicial office. These canons have been much debated since 2002, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that one of them, the announce clause, unconstitutionally restricted the free speech rights of candidates. Based on their likely influence on the availability of information in judicial contests, I hypothesize that the primary effect of these canons is to make incumbents less accountable to the public. Looking at U.S. state supreme court contests from 1998 to 2006 where incumbents are seeking re-election, I find strong evidence that four of the five canons make it less likely for challengers to arise, and I also find evidence that restrictions on candidate solicitation of funds favor incumbents in the general election.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramowitzAlan I.1991. “Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections.” The Journal of Politics53: 34–56.
BaumLawrence. 1983. “The Electoral Fates of Incumbent Judges in the Ohio Court of Common Pleas.” Judicature66: 24–50.
4.
BondJon R.CovingtonCaryFleisherRichard. 1985. “Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections.” The Journal of Politics47: 510–29.
5.
BonneauChris W.2004. “Patterns of Campaign Spending and Electoral Competition in State Supreme Court Elections.” Justice System Journal25: 21–39.
6.
BonneauChris W.2005a. “Electoral Verdicts: Incumbent Defeats in State Supreme Court Elections.” American Politics Research33: 818–41.
7.
BonneauChris W.2005b. “What Price Justice(s)? Understanding Campaign Spending in State Supreme Court Elections.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly5: 107–25.
8.
BonneauChris W.2007a. “Campaign Fundraising in State Supreme Court Elections.” Social Science Quarterly88: 68–85.
9.
BonneauChris W.2007b. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in State Supreme Court Elections.” Political Research Quarterly60: 489–99.
10.
BonneauChris W.Gann HallMelinda. 2003. “Predicting Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections: Context and the Politics of Institutional Design.” Political Research Quarterly56: 337–49.
11.
BowenLauren. 1995. “Attorney Advertising in the Wake of Bates v. State Bar of Arizona (1977): A Study of Judicial Impact.” American Politics Quarterly23: 461–84.
12.
BracePaulGann HallMelinda. 1990. “Neo-Institutionalism and Dissent in State Supreme Courts.” The Journal of Politics52: 54–70.
13.
BracePaulGann HallMelinda. 1995. “Studying the Courts Comparatively: A View from the American States.” Political Research Quarterly48: 5–29.
CaufieldRachel Paine. 2005. “In the Wake of White: How States are Responding to Republican Party of Minnesota v. White and How Judicial Elections are Changing.” Akron Law Review38: 625–47.
20.
CaufieldRachel Paine. 2007. The Changing Tone of Judicial Election Campaigns as a Result of White In Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections, ed. StrebMatthew J.. New York, NY: New York University Press.
21.
CauthenJames N.G.Scott PetersC.. 2003. “Courting Constituents: District Elections and Judicial Behavior on the Louisiana Supreme Court.” Justice System Journal24: 265–82.
22.
DuboisPhilip L.1979. “The Significance of Voting Cues in State Supreme Court Elections.” Law & Society Review13: 757–79.
23.
DuboisPhilip L.1980. From Ballot to Bench: Judicial Elections and the Quest for Accountability. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
24.
DuboisPhilip L.1984. “Voting Cues in Nonpartisan Trial Court Elections: A Multivariate Assessment.” Law & Society Review18: 395–436.
25.
Family Trust Foundation of Kentucky v. Wolnitzek, 345 F. Supp. 2d 672 (2004).
26.
GibsonJames L.2008. “Challenges to the Impartiality of State Supreme Courts: Legitimacy Theory and ‘New Style’ Judicial Campaigns.” American Political Science Review102: 57–76.
27.
GierzynskiAnthonyBreauxDavid. 1991. “Money and Votes in State Legislative Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly16: 203–17.
28.
GierzynskiAnthonyBreauxDavid. 1996. “Legislative Elections and the Importance of Money.” Legislative Studies Quarterly21: 337–57.
29.
GoidelRobert K.GrossDonald A.. 1994. “A Systems Approach to Campaign Finance in the U.S. House Elections.” American Politics Quarterly22: 125–53.
30.
GoidelRobert K.GrossDonald A.. 1996. “Reconsidering ‘Myths and Realities’ of Campaign Finance Reform.” Legislative Studies Quarterly21: 129–49.
GreenDonald P.KrasnoJonathan S.. 1988. “Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science32: 884–907.
35.
GreenDonald P.KrasnoJonathan S.. 1990. “Rebuttal to Jacobson's New Evidence for Old Arguments.” American Journal of Political Science34: 363–72.
36.
