We use a survey of State House reporters to measure corruption in state government and assess the priority federal prosecutors place on corruption investigations. The reliability and validity of the corruption measures are assessed, as are the relationships among corruption level, federal prosecutorial effort, and the number of federal prosecutions. Federal corruption prosecutions are positively correlated with both corruption and prosecutorial effort. Hence, we argue that federal prosecution data provide a potentially biased and unreliable measure of state public corruption.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdesAlbertoTellaRafael Di. 1999. “Rents, Competition and Corruption.” American Economic Review89:982–93.
2.
AltJamesLassenDavid Dreyer. 2002. The Political Economy of Institutions and Corruption in American States. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society, San Diego, CA.
3.
AltJamesDreyer LassenDavidSkillingDavid. 2002. “Fiscal Transparency, Gubernatorial Popularity, and the Scale of Government: Evidence from the States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly2:230–50.
4.
ArmstrongJ. Scott. 1975. “Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly39:111–6.
5.
BrunettiAymoKisunkoGregoryWederBeatrice. 1997. Institutional Obstacles to Doing Business: Region-by-Region Results for a Worldwide Survey of the Private Sector.World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1759. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
6.
Bureau of Justice Statistics.2000. National Corrections Reporting Program,1997. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.
7.
CronbachL. J.1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.” Psychometrika2:151–60.
8.
DillmanDon A.1972. “Increasing Mail Questionnaire Responses for Large Samples of the General Public.” Public Opinion Quarterly35:254–7.
9.
DillmanDon A.1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley and Sons.
10.
DillmanDon A.1983. Mail and Self-Administered Surveys. In Handbook of Survey Studies, eds. RossiPeter H.WrightJames D.AndersonAndy B.. New York: Academic Press.
11.
DillmanDon A.1991. “The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys.” Annual Review of Sociology17:225–49.
12.
DillmanDon A.ChristensonJames A.CarpenterEdwin H.BrooksRalph M.. 1974. “Increasing Mail Questionnaire Response: A Four-State Comparison.” American Sociological Review39:744–56.
13.
DillmanDon A.FreyJames H.. 1974. “Contribution of Personalization to Mail Questionnaire Response as an Element of a Previously Tested Method.” Journal of Applied Psychology59:297–301.
14.
FismanRaymondGattiRoberta. 2002. “Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence across Countries.” Journal of Public Economics83:325–45.
15.
FoxRichard J.CraskMelvin R.KimJonghoon. 1988. “Mail Survey Response Rate: A Meta-Analysis of Selected Techniques for Inducing Response.” Public Opinion Quarterly52:467–91.
16.
GoelRajeev K.NelsonMichael A.. 1998. “Corruption and Government Size: A Disaggregated Analysis.” Public Choice97:107–20.
17.
GrembowskiDavid. 1985. Survey Questionnaire Salience (Letter).American Journal of Public Health75:1350.
18.
HeberleinThomas A.BaumgartnerRobert. 1978. “Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Comprehensive Literature Review.” American Sociological Review43:447–62.
19.
JamesJeanine H.BolsteinRichard. 1992. “Large Monetary Incentives and Their Effect on Mail Survey Response Rates.” Public Opinion Quarterly56:442–53.
20.
JohnsonSimonKaufmannDanielZoido-LobatonPablo. 1998. “Regulatory Discretion and the Unofficial Economy.” American Economic Review88:387–92.
21.
KrysanMariaSchumanHowardJo ScottLesliBeattyPaul. 1994. “Response Rates and Response Content in Mail versus Face-to-Face Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly58:381–99.
22.
MauroPaolo. 1995. “Corruption and Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics110:681–712.
23.
MauroPaolo. 1998. “Corruption and the Composition of Government Expenditure.” Journal of Public Economics69:263–79.
24.
MeierKenneth J.HolbrookThomas. 1992. “I Seen My Opportunities and I Took 'em: Political Corruption in the American States.” Journal of Politics54:135–55.
Omnigraphics, Inc.1997. Government Phone Book USA. 5th ed.Detroit, MI: Omnigraphics, Inc.
27.
PetersJohn G.WelchSusan. 1978. “Politics, Corruption and Political Culture: A View from the State Legislature.” American Politics Quarterly6: 345–56.
28.
Public Integrity Section.1991. Report to Congress on the Activities and Operations of the Public Integrity Section for1990. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.
29.
SchlesingerThomasMeierKenneth J.. 2002. The Targeting of Political Corruption in the United States. In Political Corruption, eds. HeidenheimerArnoldJohnston.Michael3rd ed.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
30.
ScottChristopher. 1961. “Research on Mail Surveys.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A124:144–205.
31.
SRDS Media Solutions.1998a. SRDS Radio Advertising Source. Des Plaines, IL: SRDS Media Solutions.
32.
SRDS Media Solutions.1998b. SRDS TV & Cable Source. Des Plaines, IL: SRDS Media Solutions.
33.
TreismanDaniel. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Public Economics76:399–457.
