The connection between the government and the governed is often evaluated using election results. This article explores this connection between elections using data on gubernatorial approval in the states. Specifically, I ask the question, Do governors with greater job approval ratings have greater influence over the state bureaucracy than governors with lower approval ratings? Measures of both gubernatorial influence and administrator contact with gubernatorial staff are regressed on gubernatorial approval ratings from state polling data, along with controls for other state characteristics. The results show that approval does affect a governor's influence with the bureaucracy, and as such, serves as an additional connection between the government and the governed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbneyGlennLauthThomas P.. 1984. The Politics of State and City Administration. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
2.
AtkesonLonna RaePartinRandall W.. 1995. “Economic and Referendum Voting: A Comparison of Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review89:99–107.
3.
BarrilleauxCharles. 1999. “Governors, Bureaus, and State Policymaking.” State and Local Government Review31:53–9.
4.
BeckNathanielKatzJonathan N.. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review89:634–47.
5.
BeyleThad. 1999. The Governors. In Politics in the American States, eds. GrayVirginiaHansonRussell L.Jacob.Herbert7th ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
6.
BeyleThadNiemiRichard G.SigelmanLee. 2002. “Gubernatorial, Senatorial, and State-Level Presidential Job Approval: The U.S. Officials Job Approval Ratings (JAR) Collection.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly2:215–29.
7.
BracePaulHinckleyBarbara. 1991. “The Structure of Presidential Approval: Constraints within and across Presidencies.” Journal of Politics53:993–1017.
8.
BracePaulWardDaniel S.. 1999. The Institutionalized Legislature and the Rise of the Antipolitics Era. In American State and Local Politics: Direction for the 21st Century, eds. WeberRonald E.Brace.PaulNew York: Chatham House/Seven Bridges Press.
9.
CarseyThomas M.2000. Campaign Dynamics: The Race for Governor. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
10.
DometriusNelson C.1999. Governors: Their Heritage and Future. In American State and Local Politics: Direction for the 21st Century, eds. WeberRonald E.Brace.PaulNew York: Chatham House/Seven Bridges Press.
11.
DometriusNelson C.2001. Institutional Changes and Gubernatorial Influence over State Administrative Structures. Presented at the combined Research Conference on Gubernatorial, Senatorial, and Presidential Approval and the Conference on the Study of Politics in the American States, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
EllingRichard. 1992. Public Management in the States. Westport, CT: Praeger.
14.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGeraldMcIverJohn. 1989. “Partisan Elections, Public Opinion and State Policy.” American Political Science Review83:729–50.
15.
EriksonRobert S.WrightGeraldMcIverJohn. 1993. Statehouse Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FiskeSusan T.1993. Cognitive Theory and the Presidency. In Researching the Presidency: Vital Questions, New Approaches, eds. EdwardsGeorge C.IIIKesselJohn H.RockmanBert A.. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
17.
GoodsellCharles T.1994. The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic. 3rd ed.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
18.
HowellSusan E.VanderleeuwJames M.. 1990. “Economic Effects on State Governors.” American Politics Quarterly18:158–68.
19.
HummelRalph P.1994. The Bureaucratic Experience. 4th ed.New York: St. Martin's.
20.
KingJames D.2000. “Changes in Professionalism in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly25:327–59.
21.
KingJames D.2001. “Incumbent Popularity and Vote Choice in Gubernatorial Elections.” Journal of Politics63:585–97.
22.
KingdonJohn W.1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
23.
MacDonaldJason A.SigelmanLee. 1999. “Public Assessment of Gubernatorial Performance: A Comparative State Analysis.” American Politics Quarterly27:201–15.
24.
McIverJohn P.EriksonRobert S.WrightGerald C.. 2001. Public Opinion and Public Policy in Temporal Perspective: A View from the States. Presented at the Conference on the Study of Politics in the American States, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
25.
NiemiRichard G.StanleyHarold W.VogelRonald J.. 1995. “State Economies and State Taxes: Do Voters Hold Governors Accountable?” American Journal of Political Science39:936–57.
26.
NiskanenWilliam. A.Jr.1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine.
27.
SabatoLarry. 1978. Goodbye to Good-time Charlie: The American Governor Transformed,1950–1975. Lexington, MA: DC Heath and Co.
28.
SchlesingerJoseph A.1966. Ambition and Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally.
29.
SigelmanLee. 1986. “The Bureaucrat as Budget Maximizer: An Assumption Examined.” Public Budgeting and Finance6:50–9.
30.
SigelmanLeeDometriusNelson C.. 1988. “Governors as Chief Administrators: The Linkage between Formal Powers and Informal Influence.” American Politics Quarterly16:157–70.
31.
SigelmanLeeSmithRoland. 1981. “Personal, Office, and State Characteristics as Predictors of Gubernatorial Performance.” Journal of Politics43:169–80.
32.
SimonHerbert A.1945. Administrative Behavior: A Study of the Decision Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Macmillan.
33.
StimsonJames. 1985. “Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay.” American Journal of Political Science29:914–47.
34.
WoodB. Dan. 1988. “Principals, Bureaucrats, and Responsiveness in Clear Air Enforcements.” American Political Science Review82:213–34.
35.
WoodB. Dan. 1990. “Does Politics Make a Difference at the EEOC?” American Journal of Political Science34:503–30.
36.
WoodB. DanWatermanRichard W.. 1991. “The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy.” American Political Science Review85:801–28.
37.
WoodB. DanWatermanRichard W.. 1993. “The Dynamics of Political-Bureaucratic Adaptation.” American Journal of Political Science37:497–528.
38.
WoodB. DanWatermanRichard W.. 1994. Bureaucratic Dynamics: The Role of Bureaucracy in a Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
39.
WrightDeil S.1988. Understanding Intergovernmental Relations. 3rd ed.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
40.
WrightDeil S.1996. Information and introductory materials on ASAP (American State Administrators Project), 1964–1994. Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Photocopy.
