Field hospitals (FHs) are vital in responding to natural disasters, pandemics, and conflicts. Yet, challenges such as delayed deployment, limited resources, and a narrow focus on trauma care often hinder their impact. This study examines how integrating telemedicine can enhance FH operations and adapt health care delivery to evolving disaster contexts.
Methods:
Drawing on a structured literature review and expert input, two conceptual models are proposed to map health care needs over time and the role of telemedicine.
Results:
In sudden-onset disasters, telemedicine aids early trauma care, addresses rising non-trauma needs during recovery, and supports continuity of care post-deployment. In slow-onset crises, such as prolonged conflicts or epidemics, telemedicine plays an even more central role in maintaining routine and elective services as systems weaken.
Conclusions:
The findings underscore telemedicine’s ability to extend clinical reach, reduce reliance on physical infrastructure, and offer scalable support in emergencies. It bridges critical care gaps beyond the operational timeline of FHs. Although challenges in trust and implementation persist, strategic use of telemedicine can greatly improve the flexibility and effectiveness of disaster medical response. This study advocates a paradigm shift in FH planning, positioning telemedicine as a core component of both disaster medicine response and long-term recovery.
BremerR. Policy development in disaster preparedness and management: Lessons learned from the January 2001 earthquake in Gujarat, India. Prehosp Disaster Med, 2003; 18(4):372–384.
2.
SchultzCH, KoenigKL, NojiEK. A medical disaster response to reduce immediate mortality after an earthquake. N Engl J Med, 1996; 334(7):438–444.
3.
von SchreebJ, RiddezL, SamnegårdH, et al.Foreign field hospitals in the recent sudden-onset disasters in Iran, Haiti, Indonesia, and Pakistan. Prehosp Disaster Med, 2008; 23(2):144–151.
4.
MoradianMJ, ArdalanA, NejatiA, et al.Importance of site selection for stockpiling field hospitals for upcoming disasters. Bull Emerg Trauma, 2016; 4(3):124–125.
5.
World Health Organization–Pan American Health Organization. WHO/PAHO Guidelines for Use of Foreign Field Hospitals in the Aftermath of Sudden-Impact Disasters. 2003. [cited 2014 May]. Available from: http://www.paho.org/english/dd/ped/FieldHospitalsFolleto.pdf
6.
BurnweitC, StylianosS. Disaster response in a pediatric field hospital: Lessons learned in Haiti. J Pediatr Surg, 2011; 46(6):1131–1139.
7.
CamachoNA, KarkiK, SubediS, et al.International emergency medical teams in the aftermath of the 2015 Nepal earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med, 2019; 34(3):260–264.
8.
JamalA, HussainS, ZafarA, et al.Role of telemedicine during disaster: A case Study. In: 2007 9th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Application and Services. IEEE; 2007; pp. 261–263.
9.
GulzariA, TarakciH. A healthcare location-allocation model with an application of telemedicine for an earthquake response phase. Int J Disaster Risk Reduc, 2021; 55:102100.
10.
LatifiR, TilleyEH. Telemedicine for disaster management: Can it transform chaos into an organized, structured care from the distance? Am J Disaster Med, 2014; 9(1):25–37.
11.
BashshurRL, ReardonTG, ShannonGW. Telemedicine: A new health care delivery system. Annu Rev Public Health, 2000; 21(1):613–637.
12.
GarshnekV, BurkleFM. Applications of telemedicine and telecommunications to disaster medicine: Historical and future perspectives. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 1999; 6(1):26–37.
13.
KumarAH, KuruvillaJ, ThomasV. Maximising patient care: The crucial role of clinical pharmacists in virtual hospital and telehealth settings: A. Ind J Pharm Pract, 2025; 18(3):262–265.
14.
ChitungoI, MhangoM, MbungeE, et al.Utility of telemedicine in sub‐Saharan Africa during the COVID‐19 pandemic. A rapid review. Hum Behav Emerg Technol, 2021; 3(5):843–853.
15.
HjelmNM. Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare, 2005; 11(2):60–70.
16.
SnoswellCL, TaylorML, ComansTA, et al.Determining if telehealth can reduce health system costs: Scoping review. J Med Internet Res, 2020; 22(10):e17298.
17.
LitvakM, MillerK, BoyleT, et al.Telemedicine use in disasters: A scoping review. Disaster Med Public Health Prep, 2022; 16(2):791–800.
