AnandR.WintersM. F. (2008). A retrospective view of corporate diversity training from 1964 to the present. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(3), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2008.34251673
BezrukovaK.SpellC. S.PerryJ. L.JehnK. A. (2016). A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 142(11), 1227–1274. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000067
4.
CarnesM.DevineP. G.ManwellL. B.Byars-WinstonA.FineE.FordC. E.ForscherP.IsaacC.KaatzA.MaguaW.PaltaM.SheridanJ. (2015). Effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: A cluster randomized, controlled trial. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 90(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000552
5.
CorneilleO.HütterM. (2020). Implicit? What do you mean? A comprehensive review of the delusive implicitness construct in attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(3), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320911325
6.
De HouwerJ.Teige-MocigembaS.SpruytA.MoorsA. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(3), 347–368.
7.
DijksterhuisA.AlbersL. W.BongersK. C. (2008). Digging for the real attitude: Lessons from research on implicit and explicit self-esteem. In PettyR. E.FazioR. H.BriñolP. (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 249–270). Psychology Press.
DoesS.DerksB.EllemersN. (2011). Thou shalt not discriminate: How emphasizing moral ideals rather than obligations increases Whites’ support for social equality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.024
10.
DuntonB. C.FazioR. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(3), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297233009
11.
FazioR. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75–109). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60318-4
FazioR. H.OlsonM. A. (2014). The MODE model: Attitude-behavior processes as a function of motivation and opportunity. In ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual process theories of the social mind (pp. 155–171). Guilford Press.
GreenwaldA. G.DasguptaN.DovidioJ. F.KangJ.Moss-RacusinC. A.TeachmanB. A. (2022). Implicit-bias remedies: Treating discriminatory bias as a public-health problem. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 23(1), 7–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006211070781
17.
HahnA.GawronskiB. (2019). Facing one’s implicit biases: From awareness to acknowledgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(5), 769–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000155
18.
KezarA. (2012). Bottom-up/top-down leadership: Contradiction or hidden phenomenon. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(5), 725–760. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2012.0030
19.
KunstmanJ. W.PlantE. A.ZielaskowskiK.LaCosseJ. (2013). Feeling in with the outgroup: Outgroup acceptance and the internalization of the motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(3), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033082
20.
LaiC. K.SkinnerA. L.CooleyE.MurrarS.BrauerM.DevosT.CalanchiniJ.XiaoY. J.PedramC.MarshburnC. K.SimonS.BlancharJ. C.Joy-GabaJ. A.ConwayJ.RedfordL.KleinR. A.RoussosG.SchellhaasF. M. H.BurnsM.. . . NosekB. A. (2016). Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 1001–1016. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000179
21.
LegaultL.GutsellJ. N.InzlichtM. (2011). Ironic effects of antiprejudice messages: How motivational interventions can reduce (but also increase) prejudice. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1472–1477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611427918
22.
LoerschC.BartholowB. D.ManningM.CalanchiniJ.ShermanJ. W. (2015). Intoxicated prejudice: The impact of alcohol consumption on implicitly and explicitly measured racial attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(2), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214561693
23.
McNultyJ. K.OlsonM. A.JonesR. E.AcostaL. M. (2017). Automatic associations between one’s partner and one’s affect as the proximal mechanism of change in relationship satisfaction: Evidence from evaluative conditioning. Psychological Science, 28(8), 1031–1040. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702014
24.
MeyersonD. E. (2003). Tempered radicals: How everyday leaders inspire change at work. Harvard Business School Press.
25.
Moss-RacusinC. A.van der ToornJ.DovidioJ. F.BrescollV. L.GrahamM. J.HandelsmanJ. (2016). A “scientific diversity” intervention to reduce gender bias in a sample of life scientists. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), Article ar29. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-09-0187
26.
MurrarS.CampbellM. R.BrauerM. (2020). Exposure to peers’ pro-diversity attitudes increases inclusion and reduces the achievement gap. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(9), 889–897. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0899-5
27.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2008). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. In PettyR. E.FazioR. H.BriñolP. (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 19–64). Psychology Press.
28.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H.HermannA. D. (2007). Reporting tendencies underlie discrepancies between implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem. Psychological Science, 18(4), 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01890.x
29.
OlsonM. A.ZabelK. L. (2016). Measures of prejudice. In NelsonT. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 175–212). Psychology Press.
PearsonA. R.DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2009). The nature of contemporary prejudice: Insights from aversive racism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(3), 314–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00183.x
33.
PettigrewT. F. (2021). Contextual social psychology: Reanalyzing prejudice, voting, and intergroup contact. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000210-000
34.
PhillipsJ. E.OlsonM. A. (2014). When implicitly and explicitly measured racial attitudes align: The roles of social desirability and thoughtful responding. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2014.881287
35.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811
ShteynbergG.HirshJ. B.BentleyR. A.GarthoffJ. (2020). Shared worlds and shared minds: A theory of collective learning and a psychology of common knowledge. Psychological Review, 127(5), 918–931. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000200
38.
TeachmanB. A.WoodyS. R. (2003). Automatic processing in spider phobia: Implicit fear associations over the course of treatment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.1.100
39.
TroppL. R.BarlowF. K. (2018). Making advantaged racial groups care about inequality: Intergroup contact as a route to psychological investment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417743282