To identify and analyze factors influencing the appropriateness of virtual and in-person care and to synthesize current evidence-based recommendations to assist health care providers in determining when virtual or in-person care is most suitable.
Methods
: Four databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and APA PsychInfo) and Google Scholar were searched to identify qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies and clinical practice guidelines published between January 2014 and January 2024 focused on appropriateness of virtual care. Articles were extracted and uploaded to Covidence for screening. Two researchers screened the articles independently, and a third researcher resolved any conflicts. Data were extracted from articles, and factors influencing the appropriateness of virtual care were categorized using thematic analysis.
Results
: The search retrieved 5,136 articles, of which 75 met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. An additional eight articles were identified following a supplemental search of reference lists, resulting in a total of 83 articles included in the study. Six primary concepts influencing the appropriateness of virtual care were identified from the literature (patient characteristics, clinical presentation and disease, timepoint in the care process, burden of care, provider factors, and technology platform) and 22 subconcepts. A flowchart incorporating these concepts was developed to assist in clinical decision-making regarding the suitability of virtual and in-person care.
Discussion
: Findings from this systematic review provide clinicians with a structured approach to evaluating the suitability of virtual versus in-person care, supporting evidence-based decisions and effective integration of virtual care into the health care system.
ShawJ, JamiesonT, AgarwalP, et al.Virtual care policy recommendations for patient-centred primary care: Findings of a consensus policy dialogue using a nominal group technique. J Telemed Telecare, 2018; 24(9):608–615; doi: 10.1177/1357633X17730444
2.
QianM, JiangJ. COVID-19 and social distancing. Z Gesundh Wiss, 2022; 30(1):259–261; doi: 10.1007/s10389-020-01321-z
3.
ContrerasCM, MetzgerGA, BeaneJD, et al.Telemedicine: Patient-provider clinical engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. J Gastrointest Surg, 2020; 24(7):1692–1697; doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04623-5
4.
SegalJB, DavisS, DukhaninV. Working framework for appropriate use of virtual care in primary care. J Am Board Fam Med, 2022; 35(3):629–633; doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.210469
5.
HynieM, JaimesA, OdaA, et al.Assessing virtual mental health access for refugees during the COVID-19 pandemic using the Levesque client-centered framework: What have we learned and how will we plan for the future? Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022; 19(9):5001; doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095001
Robertson-PreidlerJ, Biller-AndornoN, JohnsonTJ. What is appropriate care? An integrative review of emerging themes in the literature. BMC Health Serv Res, 2017; 17(1):452; doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2357-2
8.
ChassinMR, GalvinR. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA, 1998; 280(11):1000–1005; doi: 10.1001/jama.280.11.1000
9.
ShorrAF, MicekST, WelchEC, et al.Inappropriate antibiotic therapy in Gram-negative sepsis increases hospital length of stay. Crit Care Med, 2011; 39(1):46–51; doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181fa41a7
10.
LiewTM, LeeCS, GohSKL, et al.The prevalence and impact of potentially inappropriate prescribing among older persons in primary care settings: Multilevel meta-analysis. Age Ageing, 2020; 49(4):570–579; doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa057
11.
HeiderD, MatschingerH, MeidAD, et al.The impact of potentially inappropriate medication on the development of health care costs and its moderation by the number of prescribed substances. Results of a retrospective matched cohort study. PLoS One, 2018; 13(7):e0198004; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198004
12.
PageMJ, McKenzieJE, BossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 2021; 372:n71; doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
BraunV, ClarkeV. Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. Int J Transgend Health, 2023; 24(1):1–6; doi: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
16.
ManganJM, WoodruffRS, WinstonCA, et al.Recommendations for use of video directly observed therapy during tuberculosis treatment — United States, 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2023; 72(12):313–316; doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7212a4
17.
SalbachNM, MountainA, LindsayMP, et al.; Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations Advisory Committee, in collaboration with the Canadian Stroke Consortium and the Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2022; 101(11):1076–1082; doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002062
18.
SelickA, DurbinJ, HamdaniY, et al.Accessibility of virtual primary care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic: Qualitative study. JMIR Form Res, 2022; 6(8):e38916; doi: 10.2196/38916
19.
TurveyC, ColemanM, DennisonO, et al.ATA practice guidelines for video-based online mental health services. Telemed J E Health, 2013; 19(9):722–730; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.9989
20.
MengG, McAineyC, PerlmanCM, et al.Service process factors affecting patients’ and clinicians’ experiences on rapid teleconsultation implementation in out-patient neurology services during COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res, 2022; 22(1):534; doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07908-4
21.
