Bandyk DF, Schmitt DD, Seabrook GR, Adams MB, Towne JBMonitoring functional patency of in situ saphenous vein bypasses: The impact of a surveillance protocol and elective revision. J Vasc Surg9:284-296, 1989.
3.
Sladen JG, Reid JDS, Cooperberg PLColor flow duplex screening of infrainguinal grafts combining low- and high-velocity criteria. Am J Surg158:107-112, 1989.
4.
Mills JL, Harris EJ, Taylor LM, Beckett WCThe importance of routine surveillance of distal bypass grafts with duplex scanning. A study of 379 reversed vein grafts. J Vasc Surg12:379-389, 1990.
Moody AP, Gould DA, Harris PLVein graft surveillance improves patency in femoropopliteal bypass . Eur J Vasc Surg4:117-121, 1990.
8.
Idu MM, Blankenstein JD, de Gier P., Truyen E., Buth J.Impact of a color-flow duplex surveillance program on infrainguinal vein graft patency. A five-year experience. J Vasc Surg17:42-53, 1993.
9.
Mattos MA, van Bemmelen PS, Hodgson KJ, Ramsey DE, Barkmeier LD, Sumner DSDoes correction of stenoses identified with color duplex scanning improve infrainguinal graft patency?J Vasc Surg17:54-66, 1993.
10.
Bandyk DF, Kaebnick HW, Bergamini TM, Moldenhauer P., Towne JBHemodynamics of in situ saphenous vein arterial bypass. Arch Surg123:477-482, 1988.
Belkin M., Mackey WC, McLaughlin R., Umphrey SE, O'Donnell TFThe variation in vein graft flow velocity with luminal diameter and outflow level. J Vasc Surg15:991-999, 1992.
13.
Bandyk DF, Bergamini TM, Towne JB, Schmitt DD, Seabrook GRDurability of vein graft revision: The outcome of secondary procedures . J Vasc Surg13:200-210, 1991.