Scholars of state politics and policy have devoted little attention to the public universities where so many of them work. Public higher education is organized at the state level, and its funding and governance have been debated at length in many states in recent years. Moreover, these universities provide opportunities for contributions to a variety of theoretically-grounded research, including the decision to make or buy public services, principal-agent issues and institutional arrangements for governance, the politics of institutional reform, the determinants of government appropriations and budgetary trade-offs, and internal decisionmaking in state-owned enterprises, public bureaucracies, and nonprofit organizations. Research on these issues could not only generate insights relevant to many types of institutions and public services but also contribute to ongoing policy debates over relations between state governments and higher education.
AndrewsRhysBoyneGeorge A.MeierKenneth J.O'TooleLawrence J.Jr.WalkerRichard M.. 2005. “Representative Bureaucracy, Organizational Strategy, and Public Service Performance: An Empirical Analysis of English Local Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15: 489–504.
3.
BarrilleauxCharlesBerkmanMichael. 2003. “Do Governors Matter? Budgeting Rules and the Politics of State Policymaking.” Political Research Quarterly56: 409–17.
4.
BawnKathleen. 1995. “Political Control vs. Expertise: Congressional Choices about Administrative Procedures.” American Political Science Review89: 62–73.
5.
BergerMark C.KostalThomas. 2002. “Financial Resources, Regulation, and Enrollment in U.S. Public Higher Education.” Economics of Education Review21: 101–10.
6.
BerryWilliam D.LoweryDavid. 1990. “An Alternative Approach to Understanding Budgetary Trade-offs.” American Journal of Political Science34: 671–705.
7.
BowenFrank M.Reeves BraccoKathyCallanPatrick M.FinneyJoni E.RichardsonRichard C.Jr.TrombleyWilliam. 1997. State Structures for the Governance of Higher Education: A Comparative Study Technical Paper 97-11. San Jose, CA: The California Higher Education Policy Center.
8.
BrownJennifer. 2005. Strapped Colleges Weigh Autonomy. The Denver Post, 26 September, A-1.
9.
BrubacherJohn S.RudyWillis. 1976. Higher Education in Transition: A History of American Colleges and Universities, 1636-1976. 3rd ed.New York, NY: Harper & Row.
10.
CoatesDennisHumphreysBrad R.VachrisMichelle A.. 2004. “More Evidence that University Administrators are Utility Maximizing Bureaucrats.” Economics of Governance5: 77–101.
11.
ClotfelterCharles T.1976. “Public Spending for Higher Education: An Empirical Test of Two Hypotheses.” Public Finance31: 177–94.
12.
CohenLinda R.NollRoger G.. 1998. Universities, Constituencies, and the Role of the States. In Challenges to Research Universities, ed. NollRoger G.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
13.
deGrootHansMcMahonWalter W.Fredericks VolkweinJ.. 1991. “The Cost Structure of American Research Universities.” Review of Economics and Statistics73: 424–43.
14.
DillonSam. 2005. At Public Universities, Warnings of Privatization,The New York Times. 16 October, 12.
15.
Education Commission of the States1997. State Postsecondary Education Structures Sourcebook. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
16.
EhrenbergRonald G.1999. “Adam Smith Goes to College: An Economist Becomes an Academic Administrator.” Journal of Economic Perspectives13: 99–116.
17.
EhrenbergRonald G.KlaffDaniel B.KezsbomAdam T.NagowskiMatthew P.. 2004. Collective Bargaining in American Higher Education. In Governing Academia, ed. G EhrenbergRonald. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18.
EykampPaul W.1995. Political Control of State Research Universities: The Effect of the Structure of Political Control on University Quality and Budget. Ph.D. diss., University of California, San Diego.
19.
FieldsJoseph A.KleinLinda S.SfridisJames M.. 1997. “A Market-Based Evaluation of the Election versus Appointment of Regulatory Commissioners.” Public Choice92: 337–51.
20.
GittellMarilynScott KleimanNeil. 2000. “The Political Context of Higher Education.” American Behavioral Scientist43: 1058–91.
21.
GoldinClaudiaKatzLawrence F.. 1999. “The Shaping of Higher Education: The Formative Years in the United States, 1890 to 1940.” Journal of Economic Perspectives13: 37–62.
22.
GoudriaanRenédeGrootHans. 1991. “State Regulation and University Behavior.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization20: 309–18.
23.
HammondThomas H.2004. Herding Cats in University Hierarchies. In Governing Academia, ed. EhrenbergRonald G.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24.
HansmannHenry. 1996. The Ownership of Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
25.
