Masculine Defaults in Academic Science,Technology,Engineering,and Mathematics (STEM) Fields

Amanatullah E. T. Morris M. W. (2010). Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017094

Anderson C. Brion S. Moore D. A. Kennedy J. A. (2012). A status-enhancement account of overconfidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 718–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029395

Anderson K. J. Leaper C. (1998). Meta-analyses of gender effects on conversational interruption: Who, what, when, where, and how. Sex Roles, 39, 225–252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018802521676

Antecol H. Bedard K. Stearns J. (2018). Equal but inequitable: Who benefits from gender-neutral tenure clock stopping policies? American Economic Review, 108(9), 2420–2441. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160613

Bellas M. L. (1999). Emotional labor in academia: The case of professors. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 561(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629956100107

Berdahl J. L. Cooper M. Glick P. Livingston R. W. Williams J. C. (2018). Work as a masculinity contest. Journal of Social Issues, 74(3), 422–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12289

Bian L. Leslie S.-J. Cimpian A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524

Bian L. Leslie S.-J. Cimpian A. (2018). Evidence of bias against girls and women in contexts that emphasize intellectual ability. American Psychologist, 73(9), 1139–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000427

Bian L. Leslie S.-J. Murphy M. C. Cimpian A. (2018). Messages about brilliance undermine women’s interest in educational and professional opportunities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.006

Bird S. Litt J. Wang Y. (2004). Creating status of women reports: Institutional housekeeping as “women’s work.” NWSA Journal, 16(1), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2004.16.1.194

Brooks A. W. Huang L. Kearney S. W. Murray F. E. (2014). Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111(12), 4427–4431. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321202111

Canning E. A. Ozier E. Williams H. E. AlRasheed R. Murphy M. C. (2022). Professors who signal a fixed mindset about ability undermine women’s performance in STEM. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(5), 927–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211030398

Castilla E. J. Benard S. (2010). The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 543–576. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543

Cech E. A. Blair-Loy M. Rogers L. (2016). Recognizing chilliness: How schemas of inequality shape views of culture and climate in work environments. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 6(1), 125–160. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-016-0019-1

Ceci S. J. Kahn S. Williams W. M. (2023). Exploring gender bias in six key domains of academic science: An adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 24(1), 15–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006231163179

Cheryan S. Lombard E. J. Hudson L. Louis K. Plaut V. C. Murphy M. C. (2020). Double isolation: Identity expression threat predicts greater gender disparities in computer science. Self and Identity, 19(4), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1609576

Cheryan S. Markus H. R. (2020). Masculine defaults: Identifying and mitigating hidden cultural biases. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1022–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000209

Cheryan S. Plaut V. C. Davies P. G. Steele C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239

Clark S. M. Corcoran M. (1986). Perspectives on the professional socialization of women faculty: A case of accumulative disadvantage? The Journal of Higher Education, 57(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1986.11778747

Crowley K. Callanan M. A. Tenenbaum H. R. Allen E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12(3), 258–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00347

Del Pinal G. Madva A. Reuter K . (2017). Stereotypes, conceptual centrality and gender bias: An empirical investigation. Ratio, 30(4), 384–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12170

Diekman A. B. Brown E. R. Johnston A. M. Clark E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377342

Diekman A. B. Clark E. K. Johnston A. M. Brown E. R. Steinberg M. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to STEM careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 902–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025199

Dweck C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315783048

Eagly A. H. Wood W. Diekman A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In Eckes T. Trautner H. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Erlbaum.

Emerson K. T. U. Murphy M. C. (2015). A company I can trust? Organizational lay theories moderate stereotype threat for women. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(2), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214564969

Feist G. J. (2016). Intrinsic and extrinsic science: A dialectic of scientific fame. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(6), 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616660535

Fox M. F. Colatrella C. (2006). Participation, performance, and advancement of women in academic science and engineering: What is at issue and why. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(3), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-7209-x

Fox M. F. Fonseca C. Bao J. (2011). Work and family conflict in academic science: Patterns and predictors among women and men in research universities. Social Studies of Science, 41(5), 715–735. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711417730

Gallimore A. D. (2019, May 1). An engineering school with half of its leadership female? How did that happen? The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/An-Engineering-School-With/246214

Gaucher D. Friesen J. Kay A. C. (2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022530

Hamedani M. Y. G. Markus H. R. (2019). Understanding culture clashes and catalyzing change: A culture cycle approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 700. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00700

Heyder A. Weidinger A. F. Cimpian A. Steinmayr R. (2020). Teachers’ belief that math requires innate ability predicts lower intrinsic motivation among low-achieving students. Learning and Instruction, 65, Article 101220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101220

Hoppe T. A. Litovitz A. Willis K. A. Meseroll R. A. Perkins M. J. Hutchins B. I. Davis A. F. Lauer M. S. Valantine H. A. Anderson J. M. Santangelo G. M. (2019). Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists. Science Advances, 5(10), Article eaaw7238. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw7238

Jaxon J. Lei R. F. Shachnai R. Chestnut E. K. Cimpian A. (2019). The acquisition of gender stereotypes about intellectual ability: Intersections with race. Journal of Social Issues, 75(4), 1192–1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12352

