Elite interviews have long been a staple of state politics research. Improved information technology facilitates the use of elite interviews, but also underscores the need for attending to their design, operationalization, and analysis. This essay provides a framework for developing, conducting, and interpreting elite interviews, and suggests means to enhance the validity and reliability of findings by considering instrumentation, sampling, data collection, and transcript analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeamerGlenn. 1999. Creative Politics: Taxes and Public Goods in a Federal System. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
2.
BiernackiPatrickWaldorfDan. 1981. “Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling.” Sociological Methods and Research2(10):141–63.
3.
CarminesEdward G.ZellerRichard A.. 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
4.
CookThomas D.CampbellDonald T.. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
5.
DeanJohn P.WhyteWilliam Foote. 1970. How Do You Know if the Informant is Telling the Truth? In Elite and Specialized Interviewing, ed. DexterLewis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
6.
DexterLewis Anthony, ed. 1970. Elite and Specialized Interviewing. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
7.
DionDouglas. 1998. “Evidence and Inference in the Comparative Case Study.” Comparative Politics30:127–46.
8.
FennoRichard F.Jr.1986. “Observation, Context, and Sequence in the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review80:3–16.
9.
HenryGary. 1990. Practical Sampling. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications.
10.
JewellMalcolm E.1982. Representation in State Legislatures. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
11.
JewellMalcolm E.WhickerMarcia Lynn. 1994. Legislative Leadership in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
12.
JuddCharles M.SmithEliot R.KidderLouise H.. 1991. Research Methods in Social Relations. 6th ed.Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
13.
KingGaryKeohaneRobert O.VerbaSidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
KingdonJohn W.1989. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. 3rd ed.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
15.
LoeppDaniel. 1999. Sharing the Balance of Power: An Examination of Shared Power in the Michigan House of Representatives, 1993–94. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
16.
MorehouseSarah McCally. 1998. The Governor As Party Leader: Campaigning and Governing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
17.
PattonMichael Quinn. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications.
18.
ReeherGrant. 1996. Narratives of Justice: Legislators' Beliefs about Distributive Fairness. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
19.
SchneiderAnneIngramHelen. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Policy.” American Political Science Review87:334–47.
20.
SeidmanIrving. 1998. Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
21.
WahlkeJohn C.EulauHeinzBuchananWilliamFergusonLeRoy C.. 1962. The Legislative System. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
