Abstract
Introduction:
Lyme disease has expanded into western North Carolina. We sought to document knowledge, attitudes, and practices among clinicians in this region.
Materials and Methods:
A survey was administered to clinicians in western North Carolina. Frequencies summarized Lyme-related care. Fisher’s exact test compared low-knowledge items (<75% correct) by provider type, clinical experience, and regional tenure. Likert-type items measured attitudes; open-ended responses identified education barriers.
Results:
Among 28 participants, 59% (16/27) saw a suspected Lyme case in the past year. The median knowledge score was 59% (interquartile range: 47–73%), with low confidence interpreting test results (median Likert score = 2, interquartile range: 1–3). Correct identification of erythema migrans timing differed by regional tenure (≤5 years: 16/18 [89%]; >5 years: 3/8 [38%]; p = 0.014). Recognition of when testing is not recommended differed by provider type (physician: 11/20 [55%], nurse practitioner: 0/6 [0%]; p = 0.024). Perceived education barriers included cost, time, and small patient population.
Discussion:
Overall, knowledge was limited, particularly for diagnostic testing. Clinicians in emerging communities should be prioritized for educational interventions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