HartOliverShleiferAndreiVishnyRobert W.. 1997. “The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons.” Quarterly Journal of Economics112: 1127–61.
26.
HearnJames C.GriswoldCarolyn P.. 1994. “State-Level Centralization and Policy Innovation in U.S. Postsecondary Education.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis16: 161–91.
27.
HellerDonald E.2004. State Oversight of Academia. In Governing Academia, ed. EhrenbergRonald G.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
HenkelMaryLittleBrenda. 1999. Changing Relationships between Higher Education and the State. Philadelphia, PA: J. Kingsley Publishers.
29.
HoenackStephen A.PierroDaniel J.. 1990. “An Econometric Model of a Public University's Income and Enrollments.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization14: 403–23.
30.
HornMurray J.1995. The Political Economy of Public Administration: Institutional Choice in the Public Sector. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
JamesEstelle. 1990. Decision Processes and Priorities in Higher Education. In The Economics of American Universities: Management, Operations and Fiscal Environment, eds. HoenackStephen A.CollinsEileen L.. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
32.
KaplanGabriel E.2004. How Academic Ships Actually Navigate. In Governing Academia, ed. EhrenbergRonald G.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33.
KedarOritPhillips ShivelyW.. 2005. “Special Issue on Multilevel Modeling for Large Clusters.” Political Analysis13: 301–461.
34.
KeiserLael R.WilkinsVicky M.MeierKenneth J.HollandCatherine A.. 2002. “Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context, and Representative Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review96: 553–64.
35.
KezarAdriannaEckelPeter D.. 2004. “Meeting Today's Governance Challenges: A Synthesis of the Literature and Examination of a Future Agenda for Scholarship.” The Journal of Higher Education74: 371–99.
36.
KnottJack H.Abigail PayneA.. 2004. “The Impact of State Governance Structures on Management and Performance of Public Organizations: A Study of Higher Education Institutions.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management23: 13–30.
37.
LeslieDavid W.NovakRichard J.. 2003. “Substance Versus Politics: Through the Dark Mirror of Governance Reform.” Educational Policy17: 98–120.
38.
LevyDaniel C.1986. Higher Education and the State in Latin America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
39.
LewisDan A.MarunaShadd. 1999. The Politics of Education. In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, eds. GrayVirginiaHansonRussell L.JacobHerbert. 7th ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
40.
LowryRobert C.1997. “The Private Production of Public Goods: Organizational Maintenance, Managers' Objectives, and Collective Goals.” American Political Science Review91: 308–23.
41.
LowryRobert C.2001a. “Governmental Structure, Trustee Selection, and Public University Prices and Spending: Multiple Means to Similar Ends.” American Journal of Political Science45: 845–61.
42.
LowryRobert C.2001b. “The Effects of State Political Interests and Campus Outputs on Public University Revenues.” Economics of Education Review20: 105–19.
43.
LowryRobert C.2004. “Markets, Governance and University Priorities: Evidence on Undergraduate Education and Research.” Economics of Governance5: 29–51.
44.
LowryRobert C.2006. Incomplete Contracts and the Political Economy of the Privatized Research University. Presented at the State of the Art Conference on The Privatization of the Public Research University, Athens, GA.
45.
LyallKatharine C.SellKathleen R.. 2006. The True Genius of America at Risk: Are We Losing our Public Universities to De Facto Privatization?Westport, CT: Praeger.
46.
MacTaggert, Terrance J., & Associates.1998. Seeking Excellence through Independence: Liberating Colleges and Universities from Excessive Regulation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
47.
McCubbinsMatthew D.NollRoger G.WeingastBarry R.. 1989. “Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies.” Virginia Law Review75: 431–82.
48.
McGuinnessAims C.Jr., 1997. The Functions and Evolution of State Coordination and Governance in Postsecondary Education. State Postsecondary Education Structures Sourcebook. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
49.
McLendonMichael K.2003a. “Setting the Governmental Agenda for State Decentralization of Higher Education.” The Journal of Higher Education74: 479–515.
50.
McLendonMichael K.2003b. “The Politics of Higher Education: Toward an Expanded Research Agenda.” Educational Policy17: 165–91.
51.
McLendonMichael K.EddingsStuart. 2002. “Direct Democracy and Higher Education: The State Ballot as an Instrument of Higher Education Policy Making.” Educational Policy16: 193–218.
52.
McLendonMichael K.HellerDonald E.YoungSteven P.. 2005. “State Postsecondary Policy Innovation: Politics, Competition, and the Interstate Migration of Policy Ideas.” The Journal of Higher Education76: 363–400.
