Pulmonary emboli, a potentially lethal venous thromboembolic complication, is a potentially preventable morbidity or mortality that surgeons should consider in the perioperative period or in high-risk patients. Prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement offers a high protection rate against fatal pulmonary emboli. This manuscript discusses the indications for filter placement, different types of currently available IVC filters, and problems and complications of filter placement and vena cava filters. Optional or retrievable IVC filters are also discussed. Overall, individual patient's clinical risks and benefits should be considered before vena cava filter placement. The new generation of optional filters may offer clinicians a new option of temporal risk reduction without the long-term complications that can be associated with permanent IVC filters.
1. Bick RL: Hereditary and acquired thrombophilia. Part I. Preface. Semin Thromb Hemost25:251-253, 1999.
2.
2. Langan III EM, Miller RS, Casey III WJ, et al: Prophylactic inferior vena cava filters in trauma patients at high risk: follow-up examination and risk/benefit assessment. J Vasc Surg30:484-490, 1999.
3.
3. Velmahos GC, Kern J, Chan LS, et al: Prevention of venous thromboembolism after injury: anevidencebased report-part II: analysis of risk factors and evaluation of the role of vena caval filters. J Trauma49:140-144, 2000.
4.
4. Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, et al: A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deepvein thrombosis. N Eng J Med338:409-415, 1998.
5.
5. Greenfield LJ, Michna BA: Twelve-year clinical experience with the Greenfield vena caval filter. Surgery104:706-712, 1988.
9. Duperier T, Mosenthal A, Swan KG, et al: Acute complications associated with Greenfield filter insertion in high-risk trauma patients. J Trauma54:545-549, 2003.
10.
10. Rogers FB, Shackford SR, Wilson J, et al: Prophylactic vena cava filter insertion in severely injured trauma patients: indications and preliminary results. J Trauma35:637-642, 1993.
11.
11. Wojcik R, Cipolle MD, Fearen I, et al: Long-term follow-up of trauma patients with a vena caval filter. J Trauma49:839-843, 2000.
12.
12. Ascher E, Hingorani A, Tsemekhin B, et al: Lessons learned from a 6-year clinical experience with superior vena cava Greenfield filters. J Vasc Surg32:881-887, 2000.
13.
13. Aburahma AF, Mullins DA: Endovascular caval interruption in pregnant patients with deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity. J Vasc Surg33:375-378, 2001.
14.
14. Mobin-Uddin K, McLean R, Bolooki H, et al: Caval interruption for prevention of pulmonary embolism. Long-term results of a new method. Arch Surg99: 711-715, 1969.
15.
15. Greenfield LJ, McCurdy JR, Brown PP, et al: A new intracaval filter permitting continued flow and resolution of emboli. Surgery73:599-606, 1973.
16.
16. Schutzer R, Ascher E, Hingorani A, et al: Preliminary results of the new 6F TrapEase inferior vena cava filter. Ann Vasc Surg17:103-106, 2003.
17.
17. Greenfield LJ, Cho KJ, Pais SO, et al: Preliminary clinical experience with the titanium Greenfield vena caval filter. Arch Surg124:657-659, 1989.
18.
18. Wojtowycz MM, Stoehr T, Crummy AB, et al: The Bird's Nest inferior vena caval filter: review of a single-center experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol8:171-179, 1997.
19.
19. Simon M, Athanasoulis CA, Kim D, et al: Simon nitinol inferior vena cava filter: initial clinical experience. Work in progress. Radiology172:99-103, 1989.
20.
20. Engmann E, Asch MR: Clinical experience with the antecubital Simon nitinol IVC filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol9:774-778, 1998.
21.
21. Stavropoulos SW, Clark T, Jacobs D, et al: Placement of a vena cava filter with an antecubital approach. Acad Radiol9:478-481, 2002.
22.
22. Lorch H, Welger D, Wagner V, et al: Current practice of temporary vena cava filter insertion: a multicenter registry. J Vasc Interv Radiol11:83-88, 2000.
23.
23. Carcone B, Pernes JM, Carcopino JM, et al: Worsening of proximal thrombosis after insertion of a temporary caval filter (3 cases). Rev Med Interne16:351-353, 1995.
24.
24. Stosslein F, Altmann E: A rare complication with an Antheor vena cava filter. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol21:165-167, 1998.
25.
25. Millward SF, Oliva VL, Bell SD, et al: Gunther Tulip retrievable vena cava filter: results from the Registry of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol12:1053-1058, 2001.
26.
26. Rossi A, Arata FM, Bonaiuti P, et al: Fatal outcome in atrial migration of the Tempofilter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol22:227-231, 1999.
27.
27. Neuerburg J, Gunther RW, Rassmussen E, et al: New retrievable percutaneous vena cava filter: experimental in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol16:224-229, 1993.
28.
