Are the politics of welfare policy for the “deserving” and “undeserving” poor the same? We use pooled cross-sectional time-series analyses of state government discretionary welfare spending on general assistance (GA) and Supplemental Security Income supplements (SSI-S) to address this question. We find that efforts to assist the GA population decline as electoral competition increases while efforts to assist the SSI-S population increase, providing evidence that only the deserving poor are favored by heightened political competition. We also find that SSI-S benefits rise with ideological liberalism, electoral competition, and the percentage of African Americans in a state. When considered in light of the negative effect of larger African American populations on states' SSI-S efforts, this suggests targeting of particular groups. Finally, we find that SSI-S enrollments are reduced, but the per-recipient payments are increased under state administration, suggesting that state administrators are more likely to provide more services to existing clientele than to expand their client base.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchenChristopher. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of CA.
2.
AlbrittonRobert B.1989. “Impacts of Federal Financial Incentives on State Welfare Policy-Making and Interstate Equity.” Publius19:127–41.
3.
AltJames E.LowryRobert C.. 1994. “Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States.” American Political Science Review88:811–28.
4.
BarrilleauxCharles. 1998. The Politics of State Health and Welfare Reforms. In Governing Partners: State-Local Relations in the U.S., ed. HansonR.. Boulder, CO: Westview.
5.
BarrilleauxCharlesHolbrookThomasLangerLaura. 2002. “Electoral Competition, Legislative Balance, and American State Welfare Policy.” American Journal of Political Science46:415–27.
6.
BeckNathanielKatzJonathan N.. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review89:634–47.
7.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States,1960–93.”American Journal of Political Science42:337–48.
8.
BerryWilliam D.FordingRichardHansonRussell. 2000. “An Annual Cost of Living Index for the American States,1960–1995.”Journal of Politics62:550–67.
9.
BrownRobert D.1995. “Party Cleavages and Welfare Effort in the American States.” American Political Science Review89:23–33.
10.
Council of State Governments. Various years. The Book of the States. Lexington, KY: CSG.
11.
DayChristine L.1990. What Older Americans Think. Princeton, NJ: Princeton.
12.
DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
DyeThomas R.1966. Politics, Economics and the Public. Chicago: Rand McNally.
15.
Epsing-AndersonGosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.Jr.McIverJohn P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
FordingRichard. 2001. “The Political Response to Black Insurgency: A Critical Test of Competing Theories of the Role of the State.” American Political Science Review95:115–30.
18.
GallagherJerome L.UccelloCori E.PierceAlicia B.ReidyErin B.. 1999. State General Assistance Programs,1998: Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
19.
GoodinRobertHeadeyBruceMuffelsRuudDirvenHenk-Jan. 1999. The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GarandJames C.1985. “Partisan Change and Shifting Expenditure Priorities in the American States,1945–1978.”American Politics Quarterly13:355–91.
GroganColleen M.1994. “Politico-Economic Factors Influencing State Medicaid Policy.” Political Research Quarterly47:589–623.
23.
HeckmanJames. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica47:153–61.
24.
HeroRodney E.TolbertCaroline J.. 1996. “A Racial/Ethnic Diversity Interpretation of Politics and Policy in the States of the U.S.” American Journal of Political Science40:851–71.
25.
HillKim Q.LeighleyJan E.Hinton-AnderssonAngela. 1995. “Lower-Class Mobilization and Policy Linkage in the U.S. States.” American Journal of Political Science39:75–86.
26.
HolbrookThomasDunkEmily Van. 1993. “Electoral Competition in the American States.” American Political Science Review87:955–62.
27.
KeiserLael R.2001. “Street-Level Bureaucrats, Administrative Power and the Manipulation of Federal Social Security Disability Programs.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly1:144–64.
28.
KeiserLael R.SossJoe. 1998. “With Good Cause: Bureaucratic Discretion and the Politics of Child Support Enforcement.” American Journal of Political Science42:1133–56.
29.
KeyV.O.Jr.1949. Southern Politics. New York: Knopf.
30.
MaddalaG.S.1983. Limited-dependent and Qualitative Dependent Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge.
31.
NiskanenWilliam. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine.
32.
PlotnickRobert D.WintersRichard F.. 1985. “A Politico-Economic Theory of Income Redistribution.” American Political Science Review79:458–73.
33.
RichBennett M.BaumMartha. 1985. The Aging: A Guide to Public Policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
34.
QuadagnoJill S.1994. The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
RingquistEvanHillKim Q.LeighleyJan E.Hinton-Anderssonand A.. 1997. “Lower-Class Mobilization and Policy Linkage in the U.S. States: A Correction.” American Journal of Political Science41:339–44.
36.
RobertsonDavid. 1976. A Theory of Party Competition. London: J. Wiley.
37.
SchneiderAnneIngramHelen. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review87:334–47.
38.
Social Security Administration.1996. Social Security Green Book. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (USGPO).
39.
Social Security Administration.1998. Social Security Facts. http://www.ssa.gov/.
40.
Social Security Administration.1999a. Social Security Facts. http://www.ssa.gov/.
41.
Social Security Administration.1999b. Social Security Bulletin: Annual Statistical Supplement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
42.
Social Security Administration. Various years-a. Social Security Bulletin: Annual Statistical Supplement. Washington, DC: USGPO.
43.
Social Security Administration. Various years-b. State Assistance Programs for SSI Recipients. Washington, DC: USGPO.
44.
SossJoe. 1999. “Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action.” American Political Science Review93:363–80.
45.
SossJoeSchramSanford F.VartanianThomas P.O'BrienErin. 2001. “Setting the Terms of Relief: Explaining State Policy Choices in the Devolution Revolution.” American Journal of Political Science45:378–95.
46.
StoneDeborah A.1984. The Disabled State. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
47.
TobinJames. 1958. “Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables.” Econometrica26:24–36.
48.
U.S. Department of Commerce. Various years. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: USGPO.
49.
VoldenCraig. 2002. “The Politics of Competitive Federalism: A Race to the Bottom in Welfare Benefits?” American Journal of Political Science46:352–63.
