Brewster DC, Geller SC, Kaufman JA, Cambria RP, Gertler JP, LaMuraglia GM, et al. Initial experience with endovascular aneurysm repair: comparison of early results with outcome of conventional open repair. J Vasc Surg. Jun1998;27(6):992-1003.
2.
Chuter TA, Reilly LM, Faruqi RM, Kerlan RB, Sawhney R., Wall SD, et al. Endovascular aneurysm repair in high-risk patients. J Vasc Surg Jan2000;31(1Pt.1):122-133.
3.
Lee WA, Carter JW, Upchurch G., Seeger JM, Huber TS, et al. Perioperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States during 2001. J Vasc Surs Mar2004; 39(3):491-496.
4.
May J., White GH, YuW,Ly CN, Waugh R.,Stephen MS, et al. Concurrent comparison of endoluminal versus open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: analysis of 303 patients by life table method. J Vasc Surg Feb1998;27(2):213-220.
5.
Torella F.Effect of improved endograft design on outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair . J Vasc Surg2004;40:216-221.
6.
Laheij RJF , Buth J., Harris PL, Moll FL, Stelter WJ, Verhoeven ELNeed for secondary interventions after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: intermediate-term follow-up results of a European collaborative registry (EUROSTAR). Br J Surg2000; 87(12):1666-1673.
7.
May J., White GH, Waugh R., Petrasek P., Chaufour X., Arulchelvam M., et al. Life-table analysis of primary and assisted success following endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms; the role of supplementary endovascular intervention in improving outcome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2000;19(6):648-655.
8.
Clair D., Ouriel K.Pivotal trial update. Endovascular Today2002 :28-34.
