Fiorina (1992, 1994) argued that increased professionalism of state legislatures in the 1970s and 1980s increased Democratic control of those bodies. While some subsequent empirical studies have been consistent with this hypothesis, doubt remains about the causal connection of this relationship. Our review of Fiorina's theoretical argument leads us to add legislative district size as a conditioning element to the model. Using data from state legislatures in 1960-98, we find that such a model supports the claim that the empirical connection between legislative professionalism and Democratic electoral success is causal and not spurious.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science42: 327–48.
2.
Council of State Governments. Various years. The Book of the States. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.
3.
DyeThomas R.1971. “State Legislative Politics.” In Politics in the American States, eds. JacobsHerbertVinesKenneth N.. 2nd ed.Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.
4.
FiorinaMorris P.1992. Divided Government. New York: Macmillan.
5.
FiorinaMorris P.1994. “Divided Government in the American States: A Byproduct of Legislative Professionalism.” American Political Science Review88: 304–16.
6.
FiorinaMorris P.1997. “Professionalism, Realignment, and Representation.” American Political Science Review91: 156–62.
7.
FiorinaMorris P.1999. “Further Evidence of the Partisan Consequences of Legislative Professionalism.” American Journal of Political Science43: 974–7.
8.
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. 1992. State Legislative Election Returns in the United States, 1968-1989. [computer file] (Study # 8907). Fifth ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1992.
9.
JacobsonGary C.1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946-1986.” American Political Science Review83: 773–93.
10.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.1980. Applied Regression. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-022. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
MeinkeScott R.HaseckeEdward B.. 2003. “Term Limits, Professionalization, and Partisan Control in U.S. State Legislatures.” Journal of Politics65: 898–908.
12.
StonecashJeffrey M.AgathangelouAnna M.. 1997. “Trends in the Partisan Composition of State Legislatures: A Response to Fiorina.” American Political Science Review91: 148–55.
13.
Van DunkEmily. 1997. “Challenger Quality in State Legislative Elections.” Political Research Quarterly50: 793–807.
