Term limit laws for state legislators now exist in 19 states. While these laws were passed as early as 1990, they have only recently actually forced legislators from office. Prior to the 2000 elections, only two states (California and Maine) had experienced virtually complete legislative turnover in at least one chamber as a result of term limits. Nine other states have had at least one cohort of legislators forced out of office. Now that a significant portion of these legislative bodies has been replaced by term limits, we can begin to examine the consequences of this reform. We report findings from a survey of lobbyists in five term-limits states. We find strong consensus among these lobbyists that term limits have caused the state political influence structure to shift away from the legislature and toward the governor, administrative agencies, and interest groups. With regard to the impact on internal operations and procedures of the legislature, we discover considerable variation across states, variation that, in part, is related to legislative professionalism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllebaughDalenePinneyNeil. 2000. Term Limits at Any Cost? A Comparative Study of Competition and Campaign Expenditures. Presented at the Coping with Term Limits Conference, Columbus, OH.
2.
BenjaminGeraldMalbinMichael, eds. 1992. Limiting Legislative Terms. Washington DC: CQ Press.
3.
BracePaulWardDaniel. 1999. The Institutionalized Legislature and the Rise of the Anti-Politics Era. In American State and Local Politics, eds. WeberRonaldBrace.PaulChatham, NJ: Chatham House.
4.
BrunelleJim. 1997. The Reign in Maine.State Legislatures, September.
5.
CainBruce. 1996. The Varying Impact of Term Limits on Legislator Behavior and Electoral Responsiveness. In Legislative Term Limits: Public Choice Perspectives, ed. GrofmanBernard. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6.
CainBruceLevinand M.. 1999. “Term Limits.” Annual Review of Political Science. 2:163–88.
7.
CaressStanley. 1999. “The Influence of Term Limits on the Electoral Success of Women.” Women & Politics20:45–63.
8.
CareyJohnNiemiRichardPowellLynda. 1998. “The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly23:271–300.
9.
CareyJohnNeimiRichardPowellLinda. 2000. Term Limits in the State Legislature. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
10.
CarollSusanJenkinsKrista. 1999. The Effect of Term Limits on the Representation of Women: An Analysis of Evidence from the 1998 Elections. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics, Eagleton Institute, Rutgers University.
11.
ChiKeonLeatherbyDrew. 1998. State Legislative Term Limits. In Solutions: Policy Options for State Decision-Makers. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.
12.
ClinesFrancis. 2000. Term Limits Bring Wholesale Change into Legislatures.The New York Times. 14 February.
13.
ClucasRichard. 2000. California: The New Amateur Politics. Presented at the Coping with Term Limits Conference, Columbus, OH.
14.
FundJohn. 1992. Term Limitation: An Idea Whose Time Has Come. In Limiting Legislative Terms, eds. BenjaminGeraldMalbin.MichaelWashington, DC: CQ Press.
15.
GrofmanBernard, ed. 1996. Legislative Term Limits: Public Choice Perspectives. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16.
HansenKaren. 1997. Term Limits for Better or Worse.State Legislatures, July/August.
17.
KatchesMark. 1999. No More Museum Pieces.State Legislatures. February.
18.
KousserThad. 2000. Term Limits and Legislator Performance. Presented at the Coping with Term Limits Conference, Columbus, OH.
19.
KurtzKarl. 1992. Understanding the Diversity of American Legislatures.Legislative Studies Section Newsletter. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
MalbinMichaelBenjaminGerald. 1992. Legislatures after Term Limits. In Limiting Legislative Terms, eds. BenjaminGeraldMalbin.MichaelWashington, DC: CQ Press.
22.
MilbankDana. 1997. As Term Limits Take Effect in Maine's Capitol, Government Seems to Be Doing Just Fine.The Wall Street Journal, 2 April.
23.
MoncriefGary F.ThompsonJoel A.HaddonMichaelHoyerRobert. 1992. “For Whom the Bell Tolls: Term Limits and State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17:37–47.
24.
MooneyChristopher Z.1995. “Citizens, Structures, and Sister States: Influences on State Legislative Professionalism.” Legislative Studies Quarterly20:47–67.
25.
National Conference of State Legislatures.1997. Time Enough? States Respond to Term Limits. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund.
26.
OpheimCynthia. 1994. “The Effect of U.S. State Legislative Terms Revisited.” Legislative Studies Quarterly19:49–59.
27.
PetraccaMark. 1996. A Legislature in Transition: The California Experience with Term Limits. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.
28.
QuinnTony. 1997. Term Limits Haven't Produced Results Backers, Foes Expected.Sacramento Bee, 23 March.
29.
RixDalene. 1999. Term Limits and Their Impact on Gender Equality in State Legislatures. Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, GA.
30.
RosenthalAlan. 1998. The Decline of Representative Democracy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
31.
SquirePeverill. 1992. “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly17:69–79.
32.
SquirePeverill. 2000. “Uncontested Seats in State Legislative Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly25:131–46.
33.
ThompsonJoel A.MoncriefGary. 2000. Lobbying Under Limits. Presented at the
