The surveys of Senate races from 1988 to 1992 conducted by the American National Election Study include a number of issue questions that can be aggregated to measure state public opinion. A simple-to-compute coefficient is used to judge the aggregated reliability of these measures. A comparison of these state public opinion measures on specific issues to more general indicators, such as state ideology and partisanship, demonstrates their usefulness in obtaining a richer depiction of public preferences for studies of state politics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramowitzAlan I.SaundersKyle L.. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics60: 634–52.
2.
BerryWilliam D.RingquistEvan J.FordingRichard C.HansonRussell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American Sates, 1960–93.” American Journal of Political Science42: 327–48.
3.
ElazarDaniel J.1966. American Federalism: A View from the States. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
4.
GroganColleen M.1994. “Political-Economic Factors Influencing State Medicaid Policy.” Political Research Quarterly47: 589–623.
5.
Holbrook-ProvowThomas M.PoeStephen C.. 1987. “Measuring State Political Ideology.” American Politics Quarterly15: 399–416.
6.
JonesBradford S.NorranderBarbara. 1996. “The Reliability of Aggregated Public Opinion Measures.” American Journal of Political Science40: 295–309.
7.
MillerWarren E.KinderDonald R.RosenstoneSteven J., and the National Election Studies. 1999. American National Election Study: Pooled Senate Election Study, 1988, 1990, 1992 (Computer file). 3rd version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 1999. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
8.
NorranderBarbara. 1989. “Explaining Cross-State Variation in Independents.” American Journal of Political Science33: 516–36.
9.
NorranderBarbaraWilcoxClyde. 1999. “Public Opinion and Policymaking in the States: The Case of Post-Roe Abortion Policy.” Policy Studies Journal27: 707–22.
10.
O'BrienRobert M.1990. “Estimating the Reliability of Aggregate-Level Variables Based on Individual-Level Characteristics.” Sociological Methods and Research18: 473–504.
11.
SharkanskyIra. 1969. “The Utility of Elazar's Political Culture.” Polity2: 66–83.
12.
SmithTom W.1982. “House Effects and the Reproducibility of Survey Measurements: A Comparison of the 1980 GSS and the 1980 American National Election Study.” Public Opinion Quarterly46: 54–68.
13.
TaggartWilliam A.WinnRussell G.. 1993. “Imprisonment in the American States.” Social Science Quarterly74: 736–49.
14.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.1996. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1996. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
15.
WeberRonald E.HopkinsAnne H.MezeyMichael L.MungerFrank J.. 1972–73. “Computer Simulation of State Electorates.” Public Opinion Quarterly36: 549–65.
16.
WrightGerald C.Jr.EriksonRobert S.McIverJohn P.. 1985. “Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology with Survey Data.” Journal of Politics47: 469–89.