GrayC, WrayC, TisdaleR, et al.Factors influencing how providers assess the appropriateness of video visits: Interview study with primary and specialty health care providers. J Med Internet Res, 2022; 24(8):e38826; doi: 10.2196/38826
22.
ChuenVL, DholakiaS, KalraS, et al.Geriatric care physicians’ perspectives on providing virtual care: A reflexive thematic synthesis of their online survey responses from Ontario, Canada. Age Ageing, 2024; 53(1); doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad231
23.
CharalambousJ, HollingdrakeO, CurrieJ. Nurse practitioner led telehealth services: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs, 2024; 33(3):839–858; doi: 10.1111/jocn.16898
24.
MichelA, MintonL, SullivanC, et al.Integrating mobile and portable technologies with in-person and telehealth care to increase perinatal healthcare equity for the unstably housed. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs, 2023; 37(1):27–35; doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000705
25.
BoothG, ZalaS, MitchellC, et al.The patient acceptability of a remotely delivered pain management programme for people with persistent musculoskeletal pain: A qualitative evaluation. Br J Pain, 2022; 16(6):581–592; doi: 10.1177/20494637221106411
26.
RajM, IottB, AnthonyD, et al.Family caregivers’ experiences with telehealth during COVID-19: Insights from Michigan. Ann Fam Med, 2022; 20(1):69–71; doi: 10.1370/afm.2760
27.
MyersK, NelsonEL, RabinowitzT, et al.American Telemedicine Association practice guidelines for telemental health with children and adolescents. Telemed J E Health, 2017; 23(10):779–804; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0177
28.
BilderRM, PostalKS, BarisaM, et al.Inter Organizational Practice Committee recommendations/guidance for teleneuropsychology in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 2020; 35(6):647–659; doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa046
29.
WongKYK, StafylisC, KlausnerJD. Telemedicine: A solution to disparities in human immunodeficiency virus prevention and pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake, and a framework to scalability and equity. Mhealth, 2020; 6:21; doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2019.12.06
30.
DoanBT, YangYB, RomanchychE, et al.From pandemic to progression: An educational framework for the implementation of virtual mental healthcare for children and youth as a response to COVID-19. J Contemp Psychother, 2021; 51(1):1–7; doi: 10.1007/s10879-020-09478-0
PalesyD, ForrestG, CrowleyME. Education guidelines, frameworks and resources for building virtual care capacity: An integrative review. J Telemed Telecare, 2023; 29(3):222–243; doi: 10.1177/1357633X221149230
33.
DemaerschalkBM, HollanderJE, KrupinskiE, et al.Quality frameworks for virtual care: Expert panel recommendations. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes, 2023; 7(1):31–44; doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.12.001
34.
ChimonasS, Lipitz-SnydermanA, SpiegelhoffZ, et al.Persistence of telemedicine usage for breast and prostate cancer after the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Cancers (Basel), 2023; 15(20):4961; doi: 10.3390/cancers15204961
35.
McKoyK, AntoniottiNM, ArmstrongA, et al.Practice guidelines for teledermatology. Telemed J E Health, 2016; 22(12):981–990; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0137
36.
ToombsE, KowatchKR, DalicandroL, et al.A systematic review of electronic mental health interventions for Indigenous youth: Results and recommendations. J Telemed Telecare, 2021; 27(9):539–552; doi: 10.1177/1357633X19899231
37.
MacPhersonM. Immigrant, refugee, and Indigenous Canadians’ experiences with virtual health care services: Rapid review. JMIR Hum Factors, 2023; 10:e47288; doi: 10.2196/47288
38.
PainterJ, TurnerJ, ProcterP. If there’s something strange in your neighbourhood, who you gonna call? Perceived mental health service user suitability for video consultations. Healthcare (Basel), 2021; 9(5):517; doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050517
39.
OlayiwolaJN, MagañaC, HarmonA, et al.Telehealth as a bright spot of the COVID-19 pandemic: Recommendations from the virtual frontlines (“Frontweb”). JMIR Public Health Surveill, 2020; 6(2):e19045; doi: 10.2196/19045
40.
FujiokaJK, NguyenM, PhungM, et al.Redesigning primary care. Can Fam Physician, 2023; 69(4):e78–e85; doi: 10.46747/cfp.6904e78
41.
BarberCEH, LevyDM, AhluwaliaV, et al.Best practices for virtual care: A consensus statement from the Canadian Rheumatology Association. J Rheumatol, 2022; 49(4):408–418; doi: 10.3899/jrheum.211017
42.
