Davies AH, Hawdon AJ, Sydes MR, Thompson SG, and VGST Participants. Is duplex surveillance of value after leg vein bypass grafting? Principal results of the Vein Graft Surveillance Randomized Trial (VGST).
Davies AH, Hawdon AJ, Sydes MR, Thompson SG, and VGST Participants. Is duplex surveillance of value after leg vein bypass grafting? Principal results of the vein graft surveillance randomized trial (VGST). Circulation.2005;112: 1985-1991.
2.
Szilagyi DE, Elliot JP, Smith RF, et al.Biologic fate of autogenous vein implants as arterial substitutes. Ann Surg.1973;110: 485-493.
3.
Mills JL, Bandyk DF, Gahtan V, Esses GE.The origin of infrainguinal vein graft stenosis: a prospective study based on duplex surveillance. J Vasc Surg.1995;21: 16-25.
4.
Green RM, McNamara J, Ouriel K, et al.Comparison of infrainguinal surveillance techniques. J Vasc Surg.1990; 11: 207-215.
5.
Idu MM, Blankenstein JD, de Gier P, Truyen E, Buth J.Impact of a color-flow duplex surveillance program on infrainguinal vein graft patency: a five-year experience. J Vasc Surg.1993;17: 42-53.
6.
Mattos MA, van Bemmelen PS, Hodgson KJ, et al.Does correction of stenoses identified with color duplex scanning improve infrainguinal graft patency? J Vasc Surg. 1993;17: 54-66.
7.
Erickson CA, Towne JB, Seabrook GR, Freischlag JA, Cambria R.Ongoing vascular laboratory surveillance is essential to maximize long term in situ saphenous bypass patency. J Vasc Surg.1996;23: 18-27.
8.
Ihnat DM, Mills JL, Dawson, DL, et al.The correlation of early flow disturbances with the development of infrainguinal graft stenosis: a 10-year study of 341 autogenous vein grafts. J Vasc Surg.1999;30: 8-15.
9.
Ferris BL, Mills JL, Hughes JD, Durrani T, Knox R.Is early postoperative duplex scan surveillance of leg bypass graft clinically important? J Vasc Surg. 2003; 37: 495-500.
10.
Mills JL, Wixon CL, James DC, Devine J, Westerband A, Hughes JD.The natural history of intermediate and critical vein graft stenosis: recommendations for continued surveillance or repair. J Vasc Surg.2001;33: 273-280.
11.
Bandyk DF, Cato RF, Towne JB.A low flow velocity predicts failure of femoropopliteal and femorotibial bypass grafts. Surgery.1985;98: 799-809.
Graor RA, Risius B, Younter JR, et al.Thrombolysis of peripheral arterial bypass grafts: surgical thrombectomy compared with thrombolysis: a preliminary report. J Vasc Surg.1988;7: 347-355.
14.
Belkin M, Donaldson MC, Whittemore AD, et al.Observations on the use of thrombolytic agents for thrombotic occlusion of infrainguinal grafts. J Vasc Surg.1990;11: 289-296.
15.
Grigg MJ, Nicolaides AN, Wolfe JH.Detection and grading of femoro-distal vein graft stenosis: duplex velocity measurements compared with angiography. J Vasc Surg.1988;8: 661-666.
16.
Sladen JG, Reid JDS, Cooperberg PL, et al.Color flow duplex screening of infrainguinal grafts combining low- and high-velocity criteria. Am J Surg.1989;158: 107-112.
17.
Papanicolaou G, Zierler RE, Beach KW, et al.Hemodynamic parameters of failing infrainguinal bypass grafts. Am J Surg.1995;169: 238-244.
18.
Gahtan V, Payne LP, Roper LD, et al.Duplex criteria for predicting progression of vein graft lesions: which stenoses can be safely followed? J Vasc Technology. 1995; 19: 211-215.
19.
Olojuba DH, McCarthy MJ, Naylor AR, Bell PRF, London NJM.At what peak velocity ratio value should duplex-detected infrainguinal vein graft stenoses be revised? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998;15: 258-260.
20.
Capps MT, Cantwell-Gab K, Bergelin RO, Strandness DE.Vein graft lesions: time of onset and rate of progression. J Vasc Surg.1995;22: 466-475.
21.
Mills JL.The impact of duplex surveillance on infrainguinal vein bypass surgery. Adv Vasc Surg.1996;4: 201-210.
22.
Mills JL.P values may lack power: the choice of conduit for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass graft. J Vasc Surg.2000;32: 402-405.
23.
Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, et al.Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. Br J Cancer.1976;34: 585-612.
