Von Reuten GM, Ortega-Schrkamp E., Spillner S.Is noninvasive Doppler sonography alone sufficient to indicate carotid surgery?Presented at the Ninth Salzburg Conference . Salzburg: 1979.
Sandmann W., Hennerici M., Nullen H., Aulich A., Knab K., Kremer K.Carotid artery surgery without angiography: Risk or progress. In Greenhalgh RM, Rose FC , eds. Progress in Stroke Research II. London: Pitman, 1983, pp 447-461.
Crew JR, Dean M., Johnson JM, et al. Carotid surgery without angiography. Am J Surg148: 217-220, 1984.
6.
Thomas GI, Jones TW, Stavney LS, et al. Carotid endarterectomy after Doppler ultrasonographic examination without angiography. Am J Surg151:616-619, 1986.
7.
Ricotta JR, Holen J., Schenk E., et al. Is routine angiography necessary prior to carotid endarterectomy ? J Vasc Surg1:96-102, 1984.
8.
Walsh J., Markowitz I., Kerstein MDCarotid endarterectomy for amaurosis fugax without angiography. Am J Surg142:174, 1986.
9.
Goodson SF, Flanigan DP, Bishara RA, et al. Can carotid duplex scanning supplant arteriography in patients with focal carotid territory symptoms? J Vasc Surg5:551-557, 1987.
10.
Marshall WG , Kouchoukos NT, Murphy SF, Pelate C., et al. Carotid endarterectomy based on duplex scanning without preoperative arteriography . Circulation78(Suppl I):I-1-I-5, 1988.
11.
Moore WS, Ziomek S., Quiñones-Baldrich WJ, et al. Can clinical evaluation and noninvasive testing substitute for arteriography in the evaluation of carotid artery disease? Ann Surg208: 91-94, 1988.
12.
Familo RW, Scott DJA, Cole SEA, Jeans WD, Horrocks M.Role of duplex scanning in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy . Br J Surg77:388-390, 1990.
13.
Geuder JW, Lamparello PJ, Riles TS, et al. Is duplex scanning sufficient evaluation before carotid endarterectomy ? J Vasc Surg9:193-201, 1989.
14.
Hill JC, Carbonneau K., Prabhaker KB, Akers DL, Bell WH, Kerstein MD, et al. Safe extracranial vascular evaluation and surgery without preoperative arteriography. Ann Vasc Surg4:34-38, 1990.
15.
Wagner WH, Cohen JL, Cossman DV, et al. The changing role of angiography for carotid surgery. Presented at the Fourth Annual Meeting of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. Rome: Sept. 20-21, 1990.
16.
Hessel SJ, Adams DF, Abrams HLComplications of angiography. Radiology138:273-281, 1981.
17.
Rose JSContrast media, complications, and preparation of the patient. In Rutherford RB, ed. Vascular Surgery . Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1984, pp 244-252.
18.
Mani RLComplications of catheter cerebral angiography: Analysis of 5,000 procedures. I. Criteria and incidence. Am J Roentgenol131:861-865, 1978.
19.
Martin-Paredero V., Dixon SM, Baker JD, et al. Risk of renal failure after major angiography. Arch Surg118:1417-1420, 1983 .
20.
Gomes AS, Lois JF, Baker JD, et al. Acute renal dysfunction in high-risk patients after angiography: Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media. Radiology170:65-68, 1989.
21.
Bornstein NM , Beloev ZG, Norris JWThe limitations of diagnosis of carotid occlusion by Doppler ultrasound. Ann Surg207:315-317, 1988.
22.
Roederer GO, Langlois YE, Chan AR, et al. Is siphon disease important in predicting outcome of carotid endarterectomy? Arch Surg118:1177-1181, 1983.
23.
Borozan PG, Schuler JJ, LaRosa MP, et al. The natural history of isolated carotid siphon stenosis. J Vasc Surg1:744-749, 1984.
24.
Schuler JJ, Flanigan DP, Lim LT, et al. The effect of carotid siphon stenosis on stroke rate, death, and relief of symptoms following elective carotid endarterectomy. Surgery92: 1058-1067, 1982 .
25.
Moore WSDoes tandem lesion mean tandem risk in patients with carotid artery disease ? J Vasc Surg7:454-455, 1988.
26.
Akers DL, Bell WH, Kerstein MDDoes intracranial dye study contribute to evaluation of carotid artery disease?Am J Surg156:87-90, 1988.
27.
Akers DL, Markowitz IA, Kerstein MDThe value of aortic arch study in the evaluation of cerebrovascular insufficiency . Am J Surg154:220-223, 1987.