28. Yamagami T, Kato T, Iida S, et al: Retrievable vena cava filter placement during treatment for deep venous thrombosis. Br J Radiol76:712-718, 2003.
29.
29. Asch MR: Initial experience in humans with a new retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Radiology225:835-844, 2002.
30.
30. Matsumura JS, Morasch MD: Filter placement by ultrasound technique at the bedside. Semin Vasc Surg13:199-203, 2000.
34. Hirsch SB, Harrington EB, Miller CM, et al: Accidental placement of the Greenfield filter in the heart: report of two cases. J Vasc Surg6:609-610, 1987.
35.
35. Poletti PA, Becker CD, Prina L, et al: Long-term results of the Simon nitinol inferior vena cava filter. Eur Radiol8:289-294, 1998.
36.
36. Blebea J, Wilson R, Waybill P, et al: Deep venous thrombosis after percutaneous insertion of vena caval filters. J Vasc Surg30:821-829, 1999.
37.
37. Grassi CJ, Bettmann MA, Rogoff P, et al: Femoral arteriovenous fistula after placement of a Kimray-Greenfield filter. Am J Roentgenol151:681-682, 1988.
38.
38. Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC: Recurrent thromboembolism in patients with vena cava filters. J Vasc Surg33:510-514, 2001.
39.
39. Hawkins SP, al-Kutoubi A: The Simon nitinol inferior vena cava filter: preliminaiy experience in the UK. Clin Radiol46:378-380, 1992.
40.
40. Kim D, Edelman RR, Margolin CJ, et al: The Simon nitinol filter: evaluation by MR and ultrasound. Angiology43:541-548, 1992.
41.
41. Grassi CJ, Matsumoto AH, Teitelbaum GP: Vena caval occlusion after Simon nitinol filter placement: identification with MR imaging in patients with malignancy. J Vasc Interv Radiol3:535-539, 1992.
42.
42. Mohan CR, Hoballah JJ, Sharp WJ, et al: Comparative efficacy and complications of vena caval filters. J Vasc Surg21:235-246, 1995.
43.
43. Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC: Twenty-year clinical experience with the Greenfield filter. Cardiovasc Surg3:199-205, 1995.
44.
44. Joshi A, Carr J, Chrisman H, et al: Filter-related, thrombotic occlusion of the inferior vena cava treated with a Gianturco stent. J Vasc Interv Radiol14:381-385, 2003.
45.
45. Ray CE Jr, Kaufman JA: Complications of inferior vena cava filters. Abdom Imaging. 1996;21:368-374.
46.
46. Athanasoulis CA, Kaufman JA, Halpern EF, et al: Inferior vena caval filters: review of a 26-year singlecenter clinical experience. Radiology216:54-66, 2000.
47.
47. Woodward EB, Farber A, Wagner WH, et al: Delayed retroperitoneal arterial hemorrhage after inferior vena cava (IVC) filter insertion: case report and literature review of caval perforations by IVC filters. Ann Vasc Surg16:193-196, 2002.
48.
48. Howerton RM, Watkins M, Feldman L: Late arterial hemorrhage secondary to a Greenfield filter requiring operative intervention. Surgery109:265-268, 1991.
50. Kurgan A, Nunnelee JD, Auer AI: Penetration of the wall of an abdominal aortic aneurysm by a Greenfield filter prong: a late complication. J Vasc Surg18:303-306, 1993.
51.
51. Dabbagh A, Chakfe N, Kretz JG, et al: Late complication of a Greenfield filter associating caudal migration and perforation of the abdominal aorta by a ruptured strut. J Vasc Surg. 22:182-187, 1995.
52.
52. Goldman HB, Hanna K, Dmochowski RR: Ureteral injury secondary to an inferior vena caval filter. J Urol156:1763-1763, 1996.
53.
53. Flanagan D, Creasy T, Chataway F, et al: Caval umrbrella causing obstructive uropathy. Postgrad Med J72:235-237, 1996.
54.
54. Sarkar MR, Lemminger FM: An unusual cause of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage-perforation of a vena cava filter into the duodenum. Vasa26:305-307. 1997.
55.
55. Bianchini AU, Mehta SN, Mulder DS, et al: Duodenal perforation by a Greenfield filter: endoscopic diagnosis. Am J Gastroenterol92:686-687, 1997.
56.
56. al Zahrani HA: Bird's Nest inferior vena caval filter migration into the duodenum: a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Endovasc Surg2:372-375, 1995.
57.
57. Gelbfish GA, Ascer E: Intracardiac and intrapulmonary Greenfield filters: a long-term follow-up. J Vasc Surg14:614-617, 1991.
58.
58. James KV, Sobolewski AP, Lohr JM, et al: Tricuspid insufficiency after intracardiac migration of a Greenfield filter: case report and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg24:494-498, 1996.
59.
59. Millward SF, Peterson RA, Moher D, et al: LGM (Vena Tech) vena caval filter: experience at a single institution. J Vasc Interv Radiol5:351-356, 1994.