SterlingR, LeRougeC. On-demand telemedicine as a disruptive health technology: Qualitative study exploring emerging business models and strategies among early adopter organizations in the United States. J Med Internet Res, 2019; 21(11):e14304; doi: 10.2196/14304
43.
NormanS, RamosA, Giantini LarsenAM, et al.Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neuro-oncology outcomes. J Neurooncol, 2021; 154(3):375–381; doi: 10.1007/s11060-021-03838-z
44.
GloverJ, ElliottJ, McIntyre MuddleK, South West Frail Senior Strategy Regional Patient and Family Caregiver Advisory Group. Co-designing together through crisis: Development of a virtual care guidance document to support providers, older adults, and caregivers. Can J Aging, 2023; 42(2):359–369; doi: 10.1017/S0714980822000307
45.
JonesE, Cross-BarnetC. Telehealth as a tool to transform pediatric care: Views from stakeholders. Telemed J E Health, 2023; 29(12):1843–1852; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0496
46.
ReidS, BhattM, ZemekR, et al.Virtual care in the pediatric emergency department: A new way of doing business? CJEM, 2021; 23(1):80–84; doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00048-w
47.
RothEG, MindenSL, MaloniHW, et al.A qualitative, multiperspective inquiry of multiple sclerosis telemedicine in the United States. Int J MS Care, 2022; 24(6):275–281; doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2021-117
48.
SitterKE, WongDH, BoltonRE, et al.Clinical appropriateness of telehealth: A qualitative study of endocrinologists’ perspectives. J Endocr Soc, 2022; 6(8):bvac089; doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvac089
49.
LeePS, KooS, PanterS. The value of physical examination in the era of telemedicine. J R Coll Physicians Edinb, 2021; 51(1):85–90; doi: 10.4997/jrcpe.2021.122
50.
SegalJB, DukhaninV, DavisS. Telemedicine in primary care: Qualitative work towards a framework for appropriate use. J Am Board Fam Med, 2022; 35(3):507–516; doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.210229
51.
AquinoM, GriffithJ, VattaparambilT, et al.Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on and needs of telemonitoring to support clinical management and self-care of people at high risk for preeclampsia: Qualitative study. JMIR Hum Factors, 2022; 9(1):e32545; doi: 10.2196/32545
52.
FortneyJC, PyneJM, TurnerEE, et al.Telepsychiatry integration of mental health services into rural primary care settings. Int Rev Psychiatry, 2015; 27(6):525–539; doi: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1085838
53.
MarkweiM, GojeO. Optimizing mother–baby wellness during the 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic: A case for telemedicine. Womens Health (Lond), 2021; 17:17455065211013262; doi: 10.1177/17455065211013262
54.
NittariG, SavvaD, TomassoniD, et al.Telemedicine in the COVID-19 Era: A narrative review based on current evidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022; 19(9):5101; doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095101
55.
EllisMJ, NormandH, GargaroJ, et al.Current use and future considerations for concussion telemedicine healthcare in Canada. Can J Neurol Sci, 2023; 50(2):257–261; doi: 10.1017/cjn.2022.18
56.
MuellersKA, AndreadisK, MkuuRS, et al.Telemedicine decision-making in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Balancing patient agency and provider expertise. Health Policy Technol, 2024; 13(2):100839; doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100839
57.
BaroniMP, JacobMFA, RiosWR, et al.The state of the art in telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal conditions. Arch Physiother, 2023; 13(1):1; doi: 10.1186/s40945-022-00155-0
58.
LeongR, SandersonKE, KlassenAF, et al.Comparing the suitability of virtual versus in-person care: Perceptions from pediatricians. J Telemed Telecare, 2025; 31(5):667–672; doi: 10.1177/1357633X231205329
59.
LamPW, SchwartzIS, MedfordRJ. Use of virtual care by infectious disease specialists in Canada: A national survey. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol, 2022; 2(1):e106; doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.246
60.
NayyarD, PendrithC, KishimotoV, et al.Quality of virtual care for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: Patient and provider experiences. Int J Med Inform, 2022; 165:104812; doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104812
61.
DingwallKM, PuszkaS, SweetM, et al.“Like drawing into sand”: Acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of a new e‐mental health resource for service providers working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Aust Psychol, 2015; 50(1):60–69; doi: 10.1111/ap.12100
62.
KimSY, DaleyK, PruskiAD, et al.Implementation of a framework for telerehabilitation in clinical care across the continuum during COVID-19 and beyond. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2022; 101(1):53–60; doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001904
63.