18.
Bar-OnE, VivanteA, DaganD, et al.The national Israeli field hospital in Ukraine: Innovative adaptation to a unique scenario. J Glob Health, 2022; 12:03078.
19.
MerrellRC, ConeSW, RafiqA. Telemedicine in extreme conditions: Disasters, war, remote sites. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2008; 131:99–116.
20.
AjamiS, LamoochiP. Use of telemedicine in disaster and remote places. J Educ Health Promot, 2014; 3(1):26.
21.
AhmadF, WysockiRW, FernandezJJ, et al.Patient perspectives on telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hand (N Y), 2023; 18(3):522–526.
22.
Lokmic-TomkinsZ, BhandariD, BainC, et al.Lessons learned from natural disasters around digital health technologies and delivering quality healthcare. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2023; 20(5):4542.
23.
PasipanodyaEC, ShemK. Provision of care through telemedicine during a natural disaster: A case study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases, 2020; 6(1):60.
24.
Der-MartirosianC, ChuK, DobalianA. Use of telehealth to improve access to care at the United States department of Veterans affairs during the 2017 Atlantic hurricane season. Disaster Med Public Health Prep, 2020; 17:e6.
25.
DoarnCR, LatifiR, PoropatichRK, et al.Development and validation of telemedicine for disaster response: The North Atlantic Treaty Organization multinational system. Telemed J E Health, 2018; 24(9):657–668.
26.
Anonymous. Policy Statements Approved January 2024. Ann Emerg Med, 2024; 83(6):e45–e49; doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.02.003
27.
DelaigueS, BonnardotL, SteichenO, et al.Seven years of telemedicine in Médecins Sans Frontières demonstrate that offering direct specialist expertise in the frontline brings clinical and educational value. J Gob Health, 2018; 8(2):020414.
28.
SaadiA, MateenFJ. International issues: Teleneurology in humanitarian crises: Lessons from the Médecins Sans Frontières experience. Neurology, 2017; 89(3):e16–e19.
29.
SpijkerS, AndronikouS, KosackC, et al.Quality assessment of X-rays interpreted via teleradiology for Médecins Sans Frontières. J Telemed Telecare, 2014; 20(2):82–88.
30.
ZachariahR, BienvenueB, AyadaL, et al.Practicing medicine without borders: Tele‐consultations and tele‐mentoring for improving paediatric care in a conflict setting in Somalia? Trop Med Int Health, 2012; 17(9):1156–1162.
31.
HaltonJ, KosackC, SpijkerS, et al.Teleradiology usage and user satisfaction with the telemedicine system operated by Médecins Sans Frontières. Front Public Health, 2014; 2:202.
XiongW, BairA, SandrockC, et al.Implementing telemedicine in medical emergency response: Concept of operation for a regional telemedicine hub. J Med Syst, 2012; 36(3):1651–1660.
34.
AgastyaWD. Disaster medicine in low-resource settings: Recent challenges and innovations. Medicosphere: J Diverse Med Res, 2024; 1(1):36–47.
35.
LatifiR, DoarnCR, ZoicasC, et al.Telemedicine for disaster management: Opportunities, challenges, and requirements. A Multinational Telemedicine Systems for Disaster Response: Opportunities and Challenges, 2017:112–129.
36.
EhrlichAI, KobrinskyBA, PetlakhVI, et al.Telemedicine for a children’s field hospital in Chechnya. J Telemed Telecare, 2007; 13(1):4–6.
37.
ScheidLP, LamDM, ThömmesLA, et al.Telemicrobiology: A novel telemedicine capability for mission support in the field of infectious medicine. Telemed J E Health, 2007; 13(2):108–117.
38.
FriedmanRS, CarpenterDM, ShaverJM, et al.Telemedicine familiarity and post-disaster utilization of emergency and hospital services for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Am J Prev Med, 2022; 63(1):e1–e9.
39.
GareayaghiA, TatlıdilE, ŞişmanE, et al.Post-Earthquake PTSD and the role of telepsychiatry: A six-month follow-up study after the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes. Medicina (Kaunas), 2025; 61(6):1097.
40.
AlserK, MallahSI, El-OunYR, et al.Trauma care supported through a global telemedicine initiative during the 2023–24 military assault on the Gaza Strip, occupied Palestinian territory: A case series. Lancet, 2024; 404(10455):874–886.
