The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that infants be exclusively breastfed for a minimum of 6 months; however in Arkansas, only 23.8% of mothers are exclusively breastfeeding at 6 months, despite an 81.2% breastfeeding initiation rate. Easy access to professional lactation consultants through telehealth can reduce barriers to prolonged breastfeeding through continuity of education, troubleshooting for problems, and positive emotional support. The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of virtual lactation visits with a lactation consultant on sustaining breastfeeding at 2 months postnatal.
Methods:
A total of 100 pregnant women were recruited, with 39 lost to follow-up. Participants received lactation support via telehealth with appointments at approximately 2 days, 7 days, 1 month, and 2 months post-discharge. Quantitative analysis included descriptive statistics and paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to evaluate pre- and post-survey changes in breastfeeding knowledge.
Results:
Sixty-one participants completed both pre- and post-surveys. Infant feeding intention scores were high, with an average score of 13.08 ± 3.09 out of 16. The Vermont Breastfeeding Attrition Prediction Scale scores were high, which had an average score of 21.93 ± 5.67 out of 38, with scores >20 indicating a high likelihood to sustain breastfeeding. Breastfeeding knowledge was significantly increased (p < 0.0001) after the telelactation intervention, with an average pre-survey score of 70.26 ± 5.40 and post-survey average score of 74.77 ± 4.31.
Conclusion:
Findings of this study underscore the effectiveness of telelactation in enhancing breastfeeding education and support, emphasizing its potential as a critical resource for sustaining breastfeeding practices.
MercierRJ, BurcherTA, HorowitzR, et al.Differences in breastfeeding among Medicaid and commercially insured patients: A retrospective cohort study. Breastfeed Med, 2018; 13(4):286–291; doi: 10.1089/bfm.2017.0228
6.
ThomaME, De SilvaDA, KimJ, et al.Breastfeeding initiation trends by special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children participation and race/ethnicity among Medicaid births. J Nutr Educ Behav, 2023; 55(3):170–181; doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2022.09.006
Bibbins-DomingoK, GrossmanDC, CurrySJ, et al.; US Preventive Services Task Force. Primary care interventions to support breastfeeding: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA, 2016; 316(16):1688–1693; doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14697
9.
BrandE, KothariC, StarkMA. Factors related to breastfeeding discontinuation between hospital discharge and 2 weeks postpartum. J Perinat Educ, 2011; 20(1):36–44; doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.20.1.36
10.
LoweNK. The Surgeon General’s call to action to support breastfeeding. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 2011; 40(4):387–389; doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01266.x
11.
DemirciJ, KotziasV, BogenDL, et al.Telelactation via mobile app: Perspectives of rural mothers, their care providers, and lactation consultants. Telemed J E Health, 2019; 25(9):853–858; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0113
12.
Uscher-PinesL, MehrotraA, BogenDL. The emergence and promise of telelactation. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017; 217(2):176–178.e1; doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.043
13.
FriesenCA, HormuthLJ, PetersenD, et al.Using videoconferencing technology to provide breastfeeding support to low-income women: Connecting hospital-based lactation consultants with clients receiving care at a community health center. J Hum Lact, 2015; 31(4):595–599; doi: 10.1177/0890334415601088
14.
Börsch-SupanA, BrandtM, HunklerC, et al.Data resource profile: The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Int J Epidemio, 2013; 42(4):992–1001; doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt088
Nommsen-RiversLA, DeweyKG. Development and validation of the infant feeding intentions scale. Matern Child Health J, 2009; 13(3):334–342; doi: 10.1007/s10995-008-0356-y
Abbass-DickJ, NewportA, PattisonD, et al.Development, psychometric assessment, and predictive validity of the comprehensive breastfeeding knowledge scale. Midwifery, 2020; 83:102642; doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102642
23.
HibbardJH, StockardJ, MahoneyER, et al.Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res, 2004; 39(4 Pt 1):1005–1026; doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x
24.
ChewLD, BradleyKA, BoykoEJ. Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Fam Med, 2004; 36(8):588–594.
DiamantAL, HaysRD, MoralesLS, et al.Delays and unmet need for health care among adult primary care patients in a restructured urban public health system. Am J Public Health, 2004; 94(5):783–789; doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.5.783
PatelS, PatelS. The effectiveness of lactation consultants and lactation counselors on breastfeeding outcomes. J Hum Lact, 2016; 32(3):530–541; doi: 10.1177/0890334415618668
30.
ChetwyndEM, WasserHM, PooleC. Breastfeeding support interventions by International Board-Certified Lactation Consultants: A systemic review and meta-analysis. J Hum Lact, 2019; 35(3):424–440; doi: 10.1177/0890334419851482
31.
MildonA, FrancisJ, StewartS, et al.Effect on breastfeeding practices of providing in-home lactation support to vulnerable women through the Canada prenatal nutrition program: Protocol for a pre/post intervention study. Int Breastfeed J, 2021; 16(1):57–59; doi: 10.1186/s13006-021-00396-y
32.
BarbosaW, ZhouK, WaddellE, et al.Improving access to care: Telemedicine across medical domains. Annu Rev Public Health, 2021; 42(1):463–481; doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090519-093711
33.
EkelandAG, BowesA, FlottorpS. Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform, 2010; 79(11):736–771; doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.08.006
34.
Maleki-SaghooniN, Amel BarezM, KarimiFZ. Investigation of the relationship between social support and breastfeeding self-efficacy in primiparous breastfeeding mothers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2020; 33(18):3097–3102; doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1568986
35.
IsiguzoC, MendezDD, DemirciJR, et al.Stress, social support, and racial differences: Dominant drivers of exclusive breastfeeding. Matern Child Nutr, 2023; 19(2):e13459; doi: 10.1111/mcn.13459
AwaliyahSN, RachmawatiIN, RahmahH. Breastfeeding self-efficacy as a dominant factor affecting maternal breastfeeding satisfaction. BMC Nurs, 2019; 18(Suppl 1):30–37; doi: 10.1186/s12912-019-0359-6
38.
WallenbornJT, IhongbeT, RozarioS, et al.Knowledge of breastfeeding recommendations and breastfeeding duration: A survival analysis on infant feeding practices II. Breastfeed Med, 2017; 12(3):156–162; doi: 10.1089/bfm.2016.0170
39.
SuD, MichaudTL, EstabrooksP, et al.Diabetes management through remote patient monitoring: The importance of patient activation and engagement with the technology. Telemed J E Health, 2019; 25(10):952–959; doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0205
40.
NewlandP, LorenzR, OliverBJ. Patient activation in adults with chronic conditions: A systematic review. J Health Psychol, 2021; 26(1):103–114; doi: 10.1177/1359105320947790
41.
ShivelyMJ, GardettoNJ, KodiathMF, et al.Effect of patient activation on self-management in patients with heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2013; 28(1):20–34; doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e318239f9f9
42.
BilgramiZ, AbutalebA, Chudy-OnwugajeK, et al.Effect of telemedicine for inflammatory bowel disease on patient activation and self-efficacy. Dig Dis Sci, 2020; 65(1):96–103; doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5433-5