Joshi M. P. Benson-Greenwald T. M. Diekman A. B. (2022). Unpacking motivational culture: Diverging emphasis on communality and agency across STEM domains. Motivation Science, 8(4), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000276

Joshi P. D. Wakslak C. J. Appel G. Huang L. (2020). Gender differences in communicative abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000177

Kang C. (2014, April 2). Google data-mines its approach to promoting women. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2014/04/02/google-data-mines-its-women-problem/

Kerger S. Martin R. Brunner M. (2011). How can we enhance girls’ interest in scientific topics? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 606–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02019.x

Koc Y. Gulseren D. Lyubykh Z. (2021). Masculinity contest culture reduces organizational citizenship behaviors through decreased organizational identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 27(2), 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000351

Kolev J. Fuentes-Medel Y. Murray F. (2020). Gender differences in scientific communication and their impact on grant funding decisions. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 110, 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20201043

Lerchenmueller M. J. Sorenson O. Jena A. B. (2019). Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: Observational study. BMJ, 367, Article l6573. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6573

Leslie S.-J. Cimpian A. Meyer M. Freeland E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375

Link A. N. Swann C. A. Bozeman B. (2008). A time allocation study of university faculty. Economics of Education Review, 27(4), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.04.002

Mac Giolla E. Kajonius P. J . (2019). Sex differences in personality are larger in gender equal countries: Replicating and extending a surprising finding. International Journal of Psychology, 54(6), 705–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12529

Markus H. R. Conner A. L. (2014). Clash! How to thrive in a multicultural world. Penguin.

Markus H. R. Kitayama S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557

Misra J. Lundquist J. H. Templer A. (2012). Gender, work time, and care responsibilities among faculty. Sociological Forum, 27(2), 300–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2012.01319.x

Moors A. C. Stewart A. J. Malley J. E. (2022). Gendered impact of caregiving responsibilities on tenure track faculty parents’ professional lives. Sex Roles, 87(9), 498–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01324-y

Morgan A. C. Way S. F. Hoefer M. J. D. Larremore D. B. Galesic M. Clauset A. (2021). The unequal impact of parenthood in academia. Science Advances, 7(9), Article eabd1996. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd1996

Morgenroth T. Fine C. Ryan M. K. Genat A. E. (2018). Sex, drugs, and reckless driving: Are measures biased toward identifying risk-taking in men? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(6), 744–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617722833

Morgenroth T. Ryan M. K. (2021). The effects of gender trouble: An integrative theoretical framework of the perpetuation and disruption of the gender/sex binary. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1113–1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620902442

Moss-Racusin C. A. Dovidio J. F. Brescoll V. L. Graham M. J. Handelsman J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109

Murphy M. C. Mejia A. F. Mejia J. Yan X. Cheryan S. Dasgupta N. Destin M. Fryberg S. A. Garcia J. A. Haines E. L. Harackiewicz J. M. Ledgerwood A. Moss-Racusin C. A. Park L. E. Perry S. P. Ratliff K. A. Rattan A. Sanchez D. T. Savani K. . . . Pestilli F. (2020). Open science, communal culture, and women’s participation in the movement to improve science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 117(39), 24154–24164. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921320117

National Science Foundation. (2021). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21321/report

Nord C. Roey S. Perkins R. Lyons M. Lemanski N. Brown J. Schuknecht J. (2011). The nation’s report card: America’s high school graduates. Results of the 2009 NAEP high school transcript study (NCES Report No. 2011-462). National Center for Education Statistics. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518324.pdf

O’Meara K. Jaeger A. Misra J. Lennartz C. Kuvaeva A. (2018). Undoing disparities in faculty workloads: A randomized trial experiment. PLOS ONE, 13(12), Article e0207316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207316

Park S. M. (1996). Research, teaching, and service: Why shouldn’t women’s work count? The Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), 46–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1996.11780249

Rudman L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629

Staley O. (2016, August 22). Harvey Mudd College took on gender bias and now has more than half its computer-science majors are women. Quartz. https://qz.com/730290/harvey-mudd-college-took-on-gender-bias-and-now-more-than-half-its-computer-science-majors-are-women/

Stephens N. M. Fryberg S. A. Markus H. R. Johnson C. S. Covarrubias R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027143

Taylor C. (2013, October 10). How Harvey Mudd transformed its computer science program — and nearly closed its gender gap. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2013/10/10/how-harvey-mudd-transformed-its-computer-science-program-and-nearly-closed-its-gender-gap/

Vial A. C. Muradoglu M. Newman G. E. Cimpian A. (2022). An emphasis on brilliance fosters masculinity-contest cultures. Psychological Science, 33(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211044133

Weisberg Y. J. DeYoung C. G. Hirsh J. B. (2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178

Williams C. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems, 39(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1992.39.3.03x0034h

Williams M. J. Tiedens L. Z. (2016). The subtle suspension of backlash: A meta-analysis of penalties for women’s implicit and explicit dominance behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 142(2), 165–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000039

Winslow S. (2010). Gender inequality and time allocations among academic faculty. Gender & Society, 24(6), 769–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210386728

Wuchty S. Jones B. F. Uzzi B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099

Xu Y. J. Martin C. L. (2011). Gender differences in STEM disciplines: From the aspects of informal professional networking and faculty career development. Gender Issues, 28(3), 134–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-011-9104-5