PooniR, RonisT, LeeT, CARRA Investigators. Telemedicine use by pediatric rheumatologists during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J, 2021; 19(1):93; doi: 10.1186/s12969-021-00565-7
64.
AhmedS, KellyYP, BeheraTR, et al.Utility, appropriateness, and content of electronic consultations across medical subspecialties. Ann Intern Med, 2020; 172(10):641–647; doi: 10.7326/M19-3852
65.
HenselJM, YangR, RaiM, et al.Optimizing electronic consultation between primary care providers and psychiatrists: Mixed-methods study. J Med Internet Res, 2018; 20(4):e124; doi: 10.2196/jmir.8943
66.
DanielH, SulmasyLS, Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians. Policy recommendations to guide the use of telemedicine in primary care settings: An American College of Physicians position paper. Ann Intern Med, 2015; 163(10):787–789; doi: 10.7326/M15-0498
67.
Gotlib ConnL, TahmasebiH, MetiN, et al.Cancer treatment during COVID-19: A qualitative analysis of patient-perceived risks and experiences with virtual care. J Patient Exp, 2021; 8:23743735211039328; doi: 10.1177/23743735211039328
68.
ThompsonMA, FuhlbriggeAL, PearsonDW, et al.Building eConsult (electronic consults) capability at an academic medical center to improve efficiencies in delivering specialty care. J Prim Care Community Health, 2021; 12:21501327211005303; doi: 10.1177/21501327211005303
69.
GossCW, RichardsonWJ, DaileyN, et al.Rural American Indian and Alaska Native veterans’ telemental health: A model of culturally centered care. Psychol Serv, 2017; 14(3):270–278; doi: 10.1037/ser0000149
70.
MaroongrogeS, DeB, WoodhouseKD, et al.Physician perspectives on telemedicine in radiation oncology. Adv Radiat Oncol, 2023; 8(2):101005; doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101005
71.
WoodT, FreemanS, BannerD, et al.Exploring user perspectives of factors associated with use of teletrauma in rural areas. Australas Emerg Care, 2022; 25(2):106–114; doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2021.04.001
72.
YuJ, YunH, UnruhMA, et al.Perspectives of physicians with experience in nursing home care on telehealth use during the COVID-19 public health emergency. J Gen Intern Med, 2023; 38(7):1722–1728; doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08087-6
73.
PoulinPA, RomanowHC, ChengJ, et al.Offering eConsult to family physicians with patients on a pain clinic wait list: An outreach exercise. J Healthc Qual, 2018; 40(5):e71–e76; doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000117
74.
HynieM, OdaA, CalaresuM, et al.Access to virtual mental healthcare and support for refugee and immigrant groups: A scoping review. J Immigr Minor Health, 2023; 25(5):1171–1195; doi: 10.1007/s10903-023-01521-1
75.
HooshmandM, ForondaC. Comparison of telemedicine to traditional face-to-face care for children with special needs: A quasiexperimental study. Telemed J E Health, 2018; 24(6):433–441; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0116
76.
BlacquiereD, LindsayMP, FoleyN, et al.; Heart and Stroke Foundation Canadian Stroke Best Practice Committees. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Telestroke best practice guidelines update 2017. Int J Stroke, 2017; 12(8):886–895; doi: 10.1177/1747493017706239
77.
PeraccaSB, JacksonGL, LamkinRP, et al.Implementing teledermatology for rural veterans: an evaluation using the RE-AIM framework. Telemed J E Health, 2021; 27(2):218–226; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0013
78.
BaileyRC, KnowlesNG, GrenyerBFS. Efficacy and recommendations for the delivery of telehealth psychotherapy for people with personality disorder. Australas Psychiatry, 2024; 32(2):125–134; doi: 10.1177/10398562231222768
79.
JohnsonGR. Toward uniform competency standards in telepsychology: A proposed framework for Canadian psychologists. Can Psychol, 2014; 55(4):291–302; doi: 10.1037/a0038002
80.
TalalAH, SofikitouEM, JaanimägiU, et al.A framework for patient-centered telemedicine: Application and lessons learned from vulnerable populations. J Biomed Inform, 2020; 112:103622; doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103622
81.
RayKN, DemirciJR, BogenDL, et al.Optimizing telehealth strategies for subspecialty care: Recommendations from rural pediatricians. Telemed J E Health, 2015; 21(8):622–629; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0186
82.
