We examine whether the geographic distribution of a political party's electoral support affects the divisiveness of statewide primaries. In spite of V.O. Key, Jr.'s (1956) original insight that geography might be a relevant predictor of contested statewide primaries, this hypothesis has received little attention from political scientists. We test Key's hypothesis using data on gubernatorial and U.S. Senate elections to identify the effects of electoral geography on the structure of competition in primary elections. We contend that dispersed bases of electoral support greatly increase the costs associated with maintaining party cohesion. Our findings support the theory that a geographically dispersed electorate heightens the potential for intraparty factionalism. These results are robust across several measures of the dependent variable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramowitzAlan I.SegalJeffrey A.. 1992. Senate Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
2.
AldrichJohn H.2000. “Presidential Address: Southern Parties in State and Nation.” The Journal of Politics62: 643–70.
3.
AtkesonLonna Rae. 1998. “Divisive Primaries and General Election Outcomes: Another Look at Presidential Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science42: 256–71.
4.
BardwellKedron. 2002. “Money and Challenger Emergence in Gubernatorial Primaries.” Political Research Quarterly55: 653–68.
5.
BeckPaul AllenDaltonRussell J.HaynesAudrey A.HuckfeldtRobert. 1997. “Presidential Campaigning at the Grassroots.” The Journal of Politics59: 1264–75.
6.
BerelsonBernard R.LazarsfeldPaul F.McPheeWilliam N.. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BernsteinRobert A.1977. “Divisive Primaries Do Hurt: U.S. Senate Races, 1956-1972.” American Political Science Review71: 540–5.
8.
BerryWilliam D.BaybeckBrady. 2005 “Using Geographic Information Systems to Study Interstate Competition.” American Political Science Review99: 505–19.
9.
BerryWilliam D.CanonBradley C.. 1993. “Explaining the Competitiveness of Gubernatorial Primaries.” The Journal of Politics55: 454–71.
10.
BlackEarlBlackMerle. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BornRichard. 1981. “The Influence of House Primary Election Divisiveness on General Election Margins, 1962-1976.” The Journal of Politics43: 640–61.
12.
BradnerErinMarkGloria. 2002. Why Distance Matters: Effects on Cooperation, Persuasion, and Deception. Delivered at the Computer Science and Cooperative Work Conference, New Orleans, LA.
BraumoellerBear F.2004. “Hypothesis Testing and Multiplicative Interaction Terms.” International Organization58: 807–20.
15.
BurbankM.J.1995. “The Psychological Basis of Contextual Effects.” Political Geography14: 621–35.
16.
BurnsN.1994. The Formation of American Local Governments: Private Values in Public Institutions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17.
CairncrossFrances. 2001. The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution is Changing Our Lives. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
18.
CarneyMick. 1998. The Competitiveness of Networked Production: The Role of Trust and Asset Specificity. Journal of Management Studies35: 457–79.
19.
ChoWendy K. Tam. 2003. “Contagion Effects and Ethnic Contribution Networks.” American Journal of Political Science. 47: 368–87.
20.
DjupePaul A.PetersonDavid A. M.. 2002. “The Impact of Negative Campaigning: Evidence from the 1998 Senatorial Primaries.” Political Research Quarterly55: 845–60.
21.
FrendreisJohn P.GibsonJames L.VertzLaura L.. 1990. “The Electoral Relevance of Local Party Organizations.” American Political Science Review84: 225–35.
22.
FriedrichR.1982. “In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations.” American Journal of Political Science26: 797–833.
23.
GibsonJames L.CotterCornelius P.BibbyJohn F.HuckshornRobert J.. 1985. “Whither the Local Parties?: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis of the Strength of Party Organizations.” American Journal of Political Science29: 139–60.
24.
GimpelJames G.SchuknechtJason E.. 2002a. “Political and Demographic Foundations for Sectionalism in State Politics: The Connecticut Case.” American Politics Research30: 193–213.
25.
GimpelJames G.SchuknechtJason E.. 2002b. “Reconsidering Political Regionalism in the American States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly2: 325–52.
26.
GimpelJames G.SchuknechtJason E.. 2003. Patchwork Nation. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
27.
GrauCraig H.1981. “Competition in State Legislative Primaries.” Legislative Studies Quarterly6: 35–54.
28.
GreenstoneJ. David. 1969. Labor in American Politics. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
29.
GujaratiDamodar N.2003. Basic Econometrics, Fourth Edition. New York, NY: Tata McGraw-Hill.
30.
HackerAndrew1965. “Does a 'Divisive' Primary Harm a Candidate's Election Chances?” American Political Science Review59: 105–10.
31.
HardyMelissa A.1993. Regression with Dummy Variables. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
32.
HerrnsonPaul S.2004. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
33.
HerrnsonPaul S.GimpelJames G.. 1995. “District Conditions and Primary Divisiveness in Congressional Elections.” Political Research Quarterly48: 117–34.
34.
HeroRodney E.TolbertCaroline J.. 1996. “A Racial/Ethnic Diversity Interpretation of Politics and Policy in the States of the U.S.” American Journal of Political Science40: 851–71.
35.
HoganRobert E.1999. “Campaign and Contextual Influences on Voter Participation in State Legislative Elections.” American Politics Quarterly27: 403–33.
36.
HolbrookThomas M.1991. “Presidential Elections in Space and Time.” American Journal of Political Science35: 91–109.
37.