53.
McLendonMichael K.HearnJames C.DeatonRuss. 2006. “Called to Account: Analyzing the Origins and Spread of State Performance-Accountability Policies for Higher Education.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis28: 1–24.
54.
McPhersonMichael S.Owen SchapiroMorton. 1991. Keeping College Affordable. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
55.
MeierKenneth J.Gonzalez JuenkeEricWrinkleRobert D.Polinardand J.L.. 2005. “Structural Choices and Representational Biases: The Post-Election Color of Representation.” American Journal of Political Science49: 758–768.
56.
MintromMichael. 1997. “Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation.” American Journal of Political Science41: 738–70.
57.
MoeTerry. 1990. The Politics of Bureaucratic Structure. In Can the Government Govern? eds. ChubbJohnPetersonPaul. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
58.
NathansAaron. 2006. Lyall Urges Private Role in UW Control: Says ‘State-Agency Model’ Is Failing. The Capital Times (Madison, WI), 13 January, 3A.
Nicholson-CrottyJillMeierKenneth J.. 2003. “Politics, Structure, and Public Policy: The Case of Higher Education.” Educational Policy17: 80–97.
61.
Nicholson-CrottySeanTheobaldNick A.Dan WoodB.. 2006. “Fiscal Federalism and Budgetary Tradeoffs in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly: 59: 313–21.
62.
PayneA. Abigail. 2003a. “The Effects of Congressional Appropriation Committee Membership on the Distribution of Federal Research Funding to Universities.” Economic Inquiry41: 325–45.
63.
PayneA. Abigail. 2003b. “The Role of Politically Motivated Subsidies on University Research Activities.” Educational Policy17: 12–37.
64.
PetkofskyAndrew. 2005. University Autonomy Measure Approved,Richmond Times Dispatch, 31 March, B-1.
65.
PusserBrianTurnerSarah E.. 2004. Nonprofit and For-Profit Governance in Higher Education. In Governing Academia, ed. G EhrenbergRonald. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
66.
QuigleyJohn M.RubinfeldDaniel L.. 1993. Public Choices in Public Higher Education. In Studies of Supply and Demand in Higher Education, eds. ClotfelterCharles T.RothschildMichael.” Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
67.
RosenHarvey S.1992. Public Finance. 3rd ed.Homewood, IL: Irwin.
68.
RudolphFrederick. [1962] 1990. The American College & University: A History. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
69.
SabloffPaula L.1997. “Another Reason Why State Legislatures Will Continue to Restrict Public University Autonomy.” The Review of Higher Education20: 141–62.
70.
SalernoCarlo. 2004. “Public Money and Private Providers: Funding Channels and National Patterns in Four Countries.” Higher Education48: 101–30.
SavG. Thomas. 1986. “The Politics of Race in Higher Education: Governing Boards and Constituents.” Public Choice48: 147–55.
73.
ShleiferAndrei. 1998. “State versus Private Ownership.” Journal of Economic Perspectives12: 133–50.
74.
SteenbergenMarco R.JonesBradford S.. 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science46: 218–37.
75.
StrathmanJames G.1994. “Migration, Benefit Spillovers and State Support of Higher Education.” Urban Studies31: 913–20.
76.
TeskePaul. 2004. Regulation in the States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
77.
ThompsonFredZumetaWilliam. 2001. “Effects of Key State Policies on Private Colleges and Universities: Sustaining Private-Sector Capacity in the Face of the Higher Education Access Challenge.” Economics of Education Review20: 517–31.
78.
TomaEugenia Froedge. 1990. “Boards of Trustees, Agency Problems, and University Output.” Public Choice67: 1–9.
79.
VolkweinJames Fredericks. 1986. “Campus Autonomy and Its Relationship to Measures of University Quality.” Journal of Higher Education57: 510–28.
80.
VolkweinJames FredericksMalikShaukat M.. 1997. “State Regulation and Administrative Flexibility at Public Universities.” Research in Higher Education38: 17–42.
81.
WalkerJack L.Jr.1969. “The Diffusion of Innovation among the American States.” American Political Science Review63: 880–99.
82.
WaughWilliam L.Jr.2003. “Issues in University Governance: More ‘Professional’ and Less Academic.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science585: 84–96.
83.
WinstonGordon C.1999. “Subsidies, Hierarchy and Peers: The Awkward Economics of Higher Education.” Journal of Economic Perspectives13: 13–36.
84.
ZumetaWilliam. 1992. “State Policies and Private Higher Education.” Journal of Higher Education63: 363–417.
