Abstract
Objective:
To examine which patients have relied most heavily on audio-only versus video or in-person visits to attend psychiatric care since the COVID-19 pandemic at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs).
Methods:
This observational study reviewed electronic health record data from all patients who attended psychiatric care at a large FQHC from January 2020 to December 2023. Patient sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, preferred language) were extracted from the electronic health record, as was psychiatry visit information. Patients were categorized according to whether a majority of their psychiatry visits during the assessment period were attended by audio-only, video, or in-person.
Results:
Among the 9,569 patients who received psychiatric care during the assessment period, 48% (n = 4,563) attended most of their psychiatry visits by audio-only compared with 37% (n = 3,534) who attended most visits by video and 15% (n = 1,472) who attended most visits in-person. Relative risk (log-binomial) regression analyses identified patient age, sex, and language as consistent correlates of audio-only psychiatry visits. For example, patients who preferred to receive their care in Spanish were 12% (95% confidence interval: 0%, 25%) more likely to attend most psychiatry visits by audio-only versus video compared with those who preferred English. The effect of patient race/ethnicity on audio-only psychiatry visits was more variable and less precise.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates that audio-only modalities are the most popular means for attending psychiatric care among FQHC patients and reaffirms the importance of audio-only modalities for attending psychiatric care among underserved populations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