HuckfeldtRobertSpragueJohn. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in a Presidential Campaign. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
HuckshornRobert J.GibsonJames L.CotterCornelius P.BibbyJohn F.. 1986. “Party Integration and Party Organizational Strength.” The Journal of Politics48: 976–91.
39.
JacobsonGary C.2004. The Politics of Congressional Elections. New York, NY: Pearson Education Inc.
40.
JewellMalcolm E.MorehouseSarah M.. 2001. Political Parties and Elections in American States, 4th ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
41.
JewellMalcolm E.OlsonDavid M.. 1978. American State Political Parties and Elections. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.
42.
JohnstonR.J.1974. “Local Effects in Voting at a Local Election.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers64: 418–29.
43.
KaufmannKaren M.2004. The Urban Voter. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
44.
KenneyPatrick J.1988. “Sorting Out the Effects of Primary Divisiveness in Congressional and Senatorial Elections.” Western Political Quarterly41: 765–77.
45.
KenneyPatrick J.RiceTom W.. 1984. “The Effect of Primary Divisiveness in Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” The Journal of Politics46: 904–15.
46.
KenneyPatrick J.RiceTom W.. 1987. “The Relationship between Divisive Primaries and General Election Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science31: 31–44.
47.
KeyV.O. Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.
48.
KeyV.O.Jr.1956. American State Politics: An Introduction. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
49.
LeeFrances E.2005. Interests, Constituencies, and Policy Making. In The Legislative Branch, eds. QuirkP.J.BinderS. A.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
LengleJames I.1980. “Divisive Presidential Primaries and Party Electoral Prospect: 1932-1976.” American Politics Quarterly8: 261–77.
51.
MaiselSandy L.StoneWalter J.. 1997. “Determinants of Candidate Emergence in U.S. House Elections: An Exploratory Study.” Legislative Studies Quarterly22: 79–96.
52.
MorganKevin. 2004. “The Exaggerated Death of Geography: Learning, Proximity, and Territorial Innovation Systems.” Journal of Economic Geography4: 3–21.
PieresonJames E.SmithTerry B.. 1975. “Primary Divisiveness and General Election Success: A Re-Examination.” The Journal of Politics37: 555–62.
55.
PetersonPaul E.1981. City Limits. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
ReynoldsDavid R.1969. A 'Friends and Neighbors' Voting Model as a Spatial Interactional Model for Electoral Geography. In Behavioral Problems in Geography: A Symposium, eds. CoxKevin R.GolledgeReginald G., Studies in Geography, 17. Evanston, IN: Northwestern University.
57.
RaeDouglas W.1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58.
RiceTom W.1985. “Gubernatorial and Senatorial Primary Elections: Determinants of Competition.” American Politics Quarterly13: 427–46.
59.
RiceTom W.MachtAlisa A.. 1987a. “Friends and Neighbors Voting in Statewide General Elections.” American Journal of Political Science31: 448–52.
60.
RiceTom W.MachtAlisa A.. 1987b. “The Hometown Advantage: Mobilization or Conversion?” Political Behavior9: 257–62.
61.
RikerWilliam H.1962. A Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
62.
RikerWilliam H.1982. “The Two-party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review76: 753–66.
63.
SchantzHarvey L.1980. “Contested and Uncontested Primaries for the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly5: 545–62.
64.
SchattschneiderE.E.1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.
65.
SchlesingerJoseph A.1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
66.
ShawDaron R.1999. “The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearance on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988-1996.” American Political Science Review93: 345–62.
67.
ShawDaron R.2006. The Race to 270: The Electoral College and the Campaign Strategies of 2000 and 2004. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
68.
SouthwellPriscilla L.1986. “The Politics of Disgruntlement: Nonvoting and Defection Among Supporters of Nomination Losers, 1968-1984.” Political Behavior8: 81–95.
69.
SperryStephen L.2005. Are Republicans Sprawlers and Democrats New Urbanists?— Understanding the Spatial Analysis of the 2004 Presidential Vote. Clemson University, Department of Planning and Landscape Architecture.
70.
StoneClarence N.1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
71.
StoneWalter J.1986. “The Carryover Effect in Presidential Elections.” American Political Science Review80: 271–80.
72.
StoneWalter J.Rae AtkesonLonnaRappoportRonald B.. 1992. “Turning On or Turning Off? Mobilization and Demobilization Effects of Participation in Presidential Nomination Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science36: 665–91.
73.
SullivanDenis G.1977. “Party Unity: Appearance and Reality.” Political Science Quarterly92: 635–45.
74.
SullivanJohn L.1973. “Political Correlates of Social, Economic, and Religious Diversity in the American States.” The Journal of Politics35: 70–84.
75.
TatalovichRaymond. 1975. “'Friends and Neighbors' Voting: Mississippi, 1943-73.” The Journal of Politics37: 807–14.
76.
ThielemannGregory S.1993. “Local Advantage in Campaign Financing: Friends, Neighbors, and Their Money in Texas Supreme Court Elections.” The Journal of Politics55: 472–8.
77.
TufteEdward R.1974. Data Analysis for Politics and Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Yale University Press.
78.
WareAlan. 1979. “Divisive Primaries: The Important Questions.” British Journal of Political Science9: 381–4.
79.
WestlyeM.C.1985. The Effects of Primary Divisiveness on Incumbent Senators, 1968-1984. Delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA.
80.
WielhouwerPeter W.1999. “The Mobilization of Campaign Activists by the Party Canvass.” American Politics Quarterly27: 177–200.
81.
WilsonJames Q.1962. The Amateur Democrat: Club Politics in Three Cities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