HallKermit. 1983. “The Judiciary on Trial: State Constitutional Reform and the Rise of an Elected Judiciary, 1846-1860.” The Historian45: 337–54.
37.
HallMelinda Gann. 1992. “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting on State Supreme Courts.” The Journal of Politics54: 427–46.
38.
HallMelinda Gann. 1995. “Justices as Representatives: Elections and Judicial Politics in the American States.” American Politics Quarterly23: 485–503.
39.
HallMelinda Gann. 2001. “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform.” American Political Science Review95: 315–30.
40.
HallMelinda GannBonneauChris W.. 2006. “Does Quality Matter? Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections.” American Journal of Political Science50: 20–33.
41.
HallMelinda GannBracePaul. 1992. “Toward an Integrated Model of Judicial Voting Behavior.” American Politics Quarterly20: 147–68.
42.
HeckmanJames J.1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica47: 153–61.
43.
HerrnsonPaul S.2004. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington, 4th ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
44.
HojnackiMarieBaumLawrence. 1992. “‘New Style’ Judicial Campaigns and the Voters: Economic Issues and Union Members in Ohio.” Western Political Quarterly45: 921–48.
45.
HolbrookThomas A.Van DunkEmily. 1993. “Electoral Competition in the American States.” American Political Science Review87: 955–62.
46.
JacobsonGary C.1978. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review72: 468–91.
47.
JacobsonGary C.1980. Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
48.
JacobsonGary C.1990. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments.” American Journal of Political Science34: 334–62.
49.
JacobsonGary C.2001. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 5th ed.New York, NY: Longman.
50.
JewellMalcolm E.1982. Representation in State Legislatures. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
51.
JewellMalcolm E.BreauxDavid. 1988. “The Effect of Incumbency on State Legislative Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly13: 495–514.
52.
Kansas Judicial Watch v. Stout, Civil Action Number 06-4056-JAR (July 19, 2006).
KleinDavidBaumLawrence. 2001. “Ballot Information and Voting Decisions in Judicial Elections.” Political Research Quarterly54: 709–28.
55.
KrasnoJonathan S.GreenDonald P.. 1988. “Preempting Quality Challengers in House Elections.” The Journal of Politics50: 920–36.
56.
LaymanJames. 2006. “Judicial Campaign Speech Regulation: Integrity or Incentives.” Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics19: 769–80.
57.
LovrichNicholas P.Jr.SheldonCharles H.. 1983. “Voters in Contested, Nonpartisan Judicial Elections: A Responsible Electorate or a Problematic Public?” Western Political Quarterly36: 241–56.
58.
National Institute for Money in State Politics.Electronic Database. www.followthemoney.org.
59.
NakanishiMasaoCooperLee G.KassarjianHarold H.. 1974. “Voting for a Political Candidate Under Conditions of Minimal Information.” Journal of Consumer Research1: 36–43.
60.
North Dakota Family Alliance v. Bader, 361 F. Supp. 2d 1021 (2005).
61.
PetersC. Scott. 2007. “Canons, Cost, and Competition in State Supreme Court Elections.” Judicature91: 27–35.
62.
PinelloDaniel R.1995. The Impact of Judicial Selection Method on State Supreme Court Policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
63.
PowellRichard J.2000. “The Impact of Term Limits on the Candidacy Decisions of State Legislators in U. S. House Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly25: 645–61.
64.
Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, 536 U.S. 765 (2002).
65.
RottmanDavid B.2002. The White Decision in the Court of Opinion: View of Judges and the General Public. Court Review39: 16.
66.
SalokarRebecca Mae. 2005. “After White: An Insider's Thoughts on Judicial Campaign Speech.” Justice System Journal26: 149–61.
SchnaffnerBrian F.StrebMatthewWrightGerald. 2001. “Teams Without Uniforms: The Nonpartisan Ballot in State and Local Elections.” Political Research Quarterly54: 7–30.
69.
SheldonCharlesLovrichNicholas. 1983. “Knowledge and Judicial Voting: The Oregon and Washington Experience.” Judicature67: 234–45.
70.
Spargo v. State Commission on Judicial Conduct, 351 F. 3d 65 (2nd Circuit 2003).
71.
SquirePeverill. 2000. “Uncontested Seats in State Legislative Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly25: 131–46.
72.
SquirePeverillSmithEric R.A.N.. 1988. “The Effect of Partisan Information on Voters in Nonpartisan Elections.” The Journal of Politics50: 169–79.
73.
Van DunkEmily. 1997. Challenger Quality in State Legislative Elections. Political Research Quarterly50: 793.
74.
Weaver v. Bonner, 309 F. 3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2002).