LalS, GleesonJ, RivardL, et al.Adaptation of a digital health innovation to prevent relapse and support recovery in youth receiving services for First-Episode Psychosis: Results From the Horyzons-Canada phase 1 study. JMIR Form Res, 2020; 4(10):e19887; doi: 10.2196/19887
83.
WongA, BhyatR, SrivastavaS, et al.Patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Use of virtual care. J Med Internet Res, 2021; 23(1):e20621; doi: 10.2196/20621
84.
WongJ, YoungE, HungL, et al.Beyond Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle – staff perceptions on facilitators and barriers to the implementation of telepresence robots in long-term care. BMC Health Serv Res, 2023; 23(1):772; doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09741-9
85.
WhiteheadL, TalevskiJ, FatehiF, et al.Barriers to and facilitators of digital health among culturally and linguistically diverse populations: Qualitative systematic review. J Med Internet Res, 2023; 25:e42719; doi: 10.2196/42719
86.
AshcroftR, DahrougeS, LamS, et al.Perspectives and recommendations from patients and caregivers on the role of virtual care in Ontario’s primary care system. Ann Fam Med, 2023:5167; doi: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.5167
87.
McLeodSL, MondouxS, HallJN, et al.Demographic characteristics, outcomes and experience of patients using virtual urgent care services from 14 emergency department led sites in Ontario. CJEM, 2023; 25(1):65–73; doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00407-9
88.
RushKL, BurtonL, LoewenP, et al.Patients’ experiences with the fit of virtual atrial fibrillation care during the pandemic: Qualitative descriptive study. JMIR Cardio, 2023; 7:e41548; doi: 10.2196/41548
89.
RoachP, OdyM, CampbellP, et al.Access, relationships, quality and safety (ARQS): a qualitative study to develop an Indigenous-centred understanding of virtual care quality. BMJ Open Qual, 2022; 11(4):e002028; doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002028
90.
CurranVR, HollettA, PeddleE. Virtual care and COVID-19: A survey study of adoption, satisfaction and continuing education preferences of healthcare providers in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Front Digit Health, 2022; 4:970112; doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.970112
91.
CurranV, HollettA, PeddleE. Training for virtual care: What do the experts think? Digit Health, 2023; 9:20552076231179028; doi: 10.1177/20552076231179028
92.
BudhwaniS, FujiokaJ, Thomas-JacquesT, et al.Challenges and strategies for promoting health equity in virtual care: Findings and policy directions from a scoping review of reviews. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2022; 29(5):990–999; doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac022
93.
RosaWE, LynchKA, HadlerRA, et al.“It took away and stripped a part of myself”: clinician distress and recommendations for future telepalliative care delivery in the cancer context. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 2023; 40(2):235–243; doi: 10.1177/10499091221101883
94.
VolpeT, BoydellKM, PignatielloA. Mental health services for Nunavut children and youth: Evaluating a telepsychiatry pilot project. Rural Remote Health, 2014; 14(2):2673.
95.
PeahlAF, ZahnCM, TurrentineM, et al.The Michigan plan for appropriate tailored healthcare in pregnancy prenatal care recommendations. Obstet Gynecol, 2021; 138(4):593–602; doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004531
96.
CafferyLJ, BradfordNK, SmithAC, et al.How telehealth facilitates the provision of culturally appropriate healthcare for Indigenous Australians. J Telemed Telecare, 2018; 24(10):676–682; doi: 10.1177/1357633X18795764
97.
OseranAS, AfariME, BarrettCD, et al.Beyond the stethoscope: Managing ambulatory heart failure during the COVID‐19 pandemic. ESC Heart Fail, 2021; 8(2):999–1006; doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13201
98.
AdamsSJ, BurbridgeB, ObaidH, et al.Telerobotic sonography for remote diagnostic imaging: Narrative review of current developments and clinical applications. J Ultrasound Med, 2021; 40(7):1287–1306; doi: 10.1002/jum.15525
99.
BerczeliM, BritzGW, LohT, et al.Telerobotic endovascular interventions and their potential for cerebrovascular treatment. Tex Heart Inst J, 2022; 49(2):e217608; doi: 10.14503/THIJ-21-7608
100.
LovoS, HarrisonL, O’ConnellME, et al.A physical therapist and nurse practitioner model of care for chronic back pain using telehealth: Diagnostic and management concordance. J Telemed Telecare, 2024; 30(5):842–850; doi: 10.1177/1357633X221098904
101.
DinhA, YinAL, EstrinD, et al.Augmented reality in real-time telemedicine and telementoring: Scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2023; 11:e45464; doi: 10.2196/45464
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
