This study assesses the effects of changing electoral structure on the representation of women in American state legislatures. Specifically, how does converting from multimember districts (MMDs) to single-member districts (SMDs) affect the proportion of women serving in the state legislature? I use a quasi-experimental design, comparing election results from the four states that eliminated MMDs during the reapportionment following the 1990 census to those in eight states whose systems did not change during this period. The weight of the evidence suggests that abandoning MMDs for SMDs decreases the representation of women in state legislatures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonKristi. 1975. “Working Women and Political Participation, 1952–1972.” American Journal of Political Science19:439–53.
2.
ArceneauxKevin. 2001. “The “Gender Gap” in State Legislative Representation: New Data to Tackle an Old Question.” Political Research Quarterly54:143–60.
3.
BerkmanMichael B.1994. “State Legislators in Congress: Strategic Politicians, Professional Legislatures, and the Party Nexus.” American Journal of Politics Science38:1025–55.
4.
BeyleThad. 1999. The Governors. In Politics in the American States, ed. GrayVirginiaHansonRussell L.Jacob.Herbert7th ed.Washington, DC: CQ Press.
5.
BrattonKathleen A.HaynieKerry L.. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics61:658–79.
6.
BullockCharles S.GaddieRonald Keith. 1993. “Changing from Multimember to Single-Member Districts: Partisan, Racial, and Gender Consequences.” State and Local Government Review25:155–63.
7.
CampbellDonald T.1969. “Reforms as Experiments.” American Psychologist24:409–29.
8.
CampbellDonald T.StanleyJulian C.. 1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
CarrollSusan J.1989. “The Personal Is Political: The Intersection of Private Lives and Public Roles among Women and Men in Elective and Appointive Office.” Women and Politics9:51–67.
10.
CarrollSusan J.1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. 2nd ed.Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
11.
Center for the American Woman and Politics. Various years.Fact Sheet: Women in State Legislatures. New Brunswick, NJ: Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
12.
Center for the American Woman and Politics.2001. Fact Sheet: Women in Elective Office 2001. New Brunswick, NJ: Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
13.
ClarkJanet. 1991. “Getting There: Women in Public Office.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science515:63–76.
14.
ClarkJanetDarcyR.WelchSusanAmbrosiusMargery. 1984. Women As Candidates in Six States. In Political Women: Current Roles in State and Local Government, ed. FlammangJanet. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
15.
CookThomas D.CampbellDonald T.. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation Design and Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing.
16.
DarcyR.HadleyCharles D.KirkseyJason F.. 1993. “Election Systems and the Representation of Black Women in American State Legislatures.” Women and Politics13(2):73–89.
17.
DarcyR.WelchSusanClarkJanet. 1985. “Women Candidates in Single- and Multi-Member Districts: American State Legislative Races.” Social Science Quarterly66:945–53.
18.
DarcyR.WelchSusanClarkJanet. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation. 2nd ed.Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
19.
DiamondIrene. 1977. Sex Roles in the State House. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
FrancisWayne L.KennyLawrence W.. 1997. “Equilibrium Projections of the Consequences of Term Limits upon Expected Tenure, Institutional Turnover, and Membership Experience.” Journal of Politics59:240–52.
21.
GrofmanBernardHandleyLisa. 1991. “The Impact of the Voting Rights Act on Black Representation in Southern State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly16:111–28.
22.
HardyRichard J.NewcomerKathryn E.. 1981. “The Impact of Reapportionment on Policy Expenditures.” Law and Policy Quarterly3:464–84.
23.
HibbsDouglas A.Jr.1974. Problems of Statistical Estimation and Causal Inference in Time-Series Regression Models. In Sociological Methodology 1973–1974, ed. CostnerHerbert L.. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
24.
HillDavid B.1981. “Political Culture and Female Political Representation.” Journal of Politics43:159–68.
25.
HoganRobert E.2001. “The Influence of State and District Conditions on the Representation of Women in U.S. State Legislatures.” American Politics Research29:4–24.
26.
KingJames D.WambeamRodney A.. 1995/1996. “Impact of Election Day Registration on Voter Turnout: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis.” Policy Studies Review14:263–78.
27.
KirkpatrickJeane J.1974. Political women. New York: Basic Books.
28.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.1986. Interrupted Time Series. In New Tools for Social Scientists: Advances and Applications in Research Methods, eds. BerryWilliam D.Lewis-BeckMichael S.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
MatlandRichard E.BrownDeborah Dwight. 1992. “District Magnitude's Effect on Female Representation in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17:469–92.
30.
MeierKenneth J.1980. “Executive Reorganization of Government: Impact on Employment and Expenditures.” American Journal of Political Science24:396–412.
31.
MeierKenneth J.BrudneyJeffrey L.. 1993. Applied Statistics for Public Administration. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
32.
MoncriefGary F.ThompsonJoel A.. 1992. “Electoral Structure and State Legislative Representation: A Research Note.” Journal of Politics54:246–56.
33.
MoncriefGary F.ThompsonJoel A.HaddonMichaelHoyerRobert. 1992. “For Whom the Bell Tolls: Term Limits and State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17:37–47.
34.
MorganDavid R.PelisseroJohn. 1980. “Urban Policy: Does Political Structure Matter?” American Political Science Review74:999–1006.
35.
NechemiasCarol. 1987. “Changes in the Election of Women to U.S. State Legislative Seats.” Legislative Studies Quarterly12:125–42.
36.
NewcomerKathryn E.HardyRichard J.. 1981. Quasi-Experimental Time-Series Designs in Policy-Impact Analysis. In The Analysis of Policy Impact, eds. GrummJohn G.WasbyStephen J.. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
37.
NiemiRichard G.HillJeffrey S.GrofmanBernard. 1985. “The Impact of Multimember Districts on Party Representation in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly10:441–55.
38.
OpheimCynthia. 1994. “The Effect of U.S. State Legislative Term Limits Revisited.” Legislative Studies Quarterly19:49–59.
39.
PritchardAnita. 1992. “Changes in Electoral Structures and the Success of Women Candidates: The Case of Florida.” Social Science Quarterly73:62–70.
40.
ReingoldBeth. 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
41.
Reynolds v. Sims. 1964. 377 U.S. 533.
42.
RuleWilma. 1990. “Why More Women Are State Legislators: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly43:437–48.
43.
RuleWilma. 1992. Multimember Legislative Districts: Minority and Anglo Women's and Men's Recruitment Opportunity. In United States Electoral Systems: Their Impact on Women and Minorities, eds. ZimmermanWilma Rule and Joseph F.. New York: Greenwood Press.
44.
Saint-GermainMichelle A.1989. “Does Their Difference Make a Difference? The Impact of Women on Public Policy in the Arizona Legislature.” Social Science Quarterly70:956–68.
45.
SquirePeverill. 1992. “Legislative Professionalism and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17:69–79.
46.
ThomasSue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
ThompsonJoel A.MoncriefGary F.. 1993. “The Implications of Term Limits for Women and Minorities: Some Evidence from the States.” Social Science Quarterly74:300–9.
48.
VandenboschSue. 1996. “A Negative Relationship between Religion and the Percentage of Women State Legislators in the United States.” Journal of Legislative Studies2:322–38.
49.
WelchSusanStudlarDonley T.. 1990. “Multi-Member Districts and the Representation of Women: Evidence from Britain and the United States.” Journal of Politics52:391–412.
