Electing members of legislatures through multimember districts (MMDs) reduces racial and ethnic minorities' descriptive representation in those bodies, but is their substantive representation also hurt? Do legislative MMDs lead to worse policy outcomes for minorities independent of their effect on legislative demographics? To address these questions, I examine welfare policy in the states from 1997 to 2000. I find evidence that suggests that states whose upper legislative chamber is comprised of MMDs have significantly less generous welfare policy. I conclude that MMDs do indeed damage the substantive representation of racial and ethnic minorities in legislatures, independent of their effect on descriptive representation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArceneauxKevin. 2001. “The “Gender Gap” in State Legislative Representation: New Data to Tackle an Old Question.” Political Research Quarterly54: 143–60.
2.
BarrilleauxCharlesHolbrookThomasLangerLaura. 2002. “Electoral Competition, Legislative Balance, and American State Welfare Policy.” American Journal of Political Science46: 415–27.
3.
BeckNathaniel. 2001. “Time-Series—Cross-Section Data: What Have We Learned in the Past Few Years?” Annual Review of Political Science4: 271–93.
4.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-1993.” American Journal of Political Science42: 327–48.
5.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 2002. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the United States” [computer file] (Study #1208). ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2002.
6.
BrattonKathleen A.2002. “The Effect of Legislative Diversity on Agenda Setting: Evidence from Six State Legislatures.” American Politics Research30: 115–42.
7.
BrattonKathleen A.HaynieKerry L.. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics61: 658–79.
BrownMichael K.1999. Race, Money, and the American Welfare State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
BrownRobert D.1995. “Party Cleavages and Welfare Effort in the American States.” American Political Science Review89: 23–33.
11.
DarcyRobertWelchSusanClarkJanet. 1985. “Women Candidates in Single and Multi-Member Districts.” Social Science Quarterly66: 945–53.
12.
DarcyRobertWelchSusanClarkJanet. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation. 2nd ed.Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
13.
Directory of African American Legislators, 1999-2000. Washington, DC: National Black Caucus of State Legislators.
14.
FeinsteinCharles H.ThomasMark. 2002. Making History Count: A Primer in Quantitative Methods for Historians. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
15.
FellowesMatthew C.RoweGretchen. 2004. “Politics and the New American Welfare States.” American Journal of Political Science48: 362–73.
16.
FinegoldKennethWeirAlan. 2002. Welfare Reform: The Next Act. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
17.
GerberElisabeth R.MortonRebecca A.RietzThomas A.. 1998. “Minority Representation in Multimember Districts.” American Political Science Review92: 127–44.
18.
GilensMartin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Anti-poverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
GreeneWilliam H.1997. Econometric Analysis. 3rd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
HammKeith E.MoncriefGary F.. 1999. “Legislative Politics in the States.” In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, eds. GrayVirginiaHansonRussell L.JacobHerbert. 7th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
21.
HoganRobert E.2001. “The Influence of State and District Conditions on the Representation of Women in State Legislatures.” American Politics Research29: 4–24.
22.
HoganRobert E.HammKeith E.. 1998. “The Cost of Representation in State Legislatures: Variations in District-Level Campaign Spending.” In Campaign Finance in State Legislative Elections, eds. ThompsonJoel A.MoncriefGary F.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
23.
JacobsonGary C.1992. The Politics of Congressional Elections. New York: Harper Collins.
24.
JewellMalcolm E.1982. Representation in State Legislatures. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
25.
KeyV.O.Jr.1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.
26.
KingJames D.2002. “Single-Member Districts and the Representation of Women in American State Legislatures: The Effects of Electoral System Change.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly2: 161–75.
27.
LiebermanRobert. 1998. Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
LublinDavid. 1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
MeadLawrence M.1997. The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
30.
MladenkaKenneth R.1989. “Blacks and Hispanics in Urban Policy.” American Political Science Review83: 165–92.
31.
MoncriefGary F.ThompsonJoel A.. 1992. “Electoral Structure and State Legislative Representation: A Research Note.” Journal of Politics54: 246–56.
The National Election Studies, Center for Political Studies, University of Michigan.2000. “The NES Guide to Public Opinion and Electoral Behavior.” Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer and distributor]. http://www.umich.edu/∼nes/nesguide/nesguide.htm (April 7, 2005).
34.
O'RourkeTimothy G.1998. “The Impact of Reapportionment on Congress and State Legislatures.” In Voting Rights and Redistricting in the United States, ed. RushMark E.. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
35.
PitkinHanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
36.
PivenFrances FoxClowardRichard A.. 1993. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Vintage Books.
37.
RichardsonLilliard E.Jr.CooperChristopher A.. 2003. “Descriptive Representation in Multi-Member District Legislatures, 1975-2002.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
38.
RichardsonLilliard E.Jr.RussellBrian E.CooperChristopher A.. 2004. “Legislative Representation in a Single-Member versus Multiple-Member District System: The Arizona State Legislature.” Political Research Quarterly57: 337–44.
39.
SmithMark. 1997. “The Nature of Party Governance: Connecting Conceptualization and Measurement.” American Journal of Political Science41: 1042–56.
40.
SossJoeSchramSanford F.VartanianThomas P.O'BrienErin. 2001. “Setting the Terms of Relief: Explaining State Policy Choices in the Devolution Revolution.” American Journal of Political Science45: 378–95.
SwainCarol. 1993. Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African-Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
TobinJames. 1958. “Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables.” Econometrica26: 24–36.
44.
TolbertCaroline. 2003. “Direct Democracy and Institutional Realignment in the American States.” Political Science Quarterly118: 467–89.
45.
United States Bureau of the Census.1997-2000. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce.
46.
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.2000. “State-by-State Welfare Caseloads since 1993.” http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/news/stats/caseload.htm (April 7, 2005).
WhitbyKenny J.2002. “Bill Sponsorship and Intraracial Voting among African American Representatives.” American Politics Research30: 93–109.
49.
WrightGerald C.EriksonRobert S.McIverJohn P.. 1987. “Public Opinion and Policy Liberalism in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science31: 980–1001.
